Conclusions and recommendationsDuring the process of preparing the Study the team of experts has formulated some conclusions and recommendations related to the topics and how to provide followupsto promote the subject in various fields.ConclusionsThe processes that involve the interaction of knowledge and wisdom of indigenouspeoples in Central America are a collective social construction, where you must be clearof the limitations of the current development models to harmonize them.Is urgently needed to link development planning in favor of the knowledge of thepeoples.The knowledge and wisdom of indigenous peoples do not consider risks in an isolatedmanner, but as an interaction between the cosmos and all living beings that arepresently on Mother Earth (including water, fire, air, etc.). In addition, humans havecontributed to the escalation of risks directly related to lifestyle imposed by a culture ofconsumerism and individualism in the predominant development model.Climate change shows that the cycles of nature and society are deeply linked. It isnot only "because nature is acting out of control" but there are also threats and unsafeconditions, that mankind has caused patterns the deforestation by forests, mountainsand hills of various countries, pollute rivers and mountains, such as mining practices,among others.The existence of practices and technologies from the knowledge and wisdomof indigenous and local peoples have not been taken sufficiently into account. Inmost cases countries have historically underestimated the value of this knowledge andwisdom and are excluded from the formulation of public policies. However, a number ofnational and local processes have been initiated in an attempt to find a space fordialogue and harmonization of such knowledge and wisdom in the context of compliancewith certain international conventions and the demands of indigenous peoples.RecommendationsPromote better models of social and ethnic harmonization through education,legislation, political participation, public policy and other state actions.Take into account the knowledge and wisdom of IP in national and localplanning to build a common understanding of harmonization. Take into accountthe communities in the planning and programming processes for the approvaland harmonization of the subjects of DRR, Climate Change and Biodiversity, forexample, refer to the synergy model proposed in this study.Systematize and share knowledge and wisdom of indigenous peoples whocan provide strategic lines for disaster risk reduction issues, climate changeand biodiversity.Engage indigenous and local communities in managing protected areasand biodiversity protection.Recognize and respect their ancestral knowledge to build modelsof environmentally friendly development.Preserve and sustainably use biodiversity, taking into account theknowledge, wisdom and traditional practices of indigenous peoples.Rescue agro biodiversity for food security in climate change.Strengthen the process of harmonization of knowledge and wisdom ofthe IP related to DRR, CC and Biodiversity, to be projected in public policies,plans and actions at national and local level, and increase communityorganization and resilience.58
In various international conventions such as the Hyogo Framework for Action, BaliDeclaration, the ILO Convention 169, Universal Declaration of the Rights of IndigenousPeoples, Convention on Biological Diversity, Climate Change, Cochabamba Declaration onthe Rights of mother Earth, among others, respect is being shown for indigenouspeoples.To preserve the life of earth requires responsibility and contribution of all.The nowadays consumerist lifestyles do not respect Mother Nature.Weak central management systems that do not reduce local environmentalvulnerability, Disaster Risk and the CC.Harmonization is a process of learning where is important to understand that you needto have sensitivity, willingness to learn and interest in learning other practicesand experiences and openness to change.Raise awareness and strengthen national institutions with the accompanimentof the international institutions, working the theme harmonized DRR, CC andBiodiversity.Legal and political recognition of knowledge and wisdom of IP through thecreation of strategies supported by cooperation in the assessment of knowledgeand wisdom from them.Develop and implement public policies, new laws and regulations and legislativereforms that seek harmonization and complementarity of knowledge andwisdom in matters of DRR, CC and Biodiversity.Strengthen capacity of governments, IP and NGOs to define and developprogrammes and projects for international cooperation based on the needs anddesires of target population, that are reflected in public policies, laws,regulations, programmes, projects, etc. through consultation and otherprocesses where is reflect adequately the expectations of that population, incompliance with the Paris and Antigua Declaration.Engage in dialogue between peoples, policies and philosophy of life tobring diversity to save all of mother earth and to create mechanisms forachieving the harmonization of different knowledge.Find the balance of current lifestyle to achieve living in harmony with the naturalenvironment and civilization.Strengthen stakeholders in charge of national systems of risk management,climate change and biodiversity to take into account the voice and involvementof indigenous and local communities and consequently strengthen participatoryprocesses.Develop the process of harmonization of local, municipal and communityauthorities to strengthen coordination and early warning systems on every level,and in order to generate scenarios and participatory monitoring systems relatedto climate change.Identify and understand the interests (for/against), attitudes (pro/against), andthe balance between contributions and gains (win-win).Recognizing the existence of different visions and methods rather than asingle, fragmented perspective of reality.Awakening people to understand the added value of different approaches and59
- Page 3 and 4:
Executive SummaryCentral America is
- Page 5 and 6:
Central is located in the "Ring of
- Page 7 and 8: Study ContentAs an innovative theme
- Page 9 and 10: that coexist in the universe. This
- Page 11 and 12: Central America level, is the only
- Page 13 and 14: of Mesoamerica has been explained a
- Page 15 and 16: possesses effective cultural commun
- Page 17 and 18: Additionally, to succeed and achiev
- Page 19 and 20: eforestation, hydrological planning
- Page 21 and 22: General thematic introduction on Cl
- Page 23 and 24: Central American Governments should
- Page 25 and 26: projected 109 conditions, changes o
- Page 27 and 28: General introduction on the themati
- Page 29 and 30: participatory manner, to address di
- Page 31 and 32: Causes and complementary consequenc
- Page 33 and 34: Organizational and legal contextWhi
- Page 35 and 36: The three bodies within the SICA ar
- Page 37 and 38: Based on research of available info
- Page 39 and 40: SE-CONREDCivilProtectionSNETCCNISCO
- Page 41 and 42: Synergy model that displays the add
- Page 43 and 44: Added value of indigenous and local
- Page 45 and 46: They do not work in a separate mann
- Page 47 and 48: demand for agricultural raw materia
- Page 49 and 50: Amazon DIPECHO Project “Strengthe
- Page 51 and 52: Indigenous Knowledge on DisasterMit
- Page 53 and 54: The combination of indigenous andsc
- Page 55 and 56: Indigenous Skills and the mysticism
- Page 57: Weather forecast through indigenous
- Page 61 and 62: Recommended ReadingBennett, A., 200
- Page 63 and 64: ILO, 1993, Convenio sobre pueblos i
- Page 65 and 66: Local knowledgeIncludes people and
- Page 67 and 68: which are threatswith a certainprob
- Page 69 and 70: Appreciates and respects their orga
- Page 71 and 72: framework, without taking into acco
- Page 73 and 74: Currently Cacaopera ethnicity, alth
- Page 75 and 76: IDH 228 For 2007 is of 0.6999Politi
- Page 77 and 78: The Mayangnas are people who are de
- Page 79 and 80: Rights of detainees to receive info
- Page 81 and 82: Heritage Protection Article 128The
- Page 83 and 84: 19/09/1996 Law no. 230 Amendments a
- Page 85 and 86: Indigenous Population:IDH 241 In 20
- Page 87 and 88: Honduras, each has a different orig
- Page 89 and 90: MISQUITOS 248 :In 1996 there were 3
- Page 91: Internationalconventions signed wit