13.07.2015 Views

Clock - Uranium Supply Crunch and Critical ... - Andrew Johns

Clock - Uranium Supply Crunch and Critical ... - Andrew Johns

Clock - Uranium Supply Crunch and Critical ... - Andrew Johns

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Canada Research | Page 66 of 87<strong>Uranium</strong>Potential CatalystsPotential catalysts for <strong>Uranium</strong> One could include:• Clarity on terms of Mitsui’s exit from the Honeymoon project (<strong>and</strong> potentially a 49%boost in <strong>Uranium</strong> One’s stake) with 2Q12E results on August 8, 2012;• Definitive feasibility study (DFS) at Mkuju River during 3Q12E;• Results over the coming months from on-going litigation between ARMZ <strong>and</strong> theTanzanian Revenue Agency (TRA);• Production ramp-up at Kharasan (Kazakhstan), Honeymoon (Australia), <strong>and</strong> WillowCreek (Wyoming) throughout the year;• Decision from <strong>Uranium</strong> One on potential acquisition of Mantra (Mkuju River) fromARMZ by June 7, 2013E, with minority shareholder approval to follow.The Quarter AheadFor 2Q12E, we expect a slightly weaker quarter to 1Q12A, with net earnings of US$11.0mln or US$0.01/share (vs. adjusted earnings of US$12.7 mln or US$0.02/share lastquarter). We see production of 2.8 Mlbs (unchanged q/q) <strong>and</strong> sales of 1.9 Mlbs (+7%q/q), in-line with guidance that sales will be heavily weighted to 2H12 this year. Ourhigher revenue line is offset by increased costs, particularly at Akbastau as <strong>Uranium</strong> Onebrings on more staff (for plant construction) <strong>and</strong> on an uptick in higher cost Willow <strong>and</strong>Honeymoon production. That said, our 2012E cash costs are US$17/lb – below thecompany’s US$19/lb.We expect 2Q12 results to be released on August 8, 2012.Valuation <strong>and</strong> FinancialsWe have an Outperform rating <strong>and</strong> $3.60 target on <strong>Uranium</strong> One. Our target is based ona 50/50-weighting of (i) 1.0x P/NAV applied to our C$3.43 NAVPS (8% discount; seeExhibit 77) <strong>and</strong> a 10x P/CF applied to our 2013E CFPS of C$0.35. Our P/NAV multipleplots conservatively against our pre-Fukushima average P/NAV of 1.5x, while our P/CFmultiple reflects our historical producer trading range of 7.7x – 29.9x (dominated byCameco; adjusted for higher <strong>Uranium</strong> One risk).<strong>Uranium</strong> One currently trades at 0.72x P/NAV <strong>and</strong> 7.0x 2013E P/CF, a discount toCameco (1.15x <strong>and</strong> 9.9x) <strong>and</strong> a discount, on a CF basis, to Paladin (0.63x <strong>and</strong> 15.4x). OnEV/lb resources, <strong>Uranium</strong> One trades at US$8.25/lb for the company’s 323.3 Mlbs intotal resources vs. our global producer peers at US$4.74/lb. We believe a major reasonfor this latter premium is the company’s large Russian historic resources, which are notreflected in our metric.Raymond James Ltd. | 2200 – 925 West Georgia Street | Vancouver BC Canada V6C 3L2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!