Download PDF - COINAtlantic

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Methods11 th International Symposium for GIS and Computer Cartography for Coastal Zones ManagementMapping and analysis were crucial to the project and the work needed to be transparent and trusted by both parties.To that end, spatial data were made available to the conservation groups by the Department of Fisheries andOceans (DFO), and analysis was undertaken by analysts at DFO and conservation organizations Living OceansSociety and David Suzuki Foundation. All results were shared and discussed with all parties.A large component of the low sustainability rating (red score) for bottom trawl fishery products was due to thelack of any habitat mitigation in the fishery, aside from closures to protect the Hecate Strait hexactinellid spongereefs. Sustainable seafood rating criteria dictate that a fishery using unmodified bottom trawl gear that continuallycontacts the seabed cannot be rated green; therefore the goal was to find new measures that may achieve a yellowscore. Spatial measures focused on developing a restricted footprint that prevented further spatial expansion, excludedareas of historically high coral and sponge bycatch, and limited overlap with each type of benthic habitat to 50%or less.One of the first challenges of the project was mapping the area of potential impact for each tow. DFO maintains adatabase of trawl data on a tow by tow basis. Historical trawl and bycatch data used in this project were summarisedinto 1x1 km blocks by DFO to facilitate analysis and remove sensitive information and data outliers. The methodassumed that tows follow a straight line between start and end point when, in fact, tows often follow depth contoursrather than straight lines. However, mid-point locations are not consistently recorded, leaving no option but toacknowledge the limitation and potential introduction of error and bias and to recommend consistent collection ofmidpoint locations in future.Information on the distribution of historical trawl effort (1996–2009) by fisheries management statistical areaand depth class was tabulated. Statistics quantifying the overlap of historical bottom trawl locations and alternatedraft footprints (i.e., intersection) with numerous data layers were repeatedly generated. ModelBuilder in ArcMAP9.3 was used to facilitate the time-consuming and repetitive analyses. Data layers compared with fishery footprintsincluded 200 m depth classes to 1200 m deep, surficial geology (Natural Resources Canada), Provincial marineecosections (Province of British Columbia, 2002), benthic classes (BCMCA, 2011), areas of high rugosity(BCMCA, 2011), areas of high coral and sponge bycatch from fishery data and systematic survey data (DFO), 12proposed coral and sponge protection areas (Ardron, 2005), and modelled coral habitat (Finney, 2009). For layersthat provided comprehensive coverage of the trawl footprints (i.e., depth classes, ecosections, benthic classes, andrugosity), we tallied the area in km 2 of each benthic class or ‘habitat type’ within the dominant ecosections wherethe trawl fishery operates, and compared that to the area inside the historic footprint and proposed new boundaries.Adjustments to the new footprint were iterative and the process included in-depth consultations with trawl fishermenand with other environmental organisations. The environmental groups also identified and mapped two types ofareas at risk to future habitat damage that remained within the footprint. Areas of historically repeated bycatch ofcoral and sponge were delineated using coral and sponge bycatch data and areas previously untrawled but remaininginside the footprint were identified.ResultsThe groundfish bottom trawl footprint or allowable area for this fishery, previously without depth restriction, wasreduced to the most important areas. Overall, the total area was decreased by 20% and the deepest fishing area, below1000 m, was decreased by 65% (Figure 1). We did not succeed in limiting overlap of the agreed upon footprintto 50% or less in every depth class (Table 1). Some areas inside the footprint remain untrawled but were required foroperations (e.g., vessel and net manoeuvring) and some areas have seen very little effort (2–10 tows). These considerationsare not taken into account in Table 1.Although the environmental groups tried to have additional areas of high risk of future habitat damage removedfrom the footprint, industry declined because some of the areas were historically important and productive fishinggrounds and/or were required for operations. It was expected that non-spatial management measures would mitigatebycatch concerns. The non-spatial measures included a system of individual vessel bycatch limits designed to providea disincentive for fishing in potentially risky areas within the footprint. Since it was impossible to identify everypossible area with corals and sponges, this system of individual vessel bycatch quotas was viewed as the mosteffective way of providing protection to sensitive areas remaining within the footprint, as long as it was well enforced.The observer program, with 100% coverage, provides the means for effective enforcement. In addition, an192
11 th International Symposium for GIS and Computer Cartography for Coastal Zones Managementencounter protocol or rapid-response procedure was established. In the event of a tow with bycatch of coral andsponge combined exceeding 20 kilograms, the location is immediately communicated to other bottom trawl vessels.The limited individual vessel bycatch quota provides the incentive to re-direct fishing effort to another area. Bycatchof any amount is also tallied daily and made available to the trawl industry by DFO. Finally, a habitat review committeehas been established to review and assess the measures annually. In particular, compliance, area fished, quotatransfers, hot spot areas, and reporting are to be assessed.Figure 1. Revised groundfish bottom trawl boundary, areas previously unimpacted within the boundary, and areas previouslytrawled but now closed to the fishery.ConclusionThe collaborative effort to develop innovative conservation measures designed to benefit both the groundfishtrawl industry and conservation was supported by good spatial data and careful analyses. It would have been challengingto assess the proportion of habitat types impacted by the fishery without data compiled and made availableby the British Columbia Marine Conservation Analysis (BCMCA). The results of spatial analyses that identifiedhigh risk areas, including areas of historically higher coral and sponge bycatch and areas previously unimpacted,provide a useful benchmark for annual assessment of the success of the measures. The new management measureswere implemented through Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Groundfish Integrated Fisheries Management Plan, effectiveApril 2, 2012. In the first year of implementation there were four encounters with greater than 20 kilogramsbycatch of corals or sponges. Three out of four high bycatch encounters occurred in an area identified as high risk by193
Page 1 and 2:
CoastGIS Conference 2013: Monitorin
Page 3 and 4:
Sponsors
Page 5 and 6:
Steering Committee Secretariat main
Page 7 and 8:
Santos Basin, BrazilA.F. Romero, R.
Page 9 and 10:
Coastline development and associate
Page 11 and 12:
Visual resource management system f
Page 13 and 14:
11 th International Symposium for G
Page 15 and 16:
Use of Terrestrial-LiDAR for quanti
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Community beach monitoring: utilisi
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Data policy implications arising fr
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Global ocean observing system for w
Page 35 and 36:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
ResultsMetadata11 th International
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Coastal vulnerability index to glob
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
generating probabilities contours f
Page 58 and 59:
maps, the most critical conditions
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Statistical and spatial toolbox for
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Global oceans and marine planning
Page 74 and 75:
Analysis11 th International Symposi
Page 76 and 77:
Building scenarios and visualizatio
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Using a 3D physics-based visualizat
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Documenting situated tsunami risk p
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
SeaSketch11 th International Sympos
Page 94 and 95:
A structured model to enable coasta
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Developing and testing approaches f
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
A dynamic GIS as an efficient tool
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
GIS spatio-temporal modeling of hum
Page 108 and 109:
ResultsCollected data11 th Internat
Page 110 and 111:
The use of GIS and geospatial techn
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Ocean Radar for Monitoring of the C
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Geophysical investigations of marin
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
A semi-supervised learning framewor
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Simulation of maritime paths taking
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
COINAtlantic: Sharing through open
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Implementation of the marine data i
Page 136 and 137:
Perspectives11 th International Sym
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
References11 th International Sympo
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153: 11 th International Symposium for G
Page 156 and 157: Conclusion11 th International Sympo
Page 170 and 171: Tools and best practices for coasta
Page 178 and 179: Washington Coastal Atlas: creating
Page 182 and 183: The African Coastal and Marine Atla
Page 198 and 199: Methods11 th International Symposiu
Page 208 and 209: Acknowledgments11 th International
Page 216 and 217: Long-term continuous observations o
Page 220 and 221: Comparing endmember extraction meth
Page 224 and 225: Integration of scientific data as a
Page 230: Conclusions11 th International Symp
show all

Download PDF - COINAtlantic

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?