Download PDF - COINAtlantic

More documents

Recommendations

Info

11 th International Symposium for GIS and Computer Cartography for Coastal Zones ManagementVides M., P.C. Sierra-Correa, T. Devisscher, F. Arias and T.E. Downing (2008), Sea-level Rise Coastal AdaptationBuilding Capacity in two Vulnerable Areas of the Colombian Coastal Area. Colombia - Synthesis Document. TheNetherlands Climate Assistance Program (NCAP) Phase II. Santa Marta, Colombia, 45 p.Vides M.P., P.C. Sierra-Correa and L. Cortés (2013), La gestión costera como respuesta al ascenso del nivel del mar.Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras “José Benito Vives de Andreis” – INVEMAR. Santa Marta,Colombia, 76p.CLIMARES webpage http://cambioclimatico.invemar.org.co/ 23-01-2013GEOVISOR http://gis.invemar.org.co/cdkn/ 23-01-201380
Designing for our oceans: GeoDesign, science and marine spatial planningEvan PaulMarine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, California, 93106, USAetp@msi.ucsb.eduAbstractMarine spatial planning (MSP) requires the use of decision support tools for visualizing, analyzing and modelinggeospatial information. For marine issues, these tools have historically been designed for those with specializedknowledge of geographic information systems (GIS) and not for the average stakeholder—people with little or noscientific or technical background. California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative pioneered the use of GeoDesigntechnologies with MarineMap (www.marinemap.org) for marine protected area planning, allowing stakeholders topropose and implement science-based MPA networks.Leveraging open-source and ESRI technologies, SeaSketch (www.seasketch.org) is a “next-generation” marinespatial planning tool developed for world-wide, collaborative GeoDesign developed at the UCSB Marine ScienceInstitute. I will present the essential features of MarineMap and SeaSketch to illustrate how web-based GeoDesigntechnologies will transform how citizens are engaged in and ultimately responsible for how ocean space is used andmanaged using (or rejecting) the best available science.IntroductionIt is commonly acknowledged that, ideally, marine spatial planning maximizes stakeholder involvement. Whiletechnology alone cannot guarantee effective and empowered stakeholder engagement (McCall, 2003), ensuringaccessible technologies is often a necessary precondition for effective involvement (Craig et al., 2002). Despite this,many of the technologies used in marine spatial planning to date have required experience and training in scienceand GIS. These geospatial applications and modeling tools have often been difficult to master for the average stakeholderand, in some cases, use of these tools has bred suspicion or resentment by those who could not use or understandthem.Between 1999 and 2004, scientists advised the California Department of Fish and Game on potential plans for anetwork of marine protected areas (MPAs) in state waters. However, because stakeholders were not adequatelyinvolved in the development of these plans, and because the tools used by scientists were opaque and eyed withsuspicion, the plans were rejected. Subsequently, the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative (MLPAI) was establishedand tasked stakeholders with developing plans for a statewide network of MPAs (Gleason et al., 2010). In the followingsix years, the McClintock Lab developed MarineMap (www.marinemap.org), a web-based application foruse by stakeholders to design MPAs based on science and policy guidelines (Merrifield et al., 2012). This paperdescribes the essential features of MarineMap, how they have been carried over in the next-generation tool calledSeaSketch (www.seasketch.org), and how stakeholders may use these tools to use (or reject) scientific informationand advice in the design of marine spatial plans.MarineMapIn MarineMap, users could display maps, sketch marine protected area proposals, generate analytical reports, andshare proposals with others. MarineMap made participation much more accessible by enabling stakeholders to participateremotely at any time of their choosing or in face-to-face meetings. MarineMap's analytical reports had beentailored to the MLPAI, which enabled participants to better understand their and others’ proposals in the context ofwhat that particular planning process was working to achieve. The fast and stable performance of MarineMap, particularlyin comparison with many desktop applications, enabled stakeholders to generate over 30,000 differentMPA proposals, each with an associated analytical report. In 2010, the MarineMap Consortium received an Innovationin Technology award from the US Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution(www.ecr.gov/AnnouncementsEvents/AnnouncementsEvents.aspx?Item=69).81
Page 1 and 2:
CoastGIS Conference 2013: Monitorin
Page 3 and 4:
Sponsors
Page 5 and 6:
Steering Committee Secretariat main
Page 7 and 8:
Santos Basin, BrazilA.F. Romero, R.
Page 9 and 10:
Coastline development and associate
Page 11 and 12:
Visual resource management system f
Page 13 and 14:
11 th International Symposium for G
Page 15 and 16:
Use of Terrestrial-LiDAR for quanti
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Community beach monitoring: utilisi
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Data policy implications arising fr
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Global ocean observing system for w
Page 35 and 36:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41: 11 th International Symposium for G
Page 46 and 47: ResultsMetadata11 th International
Page 52 and 53: Coastal vulnerability index to glob
Page 56 and 57: generating probabilities contours f
Page 58 and 59: maps, the most critical conditions
Page 68 and 69: Statistical and spatial toolbox for
Page 72 and 73: Global oceans and marine planning
Page 74 and 75: Analysis11 th International Symposi
Page 76 and 77: Building scenarios and visualizatio
Page 80 and 81: Using a 3D physics-based visualizat
Page 84 and 85: Documenting situated tsunami risk p
Page 92 and 93: SeaSketch11 th International Sympos
Page 94 and 95: A structured model to enable coasta
Page 98 and 99: Developing and testing approaches f
Page 102 and 103: A dynamic GIS as an efficient tool
Page 106 and 107: GIS spatio-temporal modeling of hum
Page 108 and 109: ResultsCollected data11 th Internat
Page 110 and 111: The use of GIS and geospatial techn
Page 114 and 115: Ocean Radar for Monitoring of the C
Page 118 and 119: Geophysical investigations of marin
Page 122 and 123: A semi-supervised learning framewor
Page 126 and 127: Simulation of maritime paths taking
Page 130 and 131: COINAtlantic: Sharing through open
Page 134 and 135: Implementation of the marine data i
Page 136 and 137: Perspectives11 th International Sym
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
References11 th International Sympo
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Conclusion11 th International Sympo
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Tools and best practices for coasta
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Washington Coastal Atlas: creating
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
The African Coastal and Marine Atla
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Methods11 th International Symposiu
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Methods11 th International Symposiu
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Acknowledgments11 th International
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Long-term continuous observations o
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Comparing endmember extraction meth
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Integration of scientific data as a
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230:
Conclusions11 th International Symp
show all

Download PDF - COINAtlantic

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?