162 ANDREA GRAZIOSIarchives many letters from Sergo to Stalin and the CC, accompanied bynotes from Piatakov that ask Sergo to write, adding "esli mozhno, ia proektpis'ma sostavil"). It was Piatakov who chose much of the higher echelonsof the commissariat, on the basis of merit, competence, and devotion (inthis regard, it is striking to read what Barmine writes about the differencebetween Piatakov's and Voroshilov's collaborators during those years). 44 Itwas he who made the NKTP into a "reactionary" structure, as some Americanauthors have written, grotesquely commenting on the prevalence ofpeople with higher education and of "dubious" social origin in its leadership.It was he who perfected the cultivated version of those methods tokeep the bureaucratic machine under pressure, later described by Век inNovoe naznachenie. And it was he who decided, in general terms at least, 45which factories were to be built and where, following the plans eleboratedat the OSVOK during the previous decade and brought up to date by thelarge conference on the raionirovanie of industry in the Second Five-YearPlan.Piatakov was inspired by the same idea of the 1920s: to build a largemodern system of state industry, this time limited to heavy industry,because of the retreat we have mentioned. This program was facilitated bythe physical existence abroad of the blueprints to follow, which made itpossible for the "planners" to give themselves definite goals for industrialinvestments. But the amount of effort required should not be underestimated:it can be judged by thinking of the difficulties involved in thesimultaneous creation of whole interdependent sectors of industry.The results of this effort were surprising. By the middle of 1934, thelong-desired, modern "system of state industry" existed and functioned. Butits productivity was low and this clashed with the tenets of its creators, Piatakovand Ordzhonikidze in particular. They believed such a system to befar superior to its "capitalist" competitors; thus, in their eyes, low productivitycould only be some sort of teething problem to be speedily overcomeby forcing the cadres and the work force of Soviet industry to make greatstrides, at the same time taking measures to better their living conditions—something made possible by the previously won victories (Piatakov thendefended, in opposition to M. Kaganovich, a "paternalistic-progressive"44The quality of the upper echelons is one of the fundamental variables in the working of allbureaucratic systems, which are basically "subjective" systems. Its importance increases withthese systems' degree of "purity," i.e., with the increasing lack of social and economic counterweightsto the bureaucracies' actions.45Stalin and the "little Stalins" had, of course, their "favorite" projects, their hobby-horses,like Karaganda or the great canals. This was yet another cause of both changes in the plans andwaste of resources.
PIATAKOV: A MIRROR OF SOVIET HISTORY 163style of management, strongly reminiscent of his father's, which was,perhaps, <strong>also</strong> to be extended to forced labor).Beginning with the end of 1934, on the basis of these self-delusions, theleaders of the NKTP began to push for rapid increases in productivity. Butthe well-known difficulties of the Soviet system, primarily those connectedwith the organization of supplies, frustrated their efforts. Increases in productivitywere obtained, such as those any system can give, especially if itis "new," well-directed, and under pressure, but these increases were wellbelow expectations. A perverse mechanism was thus created inside thecommissariat, whereby its leadership no longer trusted the intentions andabilities of its subordinates. This lack of trust took on various forms, andalongside Piatakov's "rational" doubts and his attempts to elaborate policiesto reverse the situation, the psychological mechanisms, methods, and thefaith in "miracles" of 1928-1930, which had appeared to be overcome,now resurfaced in Ordzhonikidze.It was in this climate that, in the autumn of 1935, Stakhanovismappeared (in the Donbass, which was, as in the Civil War, in 1921, or in1928, the natural breeding ground for Stalin's initiatives). The phenomenonof Stakhanovism and its origins are complex, but it is certain that Stalin andhis circle were quick to seize it as a tool to attack the NKTP. Because of thestate of mind just described, for long months its leaders (and especially thenaive Ordzhonikidze) not only did not answer this attack, but took part in it,actively collaborating in their own destruction.The liquidation of the NKTP was, partly for this reason, a relativelyrapid affair. In June 1936 the battle had already been won. In July Piatakovlost his post as first deputy commissar. In September he was arrested, andthen, in swift succession, tortured, tried, and shot at the end of January1937. A few weeks later, after a violent quarrel with Stalin, Ordzhonikidzecommitted suicide.Thus, another important obstacle to the affirmation of pure despotism,another of the great "vice-royalties" created in the first half of the 1930s,was liquidated. That this is what was in fact happening is confirmed by therapid crumbling of the commissariat itself, which had already begun duringthe last weeks of Ordzhonikidze's life. In December 1936, the war industrywas detached from the NKTP and constituted as an independent commissariat.A year later, most of the leadership of the old NKTP had beenpurged, and in the place of one single large body there were three independentcommissariats. By 1941, the total number of commissariats createdfrom the destruction of the NKTP had reached seventeen.
- Page 1 and 2:
HARVARDUKRAINIAN STUDIESVolume XVI
- Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTSARTICLESOn the Chronology o
- Page 5:
Bella Gutterman, Be-vo ha-Ayma: Yeh
- Page 8 and 9:
8 OMELJANPRITSAKIcelandic data on
- Page 10 and 11:
10 OMELJANPRITSAKsinum ос moöur
- Page 12 and 13:
12 OMELJANPRITSAKhann itrygô at ra
- Page 14 and 15:
14 OMELJAN PRITSAK1.5.The anonymous
- Page 16 and 17:
16 OMEUAN PRUSAKmep jHİmr skipsogn
- Page 18 and 19:
18 OMELJANPRITSAKdrápa, which was
- Page 20 and 21:
20 OMELJANPRITSAKILI.Before analyzi
- Page 22 and 23:
22 OMELJANPRITSAKsumar Alexius Grik
- Page 24 and 25:
24 OMELJANPRITSAK9. ОТ was king o
- Page 26 and 27:
26 OMELJANPRITSAKThat slaying occur
- Page 28 and 29:
28 OMEUANPRTTSAKembarked on his com
- Page 30 and 31:
30 OMELJANPRITSAKUppsala, Eirikr in
- Page 32 and 33:
32 OMELJANPRITSAKLicicaviki," appea
- Page 34 and 35:
34 OMELJANPRITSAK1) The saga can ha
- Page 36 and 37:
36 OMELJANPRITSAKLIST OF ABBREVIATI
- Page 38 and 39:
38 HARVEY GOLDBLATTalmost all his a
- Page 40 and 41:
40 HARVEY GOLDBLATTspirituality who
- Page 42 and 43:
42 HARVEY GOLDBLATTIn the second pl
- Page 44 and 45:
44 HARVEY GOLDBLATTCyrrhus, Heraıi
- Page 46 and 47:
46 HARVEY GOLDBLATThowever, it is n
- Page 48 and 49:
48 HARVEY GOLDBLATTIn seeking to co
- Page 50 and 51:
50 HARVEY GOLDBLATThave cared littl
- Page 52 and 53:
52 HARVEY GOLDBLATTsemantic link, o
- Page 54 and 55:
54 HARVEY GOLDBLATTsource for the t
- Page 56 and 57:
56 HARVEY GOLDBLATTSpirit;" 79 and
- Page 58 and 59:
58 HARVEY GOLDBLATTAntioch and as a
- Page 60 and 61:
60 HARVEY GOLDBLATTheresy. 101 Here
- Page 62 and 63:
62 HARVEY GOLDBLATTseverely punishe
- Page 64 and 65:
64 HARVEY GOLDBLATTevangelical patt
- Page 66 and 67:
66 HARVEY GOLDBLATTThus, in the str
- Page 68 and 69:
68 PETER A. ROLLANDknowledge of con
- Page 70 and 71:
70 PETER A. ROLLANDAmong Soviet sch
- Page 72 and 73:
72 PETER A. ROLLANDbolorum et Emble
- Page 74 and 75:
74 PETER A. ROLLANDUnderneath this
- Page 76 and 77:
76 PETER A. ROLLANDsuggestive vocab
- Page 78 and 79:
78 PETER A. ROLLANDKorony, berła,
- Page 80 and 81:
80 PETER A. ROLLANDby their crown,
- Page 82 and 83:
82 PETER A. ROLLANDboth Polacki's w
- Page 84 and 85:
84 PETER A. ROLLANDBogactwo z corą
- Page 86 and 87:
86 PETER A. ROLLANDone path or the
- Page 88 and 89:
88 DARIUSZ KOŁODZIEJCZYKthe sixtee
- Page 90 and 91:
90 DARIUSZ KOŁODZIEJCZYKeffective
- Page 92 and 93:
92 DARIUSZ KOŁODZIEJCZYKcampaign)
- Page 94 and 95:
94 DARIUSZ KOŁODZIEJCZYKAfter thre
- Page 96 and 97:
96 DARIUSZ KOŁODZIEJCZYKis not to
- Page 98 and 99:
98 DARIUSZ KOŁODZIEJCZYKConsiderin
- Page 100 and 101:
BEYLERBEYIS OF KAWJANEC'*8Nicknames
- Page 102 and 103:
G. L. Piatakov (1890-1937): A Mirro
- Page 104 and 105:
104 ANDREA GRAZIOSILastly, Piatakov
- Page 106 and 107:
106 ANDREA GRAZIOSIfirst system of
- Page 108 and 109:
108 ANDREA GRAZIOSIextreme economic
- Page 110 and 111:
110 ANDREA GRAZIOSIThe third knot i
- Page 112 and 113: 112 ANDREA GRAZIOSIPiatakov's other
- Page 114 and 115: 114 ANDREA GRAZIOSItoo, the moment
- Page 116 and 117: 116 ANDREA GRAZIOSIthat had spread
- Page 118 and 119: 118 ANDREA GRAZIOSIOrdzhonikidze—
- Page 120 and 121: 120 ANDREA GRAZIOSIfather (freed in
- Page 122 and 123: 122 ANDREA GRAZIOSIhave already men
- Page 124 and 125: 124 ANDREA GRAZIOSIOn the personal
- Page 126 and 127: 126 ANDREA GRAZIOSIcommon cause, di
- Page 128 and 129: 128 ANDREA GRAZIOSIStalin's influen
- Page 130 and 131: 130 ANDREA GRAZIOSIlatter, Trotsky
- Page 132 and 133: 132 ANDREA GRAZIOSImain leaders of
- Page 134 and 135: 134 ANDREA GRAZIOSIBut Stalin, too,
- Page 136 and 137: 136 ANDREA GRAZIOSIeconomic region,
- Page 138 and 139: 138 ANDREA GRAZIOSIUkraine between
- Page 140 and 141: 140 ANDREA GRAZIOSIThe offer was ac
- Page 142 and 143: 142 ANDREA GRAZIOSIKarelian leaders
- Page 144 and 145: 144 ANDREA GRAZIOSIThis time, to be
- Page 146 and 147: 146 ANDREA GRAZIOSIthe expected "so
- Page 148 and 149: 148 ANDREA GRAZIOSIconducted negoti
- Page 150 and 151: 150 ANDREA GRAZIOSIIn October 1925,
- Page 152 and 153: 152 ANDREA GRAZIOSIsocioeconomic fo
- Page 154 and 155: 154 ANDREA GRAZIOSI"harnessing of a
- Page 156 and 157: 156 ANDREA GRAZIOSIsection), which
- Page 158 and 159: 158 ANDREA GRAZIOSIThe ideas and co
- Page 160 and 161: 160 ANDREA GRAZIOSIletter to Dzerzh
- Page 164 and 165: 164 ANDREA GRAZIOSIThe Soviet syste
- Page 166 and 167: 166 ANDREA GRAZIOSIabout the inner
- Page 168 and 169: 168 В. N. FLORJAof the history of
- Page 170 and 171: 170 В. N. FLORJAthe Lviv Chronicle
- Page 172 and 173: 172 В. N. FLORJATranscription(CGAD
- Page 174 and 175: ESSAY*Ukraine between East and West
- Page 176 and 177: 176 ШСЖ SEVĞENKOof the West and
- Page 178 and 179: 178 fflOR SEVCENKOVenetian elements
- Page 180 and 181: 180 IHORSEVCENKOMoscow with the unl
- Page 182 and 183: 182 fflORSEVCENKOeighteenth centuri
- Page 184 and 185: REVIEW ARTICLESA Bibliographic Key
- Page 186 and 187: 186 MARTA TARNAWSKYthought-out and
- Page 188 and 189: 188 MARTA TARNAWSKYResearch Institu
- Page 190 and 191: 190 MARTA TARNAWSKYreading and the
- Page 192 and 193: The Captivated Mind: Two Studies of
- Page 194 and 195: 194 HAROLD B. SEGELmay never have e
- Page 196 and 197: 196 HAROLD B. SEGELRomantic outlook
- Page 198 and 199: 198 HAROLD B. SEGELhave come, but a
- Page 200 and 201: 200 ReviewsThe number of entries (a
- Page 202 and 203: 202 ReviewsThe richest part of the
- Page 204 and 205: 204 Reviewsamount of printing error
- Page 206 and 207: 206 Reviewswith the original French
- Page 208 and 209: 208 Reviewstraditional naked Christ
- Page 210 and 211: 210 ReviewsHnatenko, p. 15M. Гол
- Page 212 and 213:
212 Reviewscraft from books rather
- Page 214 and 215:
214 ReviewsA similar, albeit less r
- Page 216 and 217:
216 ReviewsPEASANTS WITH PROMISE: U
- Page 218 and 219:
218 Reviewsof that officer corps wh
- Page 220 and 221:
220 Reviewsthey remained pro-Bolshe
- Page 222 and 223:
222 Reviewsreference are given on t
- Page 224 and 225:
224 ReviewsTHE NATIONALITIES FACTOR
- Page 226 and 227:
226 Reviewsamply discuss, for examp
- Page 228 and 229:
228 ReviewsTwo of the diaries chose
- Page 230 and 231:
230 Reviewsshort biography of the a
- Page 232 and 233:
232 ReviewsHolocaust survivors from
- Page 234 and 235:
234 ReviewsJewish organizations, on
- Page 236 and 237:
236 ReviewsWhile Narys Istorii cont