Report - Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia - NRE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Simple – clear and direct and readily understood by allstakeholders – is it easy to get the information without expertassistance? 14Accordingly the Progress Implementation Review (PIR) indicators should beupdated to be more relevant for the remainder of the project. This will alsoimprove the relevance of the reporting against the indicators. The processof revising the indicators should be undertaken by the UNDP PO and thePMU team based on the objectives and outputs of the project.3.2. Implementation approachContextImplementing partner: Government of Malaysia (GoM)Executing Agency: Ministry of Natural Resources and EnvironmentImplementing Agency: Department of Marine Park MalaysiaDuration: 5 yearsThe project is implemented through a partnership approach between UNDPand GoM. The UNDP strategic focal area for this project is environment andsustainable development. 15“Overall, UNDP supports national processes to accelerate the progress ofhuman development with a view to eradicate poverty through development,equitable and sustained economic growth, and capacity development. Thismeans that all UNDP policy advice, technical support, advocacy, andcontributions to strengthening coherence in global development must beaimed at one end result: real improvements in people’s lives and in thechoices and opportunities open to.” 1614 Four criteria for choosing indicators are summarised by the acronym AIMS15 United Nations Development Programme and Project Management Overview16 Ibid10
17The diagram omits the Community Consultation Committee. This could beinserted below the 3 project sites with a straight line connection tostakeholders or inserted between the project officers and the stakeholders,with a straight t line connection to Project officers and stakeholders.EvaluationThe implementation approach follows the Inception Report and the UNDPproject modality. The project outcomes, outputs and activities further definethe approach.The Inception Workshop made some changes to the project outputshowever the strategy remained unchanged. The main changes were thereduction in the number of outputs from 40 to 10 to simplify delivery andtracking, and reduction of the project sites from 4 to 3.During the inception phase in 2007 (workshop held 7-9 September 2007 andfinal Inception Report 28 December 2007) the DMPM was established (July2007) as a department of the Ministry of Natural Resources andEnvironment (NRE). The first meeting of the NSC was held on 14November 2007 at which the committee was established, the draft InceptionReport and its implementation were considered and the participation of the“green agencies” was encouraged.Technical support and backstopping is provided by the UNDP. Projectdelivery is managed by a Project Management Unit (PMU) comprising aNational Project Director, and a National Project Manager and support staff17 From the NPD presentation to the MTR – Slide 611
Page 1: Conserving Marine Biodiversity thro
Page 4 and 5: • To strengthen the capacity of t
Page 6 and 7: 1.1.2. UNDPAs the project design do
Page 8 and 9: 1.2.8. NSC and SSC - expand members
Page 10 and 11: 1.2.17. NPD and PMU - role clarityC
Page 12 and 13: 2. LESSONS LEARNEDThis section iden
Page 14 and 15: 2.8. Recruitment of key staff with
Page 17: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONSAPR Annua
Page 20 and 21: 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 376.1. Correctiv
Page 22 and 23: 1.3. Methodology of the evaluationT
Page 24 and 25: 2. THE PROJECT AND ITS DEVELOPMENTC
Page 26 and 27: • Department of Wildlife and Nati
Page 28 and 29: 3. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS3.1. Pro
Page 32 and 33: and initially including three Fishe
Page 34 and 35: These responsibilities (marine and
Page 36 and 37: • Awareness raising with local co
Page 39 and 40: EvaluationThe approach taken by UND
Page 41 and 42: longstanding and established relati
Page 43 and 44: 4.2. Monitoring and evaluationConte
Page 45 and 46: Evaluation• Executing Agency: The
Page 47 and 48: EvaluationCo ordination has improve
Page 49 and 50: OVERALL GOAL:Enhanced marine park m
Page 51 and 52: DMPM didn’t act as quickly as the
Page 53 and 54: ImpactFactors beyondthe project’s
Page 55 and 56: To ensure sustainability ongoing ef
Page 57 and 58: 6. RECOMMENDATIONS6.1. Corrective a
Page 59 and 60: 6.2.6. DMPM - general awareness rai
Page 61 and 62: 6.2.16. PMU - strategic communicati
Page 63 and 64: 6.3.2. DMPMDMPM consider how the in
Page 65 and 66: Environmental management on islands
Page 67 and 68: a) Monitor and evaluate results and
Page 69 and 70: To assess overall performance again
Page 71 and 72: 4. lessons from other relevant proj
Page 73 and 74: - Substantive knowledge of particip
Page 75 and 76: Appendix 2: List of interviewees an
Page 77 and 78: Stakeholder MeetingDate: 24 Nov 201
Page 79 and 80: Stakeholder Meeting (Marine Park St
Page 81 and 82:
Stakeholder Meeting (NGO - Reefchec
Page 83 and 84:
5. Johor National Parks Corporation
Page 85 and 86:
APPENDIX 4: Photographs of the mid-
Page 87 and 88:
• Financial reports:− Annual wo
show all

Report - Jabatan Taman Laut Malaysia - NRE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?