World Investment Report 2009: Transnational Corporations - Unctad
World Investment Report 2009: Transnational Corporations - Unctad
World Investment Report 2009: Transnational Corporations - Unctad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2009</strong>: <strong>Transnational</strong> <strong>Corporations</strong>, Agricultural Production and Development<br />
countries. The parties agreed that investment issues<br />
will be dealt with through BITs between Singapore<br />
and individual GCC member countries.<br />
In Africa, countries relied on regional<br />
������������ �������������� ��� ���������� ����� ����<br />
framework agreements. The United States concluded<br />
a Trade and <strong>Investment</strong> Framework Agreement<br />
(TIFA) with the East African Community (EAC) and<br />
a Trade and <strong>Investment</strong> Cooperative Agreement with<br />
the Southern African Customs Union (SACU). These<br />
agreements establish an institutional framework to<br />
monitor trade and investment relations between the<br />
parties and to consider ways to promote investment<br />
(see annex table A.I.13).<br />
d. Investor-State dispute settlement<br />
In parallel with the expanding IIA regime,<br />
the number of investor-State disputes has remained<br />
relatively high. The cumulative number of known<br />
treaty-based cases had reached 317 by end 2008<br />
(figure I.25). 56 In 2008, at least 30 new treaty-based<br />
investor-State dispute cases were filed, 21 of them with<br />
the International Centre for Settlement of <strong>Investment</strong><br />
Disputes (ICSID). While this was lower than in<br />
2007, when 35 new cases were filed, it is nonetheless<br />
considerably higher than those filed before 2002.<br />
Since ICSID is the only arbitration facility to maintain<br />
a public registry, the actual number of treaty-based<br />
cases is likely to be higher.<br />
The rise in disputes continues to affect many<br />
countries. In fact, at least 77 governments – 47 in<br />
developing countries, 17 in developed countries and 13<br />
in transition economies – were involved in investment<br />
treaty arbitration by the end of 2008. Argentina still<br />
tops the list with 48 claims lodged against it, two of<br />
which were brought in 2008. Mexico is second, with<br />
��� ������ �������� ��������� ��� ���� ������ ���������<br />
(15) and Ecuador (14). Countries with a relatively<br />
large number of new known cases in<br />
2008 included: Ecuador (4), Ukraine<br />
(4) and Georgia (3). Three countries<br />
faced arbitration for the first time in<br />
�������������������������������������<br />
As many as 92% of known claims<br />
(317) were initiated by investors from<br />
developed countries, whereas by the<br />
end of 2008, there were 20 cases filed<br />
by investors from developing countries<br />
and 9 from transition economies. Of<br />
the 96 cases concluded by end 2008, 51<br />
were decided in favour of the State, and<br />
45 in favour of the investor, although<br />
four of these cases are still pending<br />
before an ICSID annulment committee.<br />
At the same time, 48 cases were<br />
discontinued following settlement, 142<br />
Number of IIAs (other than BITs and DTTs)<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Figure I.23. Distribution of DTTs concluded at end-<br />
2008, by country group<br />
(Per cent)<br />
���<br />
���<br />
��<br />
Source: UNCTAD (www.unctad.org/iia).<br />
���<br />
������� ��������� ���������<br />
������� ��������� ��������� ��� ��� � ���<br />
������� ���������� ��������� ��� ��� � ���<br />
������� ��������� ���������<br />
������� ��������� ��� ���������� ���������<br />
������� ���������� ���������<br />
��<br />
���<br />
cases were still pending and for 31 cases the status<br />
was unknown.<br />
The large majority of cases were initiated on<br />
the grounds of violating a BIT provision. The BIT<br />
between Argentina and the United States leads with<br />
18 claims, followed by the BIT between Ecuador<br />
and the United States and that between the Republic<br />
of Moldova and the Russian Federation, with nine<br />
claims each. With regard to regional and plurilateral<br />
international investment agreements, the North<br />
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) alone was<br />
used in 48 claims while the Energy Charter Treaty<br />
(ECT) was used for at least 20 claims. 57 The Central<br />
American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) has been<br />
used in at least two claims since its entry into force.<br />
This shows that investors are increasingly using<br />
investment chapters of free trade agreements (FTAs)<br />
for filing claims against host States.<br />
Figure I.24. Number of IIAs concluded at end-2008,<br />
cumulative and per period<br />
1957–1967 1968–1978 1979–1989 1990–2000 2001–2008<br />
Source: UNCTAD (www.unctad.org/iia).<br />
By period Cumulative