-11o-(a)(b)(c)(d)Inerting system <strong>for</strong> cargo holds and other unmanned spaces asrequired, including type of gas, dispersion of gas throughout thecargo, methods of gas-freeing the spaces and extent to which gasfreeingis required <strong>for</strong> human safety.Optimum insulation system(s) <strong>for</strong> vertical and horizontal surfacesin the Engine Room, accommodations and other working or livingspace.Composition of deck covering to limit surface temperature to therequired 400 degrees F.Discussions with U. S. Coast Guard to determine the extent offire protection required in the deckhouse. The present study isbased upon full compliance with the intent of current U. S.Coast Guard requirements. However, a lesser degree of protectionhas been accepted in previous <strong>aluminum</strong> deckhouses, though thesewere installed on steel <strong>hull</strong>s.DESIGN CRITERIASeveral factors entering into the establishment of <strong>design</strong> criteriarequire further clarification, including the following:(a)(b)(c)The question of <strong>design</strong> stresses <strong>for</strong> welded <strong>structures</strong> is notfully clarified. At present, a ‘Iwelded’lyield based upon the0.2 per cent offset in a 10 inch gage length is proposed,rather than the prime or O-temper values. However, thisaverage <strong>design</strong> stress may not adequately account <strong>for</strong> thestructural response in way of the heat-affected zone, whichis the weak link in the structural system, since the use of a10 inch gage length in lieu of a 2 inch gage length tends todiminish the apparent effects of this degradation.The relative importance of yield and ultimate strengths in convertingfrom steel to <strong>aluminum</strong> requires further consideration.In specific cases, the equal ranking used in this study may notbe optimum.The question of safety factors should be considered when thevariability in structural per<strong>for</strong>mance due to the human elementin fabrication is better understood. The use of identical safetyfactors <strong>for</strong> <strong>aluminum</strong> and steel <strong>design</strong>s implies that the conversionof raw materials into a fabricated product produces identicalstress concentration and residual stress effects which may not betrue. The entire question of residual stress levels must beinvestigated.DEFLECTIONSThese studies indicate that <strong>hull</strong> deflection should not be a limitingfactor in itself as long as the <strong>hull</strong> length/depth ratio con<strong>for</strong>ms to ~reseutstandards, and stresses are kept reasonable low. However, the quest>on ofallowableextensiveshould be<strong>hull</strong> girder deflecti~ns deserves” further study-in via of thebody of opinion among Regulato~ Agencies that such limitationsestablished.
111-FATIGUE STRXNGTHAs noted earlier in this report, there are a number of factors relatingto alloy fatigue strengths which require further clarification and testing.Foremost among these is the question of fatigue strength in the presence ofsalt spray. This requires an extensive test program, incorporating thefollowing variables: intensity of salt spray, effect of fillet and buttwelds, alloys (plate and extrusion tempm) bead-on versus bead-off. Additionaltesting of extrusion tempers would also be advisable, in both thewelded and unwelded condition.FRACTURE TOUGHNESSFurther testing is required to determine the relative quantitativefracture toughness of <strong>aluminum</strong> and steel <strong>for</strong> comparison with anticipatedstress levels. These tests should evaluate the following variables:directionality (transverseversus longitudinal), welding and other fabricationprocedures, environment (sea water versus salt spray), effects ofrepeated.loads, and alloys (plate and extrusion tempers).CORROSION AND ABRASIONThe etioliation resistance of ~083 alloy should be tested to determineif an HI17 temper is required. I?wcthertesting on the relative abrasionresistance of <strong>aluminum</strong> and mild steel is also required.DESIGN DETAILSA study should be initiated to standardize <strong>design</strong> details <strong>for</strong> <strong>aluminum</strong>ship <strong>structures</strong>, both to facilitate fabrication and to prevent excessiveresidual stress build-up and subsequent cracking. This is a vital stepwhich must be taken be<strong>for</strong>e a large <strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong> can be built, if structuralfailur@s are to be avoided. Specific areas to be detailed would ii-icludeend connections of intercostal stiffeners, connection of continuousstiffeners to web frames or other supports, stanchion endings, proportionsof stiffeners, relief of hard spots and other stress raisers, requiredclearances <strong>for</strong> proper welding. The required size and continuity of filletwelds requires further study, as there is presem~ly a significant di~ferencebetween Navy and commercial requirements.VI.CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSCONCLUSIONSThe conclusions to be de~ived from this Feasibility Study <strong>for</strong> anAluminum Bulk Carrier are summarized below:1. General - The construction of a bulk carrier utilizing <strong>aluminum</strong>alloy <strong>for</strong> the <strong>hull</strong> structure is technically feasible witiin the presentstate-of-the-artin shipbuilding, but is not economically justified indirect competition with a steel vessel of equivalent capabilities.2. Review of Aluminum Alloys - The present S000 series <strong>aluminum</strong>alloys being considered (s0s2, 5083, 5086, 5154, 5454 and 5456) havesufficiently high welded mechanical and physical properties <strong>for</strong> the proposedapplication, though additional research is required in the area of
- Page 5:
CONTENTSI.. II.III.Iv.v.VI ●VII.I
- Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF FIGURES(Cent’d)FIGURE NO.
- Page 11 and 12:
I. INTRODUCTIONThis report summariz
- Page 13:
art in fabricating and maintaining
- Page 16 and 17:
MONTEROSSO GRANA /17VALGRANA / CARA
- Page 18 and 19:
-8-Numerous references have been re
- Page 20 and 21:
.10.TABLE 2. Mechanical Properties
- Page 22 and 23:
TABLE 2 Mechanical Properties of Al
- Page 24 and 25:
TABLE 3 Mechanical Property Limits
- Page 26 and 27:
-16-l?igures5, 6, 7 ati 8 present f
- Page 28 and 29:
-18-ti-’”’-”-””””-L
- Page 30 and 31:
-20-60 .r---.— ..,.— -——,L-
- Page 32 and 33:
.22-each stress level, rate of load
- Page 34 and 35:
-24-!Z456-H321 = 0.485083-H321 = 0.
- Page 36 and 37:
-26-(c)Members with partial or cont
- Page 38 and 39:
-28-AllOyS 5083 and 54.56(~ content
- Page 40 and 41:
-30-The previous paragraphs have de
- Page 42 and 43:
-32-The problem of cargo hold abras
- Page 44 and 45:
-34-The question of residual stress
- Page 46 and 47:
.36-Each alloy was given a relative
- Page 48 and 49:
-38-GENERAL OBSERVATIONSFYior to a
- Page 50 and 51:
-40-The question of comparative imp
- Page 52 and 53:
-42-(d)(e)Poor quality welds due to
- Page 54 and 55:
-44-The ABS criteria noted above we
- Page 56 and 57:
-46-DNV would consider fatigue in e
- Page 58 and 59:
-48-is less, for the exposed side s
- Page 60 and 61:
Equation (2):-50-Hu1l SMa~um = Hull
- Page 62 and 63:
-52-Another aspect of vibrations wh
- Page 64 and 65:
-54-000000000Bottom Shell PlateSide
- Page 66 and 67:
-56-at the deck and keel. This stre
- Page 68 and 69:
-58-AT is the change inUT= Thermal
- Page 70 and 71: -60-SUl@!ARYAll parties contacted f
- Page 72 and 73: -62-(c)(d)(e)(f)T~e exterior side o
- Page 74 and 75: TABLE 12 Aluminum Bulk Carrier - Su
- Page 76 and 77: .66-INSUT.ATION AND SHEATHINGShell8
- Page 78 and 79: -68-(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)At l
- Page 80 and 81: -70-IIF.INSTALLATION OF SYSTEMS AND
- Page 82 and 83: Rudder Assembly -carrier should be
- Page 84 and 85: -74-(b)MechanicalTensile Strength 6
- Page 86 and 87: -76-(e)The steel piping must be of
- Page 88 and 89: -78-Other Piping Systems and Valves
- Page 90 and 91: -80-struetion for the aluminum hull
- Page 92 and 93: -82-Large heavy type machine~ must
- Page 94 and 95: suffers attack in an alkaline envir
- Page 96 and 97: -86-REPAIRSObtaining proper repairs
- Page 98 and 99: -88-The design of the midship s~cti
- Page 100 and 101: -90-assuming the increase is applic
- Page 102 and 103: LIGHT SHIP WEIGHT ESTIMATE-92-In or
- Page 104 and 105: -94-TABLE 20 Aluminum Bulk Carrier
- Page 106 and 107: TABLE 22 Trim and StabilityFull Loa
- Page 108 and 109: -98-TABLE 24 Price of Steel Bulk Ca
- Page 110 and 111: GaseNumber. . . -.,- .TABLE 27 Comp
- Page 112 and 113: -1o2-TABLE 28CarriersComparison of
- Page 114 and 115: 12 ---n..T.[T7%l,=LEGS IU ORF=ErY
- Page 116 and 117: -106-such as iron ore, on two of th
- Page 118 and 119: -108-7)is,zg~ gg~5e mzz~E’4E!~K2j
- Page 122 and 123: -112-fatigue, particularly in the p
- Page 124 and 125: -114-2k* Installation of Systems an
- Page 126 and 127: -116-LIST OF REFERENCES(7)Fatigue P
- Page 128 and 129: -11.8-LLST OF REFERENCES(Cent’d)(
- Page 130 and 131: -120-ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMAT
- Page 132 and 133: -122-redistribution of the still wa
- Page 134 and 135: -124-APPENDIX BEXCERPTS FROMRULES A
- Page 136 and 137: -126-92.07-10(d)(~) Interior stairs
- Page 138 and 139: -128-~gE1+0102030- .. ..—405060
- Page 140 and 141: ectintyclassification4KEYWORDSROLEL
- Page 142: SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE PUBLICATIO