design considerations for aluminum hull structures - Ship Structure ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

-116-LIST OF REFERENCES(7)Fatigue Properties of ~083, ~086 andand Plate, by H. MYndlin and C.E. Jaske.Cktober 1968.Reynolds Metals Co.,(8)(9)(lo)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)Axial-Stress Fatigue Strengths of As-Welded Aluminum Alloy ButtJoints, by I.D. Eaton. Alcoa Research Laboratories, EngineeringDesign Division Report 12-62-11, Nkrch 1962.Axial-Stress Fatigue Test Results for Transverse Butt Welds inAluminum-MagnesiumAlloys, by G.E. Nordmark. Alcoa ResearchLaboratories, Engineering Design Division Report 12-60-17,MY 1960.Fatigue Properties of S083 and S086 Sheet-and Plate ProductsbyF.W. Debwy. Kaiser Aluminum Interim Froject Report No.MS PRs8-b8, June 19s8.Axial-Stress Fatigue Properties of Aluminum Alloy Plate ButtWelds, by N.L. Person. Kaiser Aluminum Project Report No.M13PR 67-110, November 1967.Axial-Stress Fatigue Prope~ties of Plain and Welded sb.~b,~086,S083 ands4s6 Plate at Room Temperature and -320 degrees F, byJ.Cl.Kaufman and F.G. Nelson. Alcoa Research LaboratoriesReport No. 9-60-24, June 1960.Swary of Notch Toughness and Fatigue Data for A1-Mg Alloysby B.D. l!kLaughlan. Alcan Research and Development LimitedReport IL%78-69-1~-4,April 1969.The Corrosion Fatigue Behavior of A1-Mg Alloys, by C. Panseri,L. Mori and P. Dettin. British Corrosion Journal, July 1966.Altinum in Shipbuilding, by A. Brinck. A/S Nordic Alu.minwIndustry, @~O, Norway, Translated July 19~7Rotating-Beam Fatigue Properties of g183 I!UGButt Welds in 5’083-oand S086-HI12 Plate, by N.L. Person. Kaiser Aluminum InterimProject Report No. LE PR 64-86, November 196~.Swary of Cryogenic Data on Aluminum Alloys ~083 and ~086.Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.j June 1960.Residual Welding Stresses in Aluminum Alloys, by H.N. Hill.Alcoa Research Laboratories, Engineering Design Division Report12-60-43, 1960.Shipbuilding Guide to Aluminum Construction, by C.H. Holtyn.Reynolds Metals Co., October 1963.Alcoa News Release, February 1969.High Toughness Al-% Alloys for Mkrine Application, by J.G.Kaufman. Alcoa Research Laboratories Report No. 9-69-4,March 1969.
-117-LIST OF REFERENCES(Cent’d)(22)Welding Alcoa Aluminum, Aluminum Co.. of America.(23)Corrosion-Fatigue,by P.T. Gilbert.Metallurgical Reviews, 1?S6.(24)Fabrication, Welding and Inspection of Ship Hulls.the Navy, NAVSHIFS 0900-000-1000, @tober 1968.Department of(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)Radiographic Standards for Pro&ction and Repair welds.Department of the Navy, NAVSHIPS 0?00-003-9000, March 1967.The Effect of lieldllefectswith Special Reference to BWRAResearch, by F.M. Burdekin, J.D. Harrison and J-G. YOW.Conference on the Significance of Defects in Welds, Instituteof Welding, London, Februa~ 1967.A Proposed Acceptance Standard for Welded Defects Based UponSuitability for Service by J.D. Harrison, F.M. Burd~kin andJ.G. young. Conference on the Significance of Defects inWelds, Institute of Welding, London, May 1968.Influence of Weld Defects on Performance, by D.V. Lindh andG.M. Peshak. Welding Journal, l?ebrua~ 1969.Fatigue Strength of Butt Welds in Structural Steels, by L.A.Harris, G.E. Nordmark and N.M. Newmark. Welding ResearchCouncil Research Reports, Februaw l?~~.Fatigue Strength of Welds in Low-Alloy Structural Steels, byJ.E. StXLlmeyer, etc. Welding Research Council ResearchReports, June 19S6.(31)Fatigue of Welded Steel Structures, by W.H. Munse.Research Council, 1964.Welding(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)Control of Steel Construction to Avoid Brittle Failure, Editedby M.E. Shark. Welding Research Council, 1%7.The Fatigue of Metals and Structures, by H. Grover, S.A. Gordonand L.R. Jackson. Department of the Navyj NAVW?J?500-2~-~34,19S4 (Revised 1960).Cumulative Fatigue Damage, by H..T.Corten and T.J. Dolan.International Cotierence on Fatigue of Metals, September 19s6(2277-S).Fatigue of Metals Under Combinations of Stresses, by W.N.Findley. ASME Transactions, August 19~7.EffecLs of Complex Stress-Time Cycles on the Fatigue Propertiesof Metals, by W.L. Starkey and S.M. Marco. ASME Transactions,August 1%7.Fracture Behavior of Aluminum Alloys, by R.E. Zinkham andJ.H. lled~ick. Chapter 6, Fracture. Academic Press, 1969.
Page 5:
CONTENTSI.. II.III.Iv.v.VI ●VII.I
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF FIGURES(Cent’d)FIGURE NO.
Page 11 and 12:
I. INTRODUCTIONThis report summariz
Page 13:
art in fabricating and maintaining
Page 16 and 17:
MONTEROSSO GRANA /17VALGRANA / CARA
Page 18 and 19:
-8-Numerous references have been re
Page 20 and 21:
.10.TABLE 2. Mechanical Properties
Page 22 and 23:
TABLE 2 Mechanical Properties of Al
Page 24 and 25:
TABLE 3 Mechanical Property Limits
Page 26 and 27:
-16-l?igures5, 6, 7 ati 8 present f
Page 28 and 29:
-18-ti-’”’-”-””””-L
Page 30 and 31:
-20-60 .r---.— ..,.— -——,L-
Page 32 and 33:
.22-each stress level, rate of load
Page 34 and 35:
-24-!Z456-H321 = 0.485083-H321 = 0.
Page 36 and 37:
-26-(c)Members with partial or cont
Page 38 and 39:
-28-AllOyS 5083 and 54.56(~ content
Page 40 and 41:
-30-The previous paragraphs have de
Page 42 and 43:
-32-The problem of cargo hold abras
Page 44 and 45:
-34-The question of residual stress
Page 46 and 47:
.36-Each alloy was given a relative
Page 48 and 49:
-38-GENERAL OBSERVATIONSFYior to a
Page 50 and 51:
-40-The question of comparative imp
Page 52 and 53:
-42-(d)(e)Poor quality welds due to
Page 54 and 55:
-44-The ABS criteria noted above we
Page 56 and 57:
-46-DNV would consider fatigue in e
Page 58 and 59:
-48-is less, for the exposed side s
Page 60 and 61:
Equation (2):-50-Hu1l SMa~um = Hull
Page 62 and 63:
-52-Another aspect of vibrations wh
Page 64 and 65:
-54-000000000Bottom Shell PlateSide
Page 66 and 67:
-56-at the deck and keel. This stre
Page 68 and 69:
-58-AT is the change inUT= Thermal
Page 70 and 71:
-60-SUl@!ARYAll parties contacted f
Page 72 and 73:
-62-(c)(d)(e)(f)T~e exterior side o
Page 74 and 75:
TABLE 12 Aluminum Bulk Carrier - Su
Page 76 and 77: .66-INSUT.ATION AND SHEATHINGShell8
Page 78 and 79: -68-(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)At l
Page 80 and 81: -70-IIF.INSTALLATION OF SYSTEMS AND
Page 82 and 83: Rudder Assembly -carrier should be
Page 84 and 85: -74-(b)MechanicalTensile Strength 6
Page 86 and 87: -76-(e)The steel piping must be of
Page 88 and 89: -78-Other Piping Systems and Valves
Page 90 and 91: -80-struetion for the aluminum hull
Page 92 and 93: -82-Large heavy type machine~ must
Page 94 and 95: suffers attack in an alkaline envir
Page 96 and 97: -86-REPAIRSObtaining proper repairs
Page 98 and 99: -88-The design of the midship s~cti
Page 100 and 101: -90-assuming the increase is applic
Page 102 and 103: LIGHT SHIP WEIGHT ESTIMATE-92-In or
Page 104 and 105: -94-TABLE 20 Aluminum Bulk Carrier
Page 106 and 107: TABLE 22 Trim and StabilityFull Loa
Page 108 and 109: -98-TABLE 24 Price of Steel Bulk Ca
Page 110 and 111: GaseNumber. . . -.,- .TABLE 27 Comp
Page 112 and 113: -1o2-TABLE 28CarriersComparison of
Page 114 and 115: 12 ---n..T.[T7%l,=LEGS IU ORF=ErY
Page 116 and 117: -106-such as iron ore, on two of th
Page 118 and 119: -108-7)is,zg~ gg~5e mzz~E’4E!~K2j
Page 120 and 121: -11o-(a)(b)(c)(d)Inerting system fo
Page 122 and 123: -112-fatigue, particularly in the p
Page 124 and 125: -114-2k* Installation of Systems an
Page 128 and 129: -11.8-LLST OF REFERENCES(Cent’d)(
Page 130 and 131: -120-ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMAT
Page 132 and 133: -122-redistribution of the still wa
Page 134 and 135: -124-APPENDIX BEXCERPTS FROMRULES A
Page 136 and 137: -126-92.07-10(d)(~) Interior stairs
Page 138 and 139: -128-~gE1+0102030- .. ..—405060
Page 140 and 141: ectintyclassification4KEYWORDSROLEL
Page 142: SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE PUBLICATIO
show all

design considerations for aluminum hull structures - Ship Structure ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?