-34-The question of residual stresses due to welding and fabricationpresents a major problem area, in that they are difficult to predict andcontrol. In the <strong>design</strong> of steel ship <strong>structures</strong> the presently-accepted<strong>design</strong> loads and safety factors have provided a sufficient margin to account<strong>for</strong> most unknown factors in <strong>design</strong>, construction and life-cycle operation,including residual stresses resulting from welding. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, there isno precedent to indicate that the relationship between residual and materialyield stress will be comparable <strong>for</strong> steel and.<strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>structures</strong>. In fact,the past experience with large alrminum weldments tends to indicate that theeffects of residual stresses may be more severe with <strong>aluminum</strong> than withsteel, because of the cracking that has been observed in way of improperly<strong>design</strong>ed welded connections.Proper cleating of <strong>aluminum</strong> in way of welds is very important, toprevent porosity or contamination of the weld. The area must be cleanedjust prior to welding, preferably by wire brushing or equal, to preventre<strong>for</strong>mation of the <strong>aluminum</strong> oxide film.Most manufacturers of <strong>aluminum</strong> boats and,<strong>structures</strong> find it desirableto accomplish welding in a protected environment, since moisture is detrimentalto proper welding of <strong>aluminum</strong> and wind tends to disturb the shield ofgas around the arc. Further investigation must be undertaken to determinethe extent of environmental protection required <strong>for</strong> a large <strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong>,since data is presently too limited to draw firm conclusions. These factorscan not be overemphasized since nearly all cases of structural cracking of<strong>aluminum</strong> which have been observed have been the result of improper <strong>design</strong> orfabrication rather than an inherent weakness in the material. Consequently,it will be necessa~ to achieve a high level of quality control in <strong>design</strong>ingand building a large <strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong>.Aluminum alloys of the S000 series possess good workability characterstics, and can be easily <strong>for</strong>med, punched, cut, flanged, ground, andothemise processed. In general, the ease with which alloys may be cold<strong>for</strong>med decreases with higher magnesium content. h cold bending <strong>aluminum</strong>,it is very important to maintain minimum bend radii in accordance withmanufactuxerls recommendations, to prevent cracking of the cold-worked area.In summa~, the weldability and workability of S000 series <strong>aluminum</strong>alloys are considered satisfactory <strong>for</strong> large <strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong>s subject to thefollowing limitations:(a)(b)(c)Additional investigation will be required to develop properwelding procedures to minimize residual stresses.Structural details must be very carefully <strong>design</strong>ed and fabricated,as discussed previously, to eliminate hard spots, sbress concentrationsand other deleterious factors.The necessary environment <strong>for</strong> ProPer Production of a large<strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong> must be established. Pending proof to thecontrary, it must be ass~ed mat khe enviro~ent in which an<strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong> is fabricated must be more carefully controlledthan with steel const?mction. However, the extent tO which itmust be controlled, including temperature and humidity limits,are not known at this time.
-35-(d)Quality assurance procedures, particularly <strong>for</strong> checking welds,must be developed. It will be necessa~ to determine the levelof weld porosity which can be accepted as degrading the strengthof the weldment to a lesser degree than would a repair.Alloy Material CostThe final factor which must be considered in selecting an alloy is theraw material cost. A survey of <strong>aluminum</strong> manufacturers indicates that thebase price of all common ~000 series plate or sheet alloys in largequantities will vary from about $o.~0 to $0.~~ per pound, depending uponwidth, length, thickness and manufacturer. However, all manufacturersquestioned indicated that their individual base prices <strong>for</strong> ~000 seriesplates are identical.The base price of all S000 series extrusions except SLS6-HIII willvary from about $0.62 to $0.66 per pound, with SlLS6-Hill costing about@.04 per pound or about 6 per cent more. Since extrusions generallyrepresent less than Is per cent of the weight of an <strong>aluminum</strong> <strong>hull</strong>, this6 per cent differential-<strong>for</strong> S4S6-HIII allo~ has a negligible effect on theselection of alloys.In conclusion, alloy material costs do not have a measurable effect onselection of alloys <strong>for</strong> the construction of a large bulk carrier. It isnoted that specific instances will arise in which a fabricator can obtainlow-priced plates or shapes of a particular alloy from a specific manufacturerswarehouse, ba~ed upon ~tilizing currekt invento”~ rather thanplacing a special order. This showld not be a factor in this study,however, since the quantities, thicknesses, widths and lengths required<strong>for</strong> constructing a bulk carrier womd warrant a direct shipment from themill to the fabricator.Selection of AlloysThe selection of an alloy or series of alloys <strong>for</strong> use in <strong>design</strong>ing an<strong>aluminum</strong> bulk carrier, or, <strong>for</strong> that matter, aqy <strong>aluminum</strong> hill, is a verydifficult process, particularly if the availability and basic cost per poundof the alloys is identical. This is due primarily to the fact that eachalloy’s advantages in a particular area are usually balanced by disadvantagesOr some type. For example, the alloys with high magnesium content such as5083 amlS4S6 have high strength and would thus produce a lighter <strong>hull</strong> withlower material procurement cost and life cycle operating cost. However,-these alloys-present more problems.in.weldi~, cold working and corrosionthan do the..low-rnagnesi@alloys such”as 5052 and 5086. -Achieving a properbalance between these factors is difficfit, since it depends upon theindividual <strong>design</strong>ers assessment of their relative importance.In the process of selecti~ an alloy or series of alloys <strong>for</strong> the <strong>design</strong>of a bulk carrier <strong>hull</strong>, an ass~ed relative importance has been established<strong>for</strong> each of the factors considered in evaluating the alloys: staticstrength, including buckling, fatigue strength, corrosion and abrasionresistance, toughness, weldability and workability. Alloy costs were notincluded because of their similarity, and weight was not included directlysince this factor is directly related to material strength, and is thusimplicitly incorporated in the evaluation.
- Page 5: CONTENTSI.. II.III.Iv.v.VI ●VII.I
- Page 9 and 10: LIST OF FIGURES(Cent’d)FIGURE NO.
- Page 11 and 12: I. INTRODUCTIONThis report summariz
- Page 13: art in fabricating and maintaining
- Page 16 and 17: MONTEROSSO GRANA /17VALGRANA / CARA
- Page 18 and 19: -8-Numerous references have been re
- Page 20 and 21: .10.TABLE 2. Mechanical Properties
- Page 22 and 23: TABLE 2 Mechanical Properties of Al
- Page 24 and 25: TABLE 3 Mechanical Property Limits
- Page 26 and 27: -16-l?igures5, 6, 7 ati 8 present f
- Page 28 and 29: -18-ti-’”’-”-””””-L
- Page 30 and 31: -20-60 .r---.— ..,.— -——,L-
- Page 32 and 33: .22-each stress level, rate of load
- Page 34 and 35: -24-!Z456-H321 = 0.485083-H321 = 0.
- Page 36 and 37: -26-(c)Members with partial or cont
- Page 38 and 39: -28-AllOyS 5083 and 54.56(~ content
- Page 40 and 41: -30-The previous paragraphs have de
- Page 42 and 43: -32-The problem of cargo hold abras
- Page 46 and 47: .36-Each alloy was given a relative
- Page 48 and 49: -38-GENERAL OBSERVATIONSFYior to a
- Page 50 and 51: -40-The question of comparative imp
- Page 52 and 53: -42-(d)(e)Poor quality welds due to
- Page 54 and 55: -44-The ABS criteria noted above we
- Page 56 and 57: -46-DNV would consider fatigue in e
- Page 58 and 59: -48-is less, for the exposed side s
- Page 60 and 61: Equation (2):-50-Hu1l SMa~um = Hull
- Page 62 and 63: -52-Another aspect of vibrations wh
- Page 64 and 65: -54-000000000Bottom Shell PlateSide
- Page 66 and 67: -56-at the deck and keel. This stre
- Page 68 and 69: -58-AT is the change inUT= Thermal
- Page 70 and 71: -60-SUl@!ARYAll parties contacted f
- Page 72 and 73: -62-(c)(d)(e)(f)T~e exterior side o
- Page 74 and 75: TABLE 12 Aluminum Bulk Carrier - Su
- Page 76 and 77: .66-INSUT.ATION AND SHEATHINGShell8
- Page 78 and 79: -68-(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)At l
- Page 80 and 81: -70-IIF.INSTALLATION OF SYSTEMS AND
- Page 82 and 83: Rudder Assembly -carrier should be
- Page 84 and 85: -74-(b)MechanicalTensile Strength 6
- Page 86 and 87: -76-(e)The steel piping must be of
- Page 88 and 89: -78-Other Piping Systems and Valves
- Page 90 and 91: -80-struetion for the aluminum hull
- Page 92 and 93: -82-Large heavy type machine~ must
- Page 94 and 95:
suffers attack in an alkaline envir
- Page 96 and 97:
-86-REPAIRSObtaining proper repairs
- Page 98 and 99:
-88-The design of the midship s~cti
- Page 100 and 101:
-90-assuming the increase is applic
- Page 102 and 103:
LIGHT SHIP WEIGHT ESTIMATE-92-In or
- Page 104 and 105:
-94-TABLE 20 Aluminum Bulk Carrier
- Page 106 and 107:
TABLE 22 Trim and StabilityFull Loa
- Page 108 and 109:
-98-TABLE 24 Price of Steel Bulk Ca
- Page 110 and 111:
GaseNumber. . . -.,- .TABLE 27 Comp
- Page 112 and 113:
-1o2-TABLE 28CarriersComparison of
- Page 114 and 115:
12 ---n..T.[T7%l,=LEGS IU ORF=ErY
- Page 116 and 117:
-106-such as iron ore, on two of th
- Page 118 and 119:
-108-7)is,zg~ gg~5e mzz~E’4E!~K2j
- Page 120 and 121:
-11o-(a)(b)(c)(d)Inerting system fo
- Page 122 and 123:
-112-fatigue, particularly in the p
- Page 124 and 125:
-114-2k* Installation of Systems an
- Page 126 and 127:
-116-LIST OF REFERENCES(7)Fatigue P
- Page 128 and 129:
-11.8-LLST OF REFERENCES(Cent’d)(
- Page 130 and 131:
-120-ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMAT
- Page 132 and 133:
-122-redistribution of the still wa
- Page 134 and 135:
-124-APPENDIX BEXCERPTS FROMRULES A
- Page 136 and 137:
-126-92.07-10(d)(~) Interior stairs
- Page 138 and 139:
-128-~gE1+0102030- .. ..—405060
- Page 140 and 141:
ectintyclassification4KEYWORDSROLEL
- Page 142:
SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE PUBLICATIO