13.07.2015 Views

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 4.0<strong>Risk</strong> Characterizationcoal refuse unlined l<strong>and</strong>fills showed an excess cancer risk of 1 in 50,000: allnoncarcinogenic constituents were well below an HQ of 1.• Arsenic <strong>and</strong> cobalt were the constituents with the highest risks for surfaceimpoundments, with risks as high as 1 in 50 <strong>and</strong> an HQ of 500, respectively, for unlinedunits. Clay-lined surface impoundments presented 90th percentile cancer risks above 1 in100,000 for arsenic (7 in 1,000 cancer risk), HQs above 1 for boron (HQs as high as 4),cadmium (HQ as high as 3), cobalt (HQ as high as 200), molybdenum (HQ as high as 5),<strong>and</strong> nitrate (an MCL-based HQ as high as 10). When surface impoundments are unlined,they also show risk above an HQ of 1 for lead (HQ of 9) <strong>and</strong> selenium (HQ of 2). Here,arsenic cancer risks are as high as 1 in 50, <strong>and</strong> cobalt had HQs as high as 500. The only50th percentile surface impoundment results that exceeded the risk range or HQ criterionwere arsenic<strong>and</strong> cobalt. Here, unlined units had arsenic cancer risks as high as 6 in10,000 while clay-lined units had arsenic cancer risks as high as 1 in 5,000. Cobalt HQswere as high as 20 <strong>and</strong> 6 for unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined surface impoundments, respectively.• For the groundwater-to-drinking-water pathway, composite liners, as modeled in thisassessment, effectively reduce risks from all constituents to below a cancer risk of 1 in100,000 <strong>and</strong> an HQ of 1 for both l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> surface impoundments at the 90th <strong>and</strong> 50thpercentiles.• For the groundwater-to-drinking-water pathway, arrival times of the peak concentrationsat a receptor well are much longer for l<strong>and</strong>fills (hundreds or thous<strong>and</strong>s of years) than forsurface impoundments (most less than 100 years).• For humans exposed via the groundwater-to-surface-water (fish consumption) pathway,unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined surface impoundments posed risks above an excess cancer risk of1 in 100,000 <strong>and</strong> an HQ of 1 at the 90th percentile. For CCW managed alone in surfaceimpoundments, these exceedences came from selenium (HQs of 3 <strong>and</strong> 2), while for CCWcomanaged with coal refuse these exceedences came from arsenic (3 in 100,000 <strong>and</strong> 2 in100,000 excess cancer risks for unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined units). All 50th percentile surfaceimpoundment risks are below a cancer risk of 1 in 100,000 <strong>and</strong> an HQ of 1. Noconstituents pose risks above these risk levels for l<strong>and</strong>fills (including FBC l<strong>and</strong>fills) atthe 90th or 50th percentile for the fish consumption pathway.• Waste type has a much larger effect when wastes are managed in surface impoundmentsthan when they are managed in l<strong>and</strong>fills. In the case of surface impoundments, someconstituents (boron, molybdenum, nitrate, <strong>and</strong> selenium) presented higher risks fromCCW managed alone. However, others (arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, <strong>and</strong> lead) presentedhigher risks when CCW is comanaged with coal refuse, because of their association withthe sulfide minerals concentrated in the refuse.• The higher risks for surface impoundments than l<strong>and</strong>fills are likely due to higher wasteleachate concentrations <strong>and</strong> the higher hydraulic head from the impounded liquid waste.This is consistent with damage cases reporting wet h<strong>and</strong>ling as a factor that can increaserisks from CCW management.April 2010–Draft EPA document. 4-58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!