13.07.2015 Views

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive Summary<strong>Human</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> of Coal Combustion WastesIII from CCW codisposed with coal refuseexceeded an excess cancer risk of 10 -5 , withcancer risks of 1 in 50,000.As shown in Table ES-3, arsenic <strong>and</strong>cobalt were the constituents with the highestrisks for surface impoundments. Clay-linedsurface impoundments presented 90thpercentile excess cancer risks above 1 in10,000 for arsenic <strong>and</strong> exceed the HQcriterion of 1 for boron, cadmium, cobalt,molybdenum, <strong>and</strong> nitrate. Here, arsenic excesscancer risks were as high as 1 in 500, <strong>and</strong>cobalt had HQs as high as 200. When surfaceimpoundments were unlined, they alsoshowed risk above the HQ criterion for lead<strong>and</strong> selenium. Here, arsenic excess cancerrisks were as high as 1 in 50, <strong>and</strong> cobalt hadHQs as high as 500. As seen in Table ES-4,the 50th percentile surface impoundmentresults exceeded a 1 in 100,000 cancer risk forarsenic <strong>and</strong> only cobalt exceeded an HQ of 1.Here, unlined units had arsenic excess cancerrisks as high as 6 in 10,000 while clay-linedunits had arsenic excess cancer risks as highas 1 in 5,000. Cobalt HQs were as high as 20<strong>and</strong> 6 for unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined surfaceimpoundments, respectively.For the groundwater-to-drinking-waterpathway, composite liners, as modeled in thisassessment, effectively reduced risks from allconstituents to below a 10 -5 cancer risk or HQof 1 for both l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> surfaceimpoundments at the 90th <strong>and</strong> 50thpercentiles.For the groundwater-to-drinking-waterpathway, arrival times of the peakconcentrations at a receptor well are muchlonger for l<strong>and</strong>fills (hundreds or thous<strong>and</strong>s ofyears) than for surface impoundments (mostless than 100 years).For humans exposed via the groundwaterto-surface-water(fish consumption) pathway,unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined surface impoundmentsposed risks above the HQ criterion <strong>and</strong> anexcess cancer risk of 1 in 100,000 at the 90thpercentile (see Table ES-5). For CCWmanaged alone in surface impoundments,these exceedences came from selenium (HQsof 3 <strong>and</strong> 2 for unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined units,respectively), while for CCW comanaged withcoal refuse, these exceedences came fromarsenic (3 in 100,000 <strong>and</strong> 2 in 100,000 excesscancer risks for unlined <strong>and</strong> clay-lined units,respectively). All 50th percentile surfaceimpoundment risks are below an HQ of 1 <strong>and</strong>an excess cancer risk of 1 in 100,000. Noconstituents pose risks above these levels forl<strong>and</strong>fills (including FBC l<strong>and</strong>fills) at the 90thor 50th percentile.Waste type has a much larger effect whenmanaged in surface impoundments than whenmanaged in l<strong>and</strong>fills. In the case of surfaceimpoundments, some constituents presentedhigher risks from CCW managed alone(boron, molybdenum, nitrate, <strong>and</strong> selenium).However, others presented higher risks whenCCW is comanaged with coal refuse (arsenic,cadmium, cobalt, <strong>and</strong> lead).The higher risks for surface impoundmentsthan l<strong>and</strong>fills are likely due to higher wasteleachate concentrations <strong>and</strong> the higherhydraulic head from the impounded liquidwaste. This is consistent with damage casesreporting wet h<strong>and</strong>ling as a factor that canincrease risks from CCW management.April 2010–Draft EPA document.ES-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!