13.07.2015 Views

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 1.0Introduction1.4 Document OrganizationThis document is organized into the following sections:• Section 2, Problem Formulation, describes how the framework for the full-scaleanalysis was developed, including identification of the waste constituents, exposurepathways, <strong>and</strong> receptors of concern; selection <strong>and</strong> characterization of waste managementpractices <strong>and</strong> sites to model; <strong>and</strong> development of the conceptual site models for themodeling effort.• Section 3, Analysis, describes the probabilistic modeling framework <strong>and</strong> the models <strong>and</strong>methods used to (1) screen CCW constituents for the full-scale analysis, (2) estimateconstituent releases from CCW l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> surface impoundments (source models),(3) model constituent concentrations in the environmental media of concern (groundwater<strong>and</strong> surface water), (4) calculate exposure, <strong>and</strong> (5) estimate risk to human <strong>and</strong> ecologicalreceptors.• Section 4, <strong>Risk</strong> Characterization, characterizes the human health <strong>and</strong> environmentalrisks posed by CCW, including (1) discussion of the methods used to account forvariability <strong>and</strong> uncertainty <strong>and</strong> (2) identification of the scenarios <strong>and</strong> conditions modeledthat resulted in higher <strong>and</strong> lower risks. Results are presented as national estimates forCCW l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> CCW surface impoundments, as well as by waste type <strong>and</strong> linerstatus. This section characterizes the risks posed by CCW constituents <strong>and</strong> pathwaysunder the conditions modeled, including factors (such as liners or facility environmentalsetting) that result in higher or lower risk levels. Finally, the risk characterizationevaluates the risk results in light of more recent research on CCW waste managementpractices <strong>and</strong> the environmental behavior of CCW constituents.The first three appendices provide detailed information on how wastes, WMUs, <strong>and</strong>settings were characterized for the risk assessment. Appendix A describes the chemicalcharacteristics of CCW, including the CCW leachate concentration distributions used torepresent disposal conditions in l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> surface impoundments. Appendix B describes howEPA characterized the CCW l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> surface impoundments, including locations, surfacearea, capacities, geometry, <strong>and</strong> liner status. Appendix C presents the methodologies <strong>and</strong> dataused to characterize the environmental setting at each CCW site identified in Appendix B,including delineating the site layout <strong>and</strong> determining the environmental setting (e.g.,meteorology, climate, soils, aquifers, <strong>and</strong> waterbodies).The next five appendices provide detailed information on the specific models <strong>and</strong> dataused to calculate risk, including the nonlinear sorption isotherms (Appendix D), the surfacewater fate <strong>and</strong> transport <strong>and</strong> intake equations (Appendix E), the exposure factors (Appendix F),benchmarks for human health (Appendix G), <strong>and</strong> benchmarks for ecological risk (Appendix H).The next three appendices provide background <strong>and</strong> results for the screening analysis,including calculation of health-based numbers (HBNs, Appendix I), chemical-specific inputsused in the screening analysis (Appendix J), <strong>and</strong> the screening analysis results (Appendix K).Finally, Appendix L provides figures showing, for selected CCW constituents,cumulative percentiles of the time it took for the peak concentration to reach a receptor well foreach source type.April 2010–Draft EPA document. 1-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!