13.07.2015 Views

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive Summary<strong>Human</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> of Coal Combustion WastesTable ES-4. Selected a 50th Percentile <strong>Risk</strong> Results by CCW Type: SurfaceImpoundments, Groundwater-to-Drinking-Water PathwayChemical50th Percentile HQ or Cancer <strong>Risk</strong> Value bUnlined UnitsConventional CCW – 44 surface impoundmentsCancerClay-Lined UnitsComposite–LinedUnitsArsenic III 1E-04 6E-05 0Arsenic V 2E-05 4E-06 0Codisposed CCW <strong>and</strong> Coal Refuse – 72 surface impoundmentsCancerArsenic III 6E-04 2E-04 0Arsenic V 3E-04 4E-05 0NoncancerCobalt 20 6 0abValues are presented only for chemicals that exceed an excess cancer risk of 1 in 100,000(arsenic only) or an HQ of 1.Values are HQs for all chemicals except arsenic; arsenic values are cancer risk.Zero results indicate that contaminant infiltration rates were too small for thecontaminant plume to reach the receptor during the 10,000-year period of the analysis.Table ES-5. Selected a 90th Percentile <strong>Risk</strong> Results by CCW Type: SurfaceImpoundments, Groundwater-to-Surface-Water PathwayChemical90th Percentile HQ or Cancer <strong>Risk</strong> Value bUnlined UnitsConventional CCW – 44 surface impoundmentsNoncancerClay-Lined UnitsComposite-LinedUnitsSelenium VI 3 2 2E-06Codisposed CCW <strong>and</strong> Coal Refuse – 72 surface impoundmentsCancerArsenic III 3E-05 2E-05 1E-14Arsenic V 2E-05 8E-06 6E-19abValues are presented only for chemicals that exceed an excess cancer risk of 1 in 100,000(arsenic only) or an HQ of 1.Values are HQs for all chemicals except arsenic; arsenic values are cancer risk.Zero results indicate that contaminant infiltration rates were too small for thecontaminant plume to reach the receptor during the 10,000-year period of the analysis.April 2010–Draft EPA document.ES-8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!