13.07.2015 Views

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment - Earthjustice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 3.0Analysis• The analysis considered exposures for three child receptor cohorts <strong>and</strong> one adult receptorcohort; exposure for these cohorts was assumed to start at ages 3, 8, 15, <strong>and</strong> 20,respectively• Chemical properties (bio-uptake <strong>and</strong> bioaccumulation factors) were collected from bestavailable literature values (see Appendix J)• <strong>Human</strong> exposure factors (e.g., body weight, exposure duration, exposure frequency,consumption rates) were set at central tendency values.Appendix I describes the methodology used to develop the CCW HBNs <strong>and</strong> provides theHBNs used in the screening analysis.3.2.3.2 CSCL CalculationsThe CCW ecological screening analysis paralleled the human health screening analysis<strong>and</strong> addressed two routes of exposure for ecological receptors: direct contact with contaminatedmedia <strong>and</strong> ingestion of contaminated food items. <strong>Ecological</strong> exposure scenarios occurring nearCCW l<strong>and</strong>fills or surface impoundments <strong>and</strong> addressing these exposure routes included thefollowing:• Direct contact with surface water contaminated by CCW leachate through thegroundwater-to-surface-water pathway• Ingestion of aquatic organisms in streams <strong>and</strong> lakes contaminated by CCW leachatethrough the groundwater-to-surface-water pathway.CSCLs for the contaminated media in each of these exposure scenarios were calculatedas described in Section 3.1.2 <strong>and</strong> Appendix H (the same CSCLs were used for both screening<strong>and</strong> the full-scale analysis). As with the HBNs, CSCLs were compared directly to concentrationsof constituents found in CCW <strong>and</strong> CCW leachate <strong>and</strong> porewater, or to protective offsite mediaconcentrations to estimate risk for screening.3.2.4 Screening ResultsThe screening analysis conducted in 2002 (U.S. EPA, 2002a) was used in this riskassessment to help narrow the list of constituents to be addressed in the full scale analysis for thegroundwater-to-drinking-water <strong>and</strong> groundwater-to-surface-water pathways. Detailed human <strong>and</strong>ecological screening results for these pathways are provided in Appendix K. The groundwaterto-drinking-water<strong>and</strong> groundwater-to-surface-water pathways (human fish consumption <strong>and</strong>ecological risks) did show risks above the screening criteria for several CCW constituents in thescreening analysis. Table 3-5 lists the 21 constituents that had 90th percentile screening analysisgroundwater pathway risks greater than a cancer risk of 1 in 100,000 or a noncancer risk with anHQ greater than 1 for human health <strong>and</strong> 10 for ecological risk. 99 An HQ of 10 was used for screening ecological risks to account for conservatism of ecological benchmarks <strong>and</strong>exposure estimates used in the screening analysis (see Section 4.4.3.4).April 2010–Draft EPA document. 3-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!