2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

Recommendations

Info

• Sessions and workshops on effective strategies for teaching science, math, and technology through Inquiry Series • Affiliated Programs (e.g., TEAMS, TeachOhio, PRISM, REAL, DREAMS) Goal #2: Recruit and retain students into STEM and STEM education disciplines. The Center addressed Goal 2 through the following initiatives/activities/ programs/events: • Future Teacher Conference • TeachOhio alternative licensure program • OJSHS Goal #3: Conduct and communicate collaborative research on how people best teach and learn science and mathematics and/or on the barriers and enablers related to current reform efforts. The Center addressed Goal 3 through the following initiatives/activities/ programs/events: • Research Community • Educational Statistics Seminar Goal #4: Develop and sustain a regional collaborative alliance including university, school, and community partners through a shared vision and collaborative spirit for tackling current STEM education issues. The Center addressed Goal 4 through the following initiatives/activities/ programs/events: • COSMOS Collaborative Council (CCC) • NWO Executive Board Goal #5: Increase the leadership capacity for mathematics and science education in northwest Ohio. The Center addressed Goal 5 through the following initiatives/activities/ programs/events: • Inquiry Series Symposium • Summit Presentations Back to top
Part II. Evaluation Goals, Questions, and Procedures Evaluation Goals and Questions The overall goal of the 2006-<strong>2007</strong> annual evaluation of the NWO Center was to determine the progress of the Center towards the attainment of its revised goals. This was accomplished by formulating evaluation/research questions specific for each goal, aligning the Center initiatives/activities/programs/events with each goal, and identifying multiple data sources that could be triangulated to enhance the validity of the findings (see Table 1 for details). Table 1. Alignment of NWO Center Goals and Initiatives/Activities with the Evaluation Questions and Data Sources Revised NWO Center Goals Goal 1: Enhance the preparation of pre-service and in-service teachers though research based professional development focusing on investigative mathematics and science teaching and learning NWO Center Activities/ Initiatives - Undergraduate and graduate course or program modification - Undergraduate professional organizations (BG-UT SECO and CTM) - Praxis II Preparation Workshop - Graduate MAT program scholarships - NWO Symposium - Inquiry Series - Affiliated Programs (TEAMS, TeachOhio, PRISM, DREAMS) Evaluation Questions Evaluation Data Sources 1). What are the beliefs and practices of NWO participants? How do these beliefs compare for TEAMS, TeachOhio and Other NWO participants? 2). What are the emic and etic perceptions regarding the effectiveness of the NWO professional development? 3). How do participants perceive that NWO activities have impacted their beliefs and practices? 4). How have the universities responded by developing/ revising courses/programs to better prepare teachers? 5). In what ways are participants deepening their content knowledge in their subject areas? 6). How do participants transfer skills and knowledge received through NWO professional development into the classroom? Used to Answer These Questions - TBI survey data - Session evaluations - Teacher Interviews - Faculty Interviews - PD Observations - # courses developed and/or modified; - Faculty interviews # of students in MAT programs; # hours successfully completed each year; names of courses completed; # SECO/CTM meetings; attendance at SECO/CTM meetings; # members in SECO/CTM; faculty interviews; attendance of Praxis II Tutoring sessions in math and science; workshop evaluation by participants - Classroom observations - Teacher interviews
Page 1 and 2:
NORTHWEST OHIO CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents 2 NWO Mission 2 N
Page 5 and 6:
NWO 2007 Annual Report ~ An Introdu
Page 7 and 8:
We are equally committed to identif
Page 9 and 10:
NWO Activities and Accomplishments
Page 11 and 12:
mathematics and a new interdiscipli
Page 13 and 14:
Research Learning Community In the
Page 15 and 16:
Research in Science and Mathematics
Page 17 and 18:
Learning Sciences PhD Program BGSU
Page 19 and 20:
NWO Faculty and Staff Scholarship N
Page 21 and 22:
evaluation reports are available up
Page 23 and 24:
In order to determine progress towa
Page 25 and 26:
In sum, we are both proud of our FY
Page 27 and 28:
The tables below show amounts spent
Page 29 and 30:
COSMOS Collaborative Council (CCC)
Page 31 and 32:
NWO Projected Goals and Activities
Page 33 and 34:
Goal 3: Conduct and communicate col
Page 35 and 36:
NWO Resource Development and Sustai
Page 37 and 38:
2007 Yr. Avg. 2006 Yr. Avg. 2005 Yr
Page 39 and 40:
Issues, Problems, and Anticipated S
Page 41 and 42:
Appendices 2 0 0 7 N W O Ce n t e r
Page 43 and 44:
Appendix A: Regional Grants to Part
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Appendix B: 2006 Northwest Ohio Sym
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix D: Larabee Mini-Grant: The
Page 65 and 66: Appendix E: Redesigned/Developed Co
Page 67 and 68: Appendix F: NWO Faculty and Staff S
Page 69 and 70: Appendix F: NWO Faculty and Staff S
Page 71 and 72: Appendix G: COSMOS Publication: Mor
Page 73 and 74: Appendix G: COSMOS Publication: Mor
Page 75 and 76: Appendix H: COSMOS Publication: Van
Page 77 and 78: Appendix I: COSMOS Publication: Van
Page 83 and 84: Appendix K: COSMOS Publicity: RIPE
Page 85 and 86: Appendix L: COSMOS Publicity: REAL
Page 87 and 88: Appendix N: 2006-07 REAL Recruiting
Page 89 and 90: Appendix P: NWO TEAMS Recruiting Br
Page 91 and 92: Appendix Q: TeachOhio Recruiting Br
Page 93 and 94: Appendix R: Executive Board Minutes
Page 95 and 96: Appendix R: Executive Board Minutes
Page 97 and 98: Appendix S: NWO Executive Board Byl
Page 99 and 100: Appendix S: NWO Executive Board Byl
Page 101 and 102: Appendix T: COSMOS Collaborative Co
Page 109 and 110: Appendix U: NWO Evaluation Report M
Page 111 and 112: Evaluation Question 5: In what ways
Page 113 and 114: References 71 Appendix 72
Page 115: Back to top Original NWO Goals The
Page 120 and 121: Table 1. Alignment of NWO Center Go
Page 122 and 123: depth information from the particip
Page 124 and 125: Observations: Horizon’s Classroom
Page 126 and 127: Observations: Horizon’s Classroom
Page 128 and 129: and capsule). Supporting qualitativ
Page 130 and 131: negative direction. However, these
Page 132 and 133: Table 7. Summary of the TBI Survey
Page 134 and 135: NWO Symposium: The overall rating f
Page 136 and 137: Detailed Results for NWO PD Session
Page 138 and 139: elieved that doing such experiments
Page 140 and 141: last year. Half of the 2007 partici
Page 142 and 143: Table 11. Average and Range of TEAM
Page 144 and 145: elements of science abstraction (1)
Page 146 and 147: teacher appeared confident in abili
Page 148 and 149: Table 13. Average TeachOhio Science
Page 150 and 151: Recommendations at the post-observa
Page 152 and 153: Recommendations included: Increase
Page 154 and 155: knowledge (1); incorporate tasks th
Page 156 and 157: Content 3.75 3 3.4 3.5 3.75 3.5 5 C
Page 158 and 159: tests attended PRAXIS II tutoring s
Page 160 and 161: Ohio Junior Science and Humanities
Page 162 and 163: Back to top Goal 3 - Evaluation Que
Page 164 and 165: I’ve been “forced” to read li
Page 166 and 167:
The concepts and ideas that were di
Page 168 and 169:
The progress of the NWO Center towa
Page 170 and 171:
students. The also loved foldables.
Page 172 and 173:
(TEAMS, TeachOhio and Other NWO): m
Page 174 and 175:
In their open-ended evaluations and
Page 176 and 177:
• more intellectual engagement of
Page 178 and 179:
Appendix A Higher Education Faculty
show all

2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?