2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Although the Center has made a substantial progress in standardizing the types and<br />
times of data collection, differences were still pronounced with regard to the TBI survey<br />
administration (some groups were surveyed twice, some three times, and the times of<br />
data collection differed). This made the analysis of change in teacher beliefs and<br />
practices less straightforward and clear. It is therefore important to define more clearly<br />
which analysis of change will be the most meaningful.<br />
Suggestions for session evaluation data collection:<br />
• The Center needs to further determine what comparisons across<br />
activities/programs/events are of importance and ensure that the session evaluations<br />
data are collected and entered with clear identification of the participant affiliation.<br />
• It is also important to define more clearly what is meant by NWO professional<br />
development activities (e.g., whether this includes only those activities/events that are<br />
attended by all participants or program-specific activities as well or both). The data<br />
collected this year did not always allow for a clear identification and separation of the<br />
responses.<br />
Suggestions for data collection instruments:<br />
• The number of questions in the teacher and faculty interview protocols as well as in the<br />
classroom and session observation protocols can be reduced to increase the efficiency of<br />
the data collection, entry and analysis.<br />
• For the same reasons as well as to increase the consistency of ratings, the nature of<br />
some questions should be changed to better fit the evaluation/research questions that<br />
are of interest to the Center.<br />
Back to top<br />
References<br />
James, N., & Busher, H, (2006). Credibility, authenticity, and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing.<br />
Qualitative Research, 6(3), 403-420.<br />
Kind, P.M., Jones, K. & Barmby, P. (<strong>2007</strong>). Developing attitudes towards science measures.<br />
International Journal of Science Education 29(7), pp. 871-893.<br />
Science Attitudes, Skills, and Knowledge Survey (SASKS). Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in<br />
the Preparation of Teachers Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant<br />
DUE-0084434 September, 2000.<br />
Back to top