2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

Recommendations

Info

• more intellectual engagement of the participants • more connections to other disciplines and real world contexts • more information in a “classroom ready” format • increase intellectual rigor • use more constructive criticism • more challenging of participants’ ideas The observers in the classrooms also noted some areas in which the NWO participants can improve by participating in the NWO Center professional development. The observed teachers appeared to need more tips and training in how to: • provide adequate time for sense-making and wrap-up • pay attention to students’ prior experience, preparedness and learning styles • use instructional strategies and activities that reflect attention to issues of access, equity and diversity • use more investigative tasks and strategies • encourage collaborative learning and draw all students into the discussion • develop greater collegiality among students • encourage participation of all students • increase participation of females • adjust instruction for students’ needs when appropriate • using higher order, open-ended questioning, • give students more time to explore misconceptions • making more real world connections and connections to other disciplines • avoid/recognize science and math inaccuracies Suggestions from high school students for improving the OJSHS: • more poster judges to avoid having them in pairs • a better judging procedure (e.g., judging only the work that the students actually did independently on the project) • more diversity in judges’ backgrounds • opportunity to tour science research labs at the university Suggestions from faculty for improving the Research Community: • more directed discussions • better, more generalizable, more current and relevant selection of examples of research on teaching and learning in sciences • better use of time in the Learning Community meetings (hoping for a research project or grant proposal to emerge from the meetings) • less focus on theoretical points of view and more on practical applications • scheduling time for individual members to share their projects, struggles and accomplishments • more structured protocol for evaluating research articles • reading and discussing classic papers/books in STEM education in order to develop an understanding of how STEM education has evolved over time. Suggestions for survey data collection:
• Although the Center has made a substantial progress in standardizing the types and times of data collection, differences were still pronounced with regard to the TBI survey administration (some groups were surveyed twice, some three times, and the times of data collection differed). This made the analysis of change in teacher beliefs and practices less straightforward and clear. It is therefore important to define more clearly which analysis of change will be the most meaningful. Suggestions for session evaluation data collection: • The Center needs to further determine what comparisons across activities/programs/events are of importance and ensure that the session evaluations data are collected and entered with clear identification of the participant affiliation. • It is also important to define more clearly what is meant by NWO professional development activities (e.g., whether this includes only those activities/events that are attended by all participants or program-specific activities as well or both). The data collected this year did not always allow for a clear identification and separation of the responses. Suggestions for data collection instruments: • The number of questions in the teacher and faculty interview protocols as well as in the classroom and session observation protocols can be reduced to increase the efficiency of the data collection, entry and analysis. • For the same reasons as well as to increase the consistency of ratings, the nature of some questions should be changed to better fit the evaluation/research questions that are of interest to the Center. Back to top References James, N., & Busher, H, (2006). Credibility, authenticity, and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 403-420. Kind, P.M., Jones, K. & Barmby, P. (<strong>2007</strong>). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education 29(7), pp. 871-893. Science Attitudes, Skills, and Knowledge Survey (SASKS). Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DUE-0084434 September, 2000. Back to top
Page 1 and 2:
NORTHWEST OHIO CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents 2 NWO Mission 2 N
Page 5 and 6:
NWO 2007 Annual Report ~ An Introdu
Page 7 and 8:
We are equally committed to identif
Page 9 and 10:
NWO Activities and Accomplishments
Page 11 and 12:
mathematics and a new interdiscipli
Page 13 and 14:
Research Learning Community In the
Page 15 and 16:
Research in Science and Mathematics
Page 17 and 18:
Learning Sciences PhD Program BGSU
Page 19 and 20:
NWO Faculty and Staff Scholarship N
Page 21 and 22:
evaluation reports are available up
Page 23 and 24:
In order to determine progress towa
Page 25 and 26:
In sum, we are both proud of our FY
Page 27 and 28:
The tables below show amounts spent
Page 29 and 30:
COSMOS Collaborative Council (CCC)
Page 31 and 32:
NWO Projected Goals and Activities
Page 33 and 34:
Goal 3: Conduct and communicate col
Page 35 and 36:
NWO Resource Development and Sustai
Page 37 and 38:
2007 Yr. Avg. 2006 Yr. Avg. 2005 Yr
Page 39 and 40:
Issues, Problems, and Anticipated S
Page 41 and 42:
Appendices 2 0 0 7 N W O Ce n t e r
Page 43 and 44:
Appendix A: Regional Grants to Part
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Appendix B: 2006 Northwest Ohio Sym
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix D: Larabee Mini-Grant: The
Page 65 and 66:
Appendix E: Redesigned/Developed Co
Page 67 and 68:
Appendix F: NWO Faculty and Staff S
Page 69 and 70:
Appendix F: NWO Faculty and Staff S
Page 71 and 72:
Appendix G: COSMOS Publication: Mor
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix G: COSMOS Publication: Mor
Page 75 and 76:
Appendix H: COSMOS Publication: Van
Page 77 and 78:
Appendix I: COSMOS Publication: Van
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix K: COSMOS Publicity: RIPE
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix L: COSMOS Publicity: REAL
Page 87 and 88:
Appendix N: 2006-07 REAL Recruiting
Page 89 and 90:
Appendix P: NWO TEAMS Recruiting Br
Page 91 and 92:
Appendix Q: TeachOhio Recruiting Br
Page 93 and 94:
Appendix R: Executive Board Minutes
Page 95 and 96:
Appendix R: Executive Board Minutes
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix S: NWO Executive Board Byl
Page 99 and 100:
Appendix S: NWO Executive Board Byl
Page 101 and 102:
Appendix T: COSMOS Collaborative Co
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix U: NWO Evaluation Report M
Page 111 and 112:
Evaluation Question 5: In what ways
Page 113 and 114:
References 71 Appendix 72
Page 115 and 116:
Back to top Original NWO Goals The
Page 117:
Part II. Evaluation Goals, Question
Page 120 and 121:
Table 1. Alignment of NWO Center Go
Page 122 and 123:
depth information from the particip
Page 124 and 125:
Observations: Horizon’s Classroom
Page 126 and 127: Observations: Horizon’s Classroom
Page 128 and 129: and capsule). Supporting qualitativ
Page 130 and 131: negative direction. However, these
Page 132 and 133: Table 7. Summary of the TBI Survey
Page 134 and 135: NWO Symposium: The overall rating f
Page 136 and 137: Detailed Results for NWO PD Session
Page 138 and 139: elieved that doing such experiments
Page 140 and 141: last year. Half of the 2007 partici
Page 142 and 143: Table 11. Average and Range of TEAM
Page 144 and 145: elements of science abstraction (1)
Page 146 and 147: teacher appeared confident in abili
Page 148 and 149: Table 13. Average TeachOhio Science
Page 150 and 151: Recommendations at the post-observa
Page 152 and 153: Recommendations included: Increase
Page 154 and 155: knowledge (1); incorporate tasks th
Page 156 and 157: Content 3.75 3 3.4 3.5 3.75 3.5 5 C
Page 158 and 159: tests attended PRAXIS II tutoring s
Page 160 and 161: Ohio Junior Science and Humanities
Page 162 and 163: Back to top Goal 3 - Evaluation Que
Page 164 and 165: I’ve been “forced” to read li
Page 166 and 167: The concepts and ideas that were di
Page 168 and 169: The progress of the NWO Center towa
Page 170 and 171: students. The also loved foldables.
Page 172 and 173: (TEAMS, TeachOhio and Other NWO): m
Page 174 and 175: In their open-ended evaluations and
Page 178 and 179: Appendix A Higher Education Faculty
show all

2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?