2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
professional development workshops), this year the number of workshops increased to nine.<br />
The BG SECO meetings’ attendance ranged from 8 to 30, with the average of 17 students. The<br />
BG CTM meetings’ attendance ranged from 45 to 80, with the average of 61 students. The<br />
membership of BG SECO/CTM also increased dramatically. Thus, the BG SECO had 40 new<br />
members this year while the BG CTM had 150 members, compared to the total of 49 members<br />
last year (i.e., the BG/UT SECO/CTM increased its membership by more than four times).<br />
The NWO Center also promoted deeper content learning through Praxis II workshop. A total of<br />
30 pre-service teachers attended Praxis II tutoring mathematics and science (biology) sessions<br />
on February 22, <strong>2007</strong>. This was 13% more than last year. Based on the evaluation of the Praxis<br />
II tutoring workshop by 21 participants (13 attending the Life Science tutoring session and 8<br />
attending the math tutoring session), three most common objectives for attending the workshop<br />
included learning the content (6), learning test taking strategies (12), and learning about the test<br />
format, types of questions and what to expect on the test (13). These objectives were satisfied<br />
partially or completely on the average in 55% of the cases (i.e., the participants said they<br />
received exactly or partially what they wanted from the workshop) – 50% for content, 67% for<br />
test taking strategies, and 46% for learning about the test. In 25% of the cases, the participants<br />
received what they expected and even more. In 75% of the cases when the expectations were<br />
not met, the participants admitted that they learned some other things from the workshop. Most<br />
of these cases (i.e., when the expectations were not met) involved wanting to learn about the<br />
test but learning the test taking strategies instead.<br />
Furthermore, under the auspices of the NWO Center, COSMOS continued to provide MAT<br />
scholarships to 10 students at BGSU. On the average, these students completed 14.4 credit<br />
hours in 2005-2006 and were estimated to complete 10.2 – 10.8 credit hours in 2006-<strong>2007</strong>.<br />
Scholarship funding was also provided to 4 new MAT students with the expectation that these<br />
students will complete on the average 10.5 – 11.25 credit hours. The total number of credit<br />
hours that the funded MAT students were expected to complete was 144 – 153. The data show<br />
that this expectation was fulfilled.<br />
The opportunities to gain content knowledge were also provided through such initiatives of the<br />
NWO Center as the NWO Symposium attended by 325 people, Inquiry Series attended by xxx<br />
participants affiliated with different programs as well as specific programs such as TEAMS,<br />
TeachOhio, PRISM, etc.<br />
Evaluation Highlights: Ways in Which Participants Transfer Their Knowledge into<br />
Classroom<br />
Comparing classroom observation ratings and comments across the three groups, several<br />
commonalities were observed. The aspects of the design in which the NWO participants seem<br />
to be very successful in their teaching include: careful planning and/or organization (98% of<br />
observed lessons), incorporating tasks, roles, interactions consistent with investigative science<br />
(78% of observed lessons), using collaborative approach to learning (51% of observed lessons).<br />
The observed teachers appear to need to improve on the following: providing adequate time for<br />
sense-making and wrap-up (was observed only in 39% of observed lessons), attention to<br />
students’ prior experience, preparedness and learning styles (was observed only in 19% of<br />
observed lessons), using instructional strategies and activities that reflected attention to issues<br />
of access, equity and diversity (was observed only in 6% of observed lessons). Among the<br />
recommendations for improving teaching, the following were mentioned across the three groups