2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

Recommendations

Info

last year. Half of the 2007 participants were registered to take Praxis II; 18 have not taken the test yet, 1 person took it once and 3 others took it twice; 29 were undergraduate students and 1 TeachOhio participant. Details of the attendees’ perceptions of the workshop were presented under Goal 1 – Evaluation Question 2 above and will not be repeated here. Graduate MAT program scholarships: As noted in the last year’s evaluation report, in 2005- 2006 COSMOS under the auspices of the NWO Center provided MAT scholarships to 15 students at BGSU. In 2006-2007, 10 of these students were also given the scholarship in 2006- 2007. On the average, they completed 14.4 credit hours in 2005-2006 and were estimated to complete 10.2 – 10.8 credit hours in 2006-2007. Scholarship funding was also provided to 4 new MAT students with the expectation that these students will complete on the average 10.5 – 11.25 credit hours. The total number of credit hours that the funded MAT students were expected to complete was 144 – 153. As shown in Table 10, this expectation was fulfilled. Individual student completion data are not available to establish personal credit hour completion rates. Table 10. Summer 2006-Spring 2007 Enrollment in the MAT programs and Credit Hours Successfully By Course Name Major # of MAT students Courses Taken Course Credit Hours Physics 5 PHYS 651 - Mechanics 3 Physics 6 PHYS 652 - Electromagnetism 3 Physics 6 PHYS 653 - Waves and Light 3 Physics 1 PHYS 684 - Rdng Res Physics Educ 1 Physics 1 EDTL 612 - Classroom Tech for Teachers 3 Physics 2 EDTL 645 - Prob. Tch HS Science 3 Physics 1 EDTL 680 - Cross Sch Curric Bldg 2 Physics 13 PHYS 661 - Labs/Demonstrations PHYS 1 Physics 6 PHYS 691 - Directed Research Physics 3 Physics 1 PHYS 691 - Directed Research Physics 2 Physics 5 EDTL 680 - Invest Math/Sci Education 2 Math 1 MATH 670 - FTC/Student Understanding 1 Math 3 EDTL 680 Trends/Resources Math Teach 3 Math 4 MATH 682 - Adv Mathematical Thinking 3 Math 2 EDFI 641 - Statistics in Education 3 Math 1 MATH 501 - Number Theory 3 Math 1 MATH 670 - Rdgs Geometry thru Grades 3 Math 1 MATH 670 - Rdgs Visual Appr Calculus 3 Math 1 MATH 670 - Issues with FTC 1 Math 2 MATH 603 - Algebra HS Math Teachers 3 Biology 2 BIO 540: Conservation Biology 3 Biology 1 BIO 641: Behavioral Ecology 3 Biology 1 BIO 549: Epidemiology n/a Total Physics 47 106
Total Biology 4 9 Total Math 15 43 Grand Total 66 158 Back to top Goal 1 – Evaluation Question 6: How do participants transfer the skills and knowledge received through NWO professional development into the classroom? TEAMS Participant Science Classroom Observations Results Tables 11 and 12 summarize the results of average and range of ratings given for science and mathematics lessons observed in TEAMS and Comparison groups. However, the interpretation of the comparison of the results between TEAMS and Comparison groups is not provided at this time due to the limited number of comparison observations.
Page 1 and 2:
NORTHWEST OHIO CENTER OF EXCELLENCE
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents 2 NWO Mission 2 N
Page 5 and 6:
NWO 2007 Annual Report ~ An Introdu
Page 7 and 8:
We are equally committed to identif
Page 9 and 10:
NWO Activities and Accomplishments
Page 11 and 12:
mathematics and a new interdiscipli
Page 13 and 14:
Research Learning Community In the
Page 15 and 16:
Research in Science and Mathematics
Page 17 and 18:
Learning Sciences PhD Program BGSU
Page 19 and 20:
NWO Faculty and Staff Scholarship N
Page 21 and 22:
evaluation reports are available up
Page 23 and 24:
In order to determine progress towa
Page 25 and 26:
In sum, we are both proud of our FY
Page 27 and 28:
The tables below show amounts spent
Page 29 and 30:
COSMOS Collaborative Council (CCC)
Page 31 and 32:
NWO Projected Goals and Activities
Page 33 and 34:
Goal 3: Conduct and communicate col
Page 35 and 36:
NWO Resource Development and Sustai
Page 37 and 38:
2007 Yr. Avg. 2006 Yr. Avg. 2005 Yr
Page 39 and 40:
Issues, Problems, and Anticipated S
Page 41 and 42:
Appendices 2 0 0 7 N W O Ce n t e r
Page 43 and 44:
Appendix A: Regional Grants to Part
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Appendix B: 2006 Northwest Ohio Sym
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix D: Larabee Mini-Grant: The
Page 65 and 66:
Appendix E: Redesigned/Developed Co
Page 67 and 68:
Appendix F: NWO Faculty and Staff S
Page 69 and 70:
Appendix F: NWO Faculty and Staff S
Page 71 and 72:
Appendix G: COSMOS Publication: Mor
Page 73 and 74:
Appendix G: COSMOS Publication: Mor
Page 75 and 76:
Appendix H: COSMOS Publication: Van
Page 77 and 78:
Appendix I: COSMOS Publication: Van
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix K: COSMOS Publicity: RIPE
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix L: COSMOS Publicity: REAL
Page 87 and 88:
Appendix N: 2006-07 REAL Recruiting
Page 89 and 90: Appendix P: NWO TEAMS Recruiting Br
Page 91 and 92: Appendix Q: TeachOhio Recruiting Br
Page 93 and 94: Appendix R: Executive Board Minutes
Page 95 and 96: Appendix R: Executive Board Minutes
Page 97 and 98: Appendix S: NWO Executive Board Byl
Page 99 and 100: Appendix S: NWO Executive Board Byl
Page 101 and 102: Appendix T: COSMOS Collaborative Co
Page 109 and 110: Appendix U: NWO Evaluation Report M
Page 111 and 112: Evaluation Question 5: In what ways
Page 113 and 114: References 71 Appendix 72
Page 115 and 116: Back to top Original NWO Goals The
Page 117: Part II. Evaluation Goals, Question
Page 120 and 121: Table 1. Alignment of NWO Center Go
Page 122 and 123: depth information from the particip
Page 124 and 125: Observations: Horizon’s Classroom
Page 126 and 127: Observations: Horizon’s Classroom
Page 128 and 129: and capsule). Supporting qualitativ
Page 130 and 131: negative direction. However, these
Page 132 and 133: Table 7. Summary of the TBI Survey
Page 134 and 135: NWO Symposium: The overall rating f
Page 136 and 137: Detailed Results for NWO PD Session
Page 138 and 139: elieved that doing such experiments
Page 142 and 143: Table 11. Average and Range of TEAM
Page 144 and 145: elements of science abstraction (1)
Page 146 and 147: teacher appeared confident in abili
Page 148 and 149: Table 13. Average TeachOhio Science
Page 150 and 151: Recommendations at the post-observa
Page 152 and 153: Recommendations included: Increase
Page 154 and 155: knowledge (1); incorporate tasks th
Page 156 and 157: Content 3.75 3 3.4 3.5 3.75 3.5 5 C
Page 158 and 159: tests attended PRAXIS II tutoring s
Page 160 and 161: Ohio Junior Science and Humanities
Page 162 and 163: Back to top Goal 3 - Evaluation Que
Page 164 and 165: I’ve been “forced” to read li
Page 166 and 167: The concepts and ideas that were di
Page 168 and 169: The progress of the NWO Center towa
Page 170 and 171: students. The also loved foldables.
Page 172 and 173: (TEAMS, TeachOhio and Other NWO): m
Page 174 and 175: In their open-ended evaluations and
Page 176 and 177: • more intellectual engagement of
Page 178 and 179: Appendix A Higher Education Faculty
show all

2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?