03.12.2012 Views

2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part II. Evaluation Goals, Questions, and<br />

Procedures<br />

Evaluation Goals and Questions<br />

The overall goal of the 2006-<strong>2007</strong> annual evaluation of the NWO Center was to determine the<br />

progress of the Center towards the attainment of its revised goals. This was accomplished by<br />

formulating evaluation/research questions specific for each goal, aligning the Center<br />

initiatives/activities/programs/events with each goal, and identifying multiple data sources that<br />

could be triangulated to enhance the validity of the findings (see Table 1 for details).<br />

Table 1. Alignment of NWO Center Goals and Initiatives/Activities with the Evaluation<br />

Questions and Data Sources<br />

Revised NWO<br />

Center Goals<br />

Goal 1: Enhance<br />

the preparation of<br />

pre-service and<br />

in-service<br />

teachers though<br />

research based<br />

professional<br />

development<br />

focusing on<br />

investigative<br />

mathematics and<br />

science teaching<br />

and learning<br />

NWO Center<br />

Activities/<br />

Initiatives<br />

- Undergraduate<br />

and graduate<br />

course or<br />

program<br />

modification<br />

- Undergraduate<br />

professional<br />

organizations<br />

(BG-UT SECO<br />

and CTM)<br />

- Praxis II<br />

Preparation<br />

Workshop<br />

- Graduate MAT<br />

program<br />

scholarships<br />

- NWO<br />

Symposium<br />

- Inquiry Series<br />

- Affiliated<br />

Programs<br />

(TEAMS,<br />

TeachOhio,<br />

PRISM,<br />

DREAMS)<br />

Evaluation Questions Evaluation Data Sources<br />

1). What are the beliefs and practices<br />

of NWO participants? How do these<br />

beliefs compare for TEAMS,<br />

TeachOhio and Other NWO<br />

participants?<br />

2). What are the emic and etic<br />

perceptions regarding the<br />

effectiveness of the NWO professional<br />

development?<br />

3). How do participants perceive that<br />

NWO activities have impacted their<br />

beliefs and practices?<br />

4). How have the universities<br />

responded by developing/ revising<br />

courses/programs to better prepare<br />

teachers?<br />

5). In what ways are participants<br />

deepening their content knowledge in<br />

their subject areas?<br />

6). How do participants transfer skills<br />

and knowledge received through NWO<br />

professional development into the<br />

classroom?<br />

Used to Answer These<br />

Questions<br />

- TBI survey data<br />

- Session evaluations<br />

- Teacher Interviews<br />

- Faculty Interviews<br />

- PD Observations<br />

- # courses developed and/or<br />

modified;<br />

- Faculty interviews<br />

# of students in MAT programs; #<br />

hours successfully completed<br />

each year; names of courses<br />

completed; # SECO/CTM<br />

meetings; attendance at<br />

SECO/CTM meetings; #<br />

members in SECO/CTM; faculty<br />

interviews; attendance of Praxis<br />

II Tutoring sessions in math and<br />

science; workshop evaluation by<br />

participants<br />

- Classroom observations<br />

- Teacher interviews

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!