2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
2007 ANNUAL REPORT - cosmos - Bowling Green State University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
knowledge (1); incorporate tasks that tap prior-knowledge (1); and incorporate tasks to help<br />
students see mathematics as a dynamic discipline enriched by conjecture (1).<br />
Note: the numbers in parentheses indicate how many of the five observed lessons this was applicable to.<br />
Classroom Culture: A rating of 3.5 was given for the COSMOS mathematics teacher’s<br />
observed lesson classroom culture.<br />
Strengths included: students working collaboratively (1); active participation of all was<br />
encouraged (1); climate of respect for students’ questions (2); interactions among the students<br />
reflected collegial working relationships among students (2); interactions between the instructors<br />
reflected a collaborative working relationship between teacher and students (1); and the climate<br />
of the classroom encouraged students to generate ideas, questions or conjectures (1).<br />
Note: the numbers in parentheses indicate how many of the five observed lessons this was applicable to.<br />
Recommendations included: incorporate intellectual rigor and the challenging of ideas (1).<br />
Note: the numbers in parentheses indicate how many of the five observed lessons this was applicable to.<br />
Overall Capsule : A rating of 3.0 was given for the COSMOS mathematics teacher’s observed<br />
lesson overall capsule.<br />
Rationale included: Students’ appeared to be confident in doing this particular mathematic skill<br />
(1); the teacher provided students with a project that in many ways was consistent with<br />
investigative mathematics (1); students had a genuine interest and appreciation for the<br />
discipline (1); students were able to apply this mathematic skill to real-world situations (1); The<br />
project involved real-world application and related to prior content (1); students were able to<br />
carry out their own inquires (1); students understanding of mathematics as a dynamic body of<br />
knowledge could have been improved using more investigation concepts (1); and lesson as<br />
observed was somewhat limited in its likelihood to enhance students’ understanding of<br />
mathematics or to develop their capacity to successfully do mathematics.<br />
Note: the numbers in parentheses indicate how many of the five observed lessons this was applicable to.<br />
Back to top<br />
Comparison of Classroom Observation Ratings Across NWO Projects<br />
Comparing classroom observation ratings and comments across the three groups, several<br />
commonalities were observed. The aspects of the design in which the NWO participants seem<br />
to be very successful in their teaching include: careful planning and/or organization (98% of<br />
observed lessons), incorporating tasks, roles, interactions consistent with investigative science<br />
(78% of observed lessons), using collaborative approach to learning (51% of observed lessons).<br />
The observed teachers appear to need to improve on the following: providing adequate time for<br />
sense-making and wrap-up (was observed only in 39% of observed lessons), attention to<br />
students’ prior experience, preparedness and learning styles (was observed only in 19% of<br />
observed lessons), using instructional strategies and activities that reflected attention to issues<br />
of access, equity and diversity (was observed only in 6% of observed lessons). Among the<br />
recommendations for improving teaching, the following were mentioned across the three groups<br />
(TEAMS, TeachOhio and Other NWO): more time for sense-making and wrap-up, more<br />
investigative tasks and strategies, and greater encouragement of collaborative learning.