13.07.2015 Views

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4excellent COD removal performance. On average, the permeate COD was less than 15mg·L -1 <strong>with</strong> COD removals above 95%. The absence of suspended solids, the very low COD concentration <strong>and</strong> the levelof nutrients in the effluent allow reusing purified wastewater (e.g. in agriculture). The application of anoxic cycles in the first chamber of the MBR did notestimulate denitrification process as a consequence of the worsening on nitrificationcapacity. The proposed system showed flexibility to convert total nitrogen to NH 4+<strong>and</strong>/orNO 3- . Biogas production was detected during the whole operating period, <strong>with</strong> averagemethane content of 75-80%. Due to effective retention of biomass by the UASB reactor<strong>and</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> module, sludge concentration in the <strong>anaerobic</strong> bioreactor could be kept athigh values, reaching more than 30 g·L -1 . Moreover, granular sludge growth was observed. The employment of internal recirculation from aerobic biofilm chamber of the MBRto the UASB allowed diminishing biomass production, to values similar than thoseobserved for the <strong>anaerobic</strong> treatment. The <strong>membrane</strong> was operated at ambient temperature <strong>with</strong> fluxes of 15 L·m -2·h -1 ,lower than those achieved in aerobic MBRs treating municipal wastewater, but higher thanfluxes obtained in AnMBR. The only difference between the two proposed configurations was the better<strong>membrane</strong> performance observed during period II, when recirculation was turned off <strong>and</strong>the system could be considered as a UASB reactor <strong>with</strong> an aerobic MBR post-treatment. In this kind of configurations is important to assure a minimum F/M ratio in theMBR in order to reach a suitable MLVSS concentration for <strong>membrane</strong> operation.4.6. ReferencesAPHA-AWWA-WPCF. 1998. St<strong>and</strong>ard Methods for the Examination of Water <strong>and</strong> Wastewater, 20 thed., American Public Health Association, Washington, USA.Bouhabila, H., Ben Aïm, R., Buisson, H. 2001. Fouling characterisation in <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors.Separation <strong>and</strong> Purification Technology 22-23, 123-132.Brepols, C. 2011. Operating large scale <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment,1 st ed., IWA publishing, London, UK.126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!