Impact of a methanogenic pre-treatment on the performance of an aerobic MBR system Batch experiments demonstrated that the hydrolysis of aerobic biomass in<strong>anaerobic</strong> conditions led to a release of biopolymers, <strong>and</strong> hence an increase in TEP,colloidal BPC, SMP carbohydrate <strong>and</strong> SMP protein concentration. It was demonstrated that the presence of plastic support positively influence<strong>membrane</strong> performance. As expected, MLVSS concentration was shown to be an important parameter inorder to protect the <strong>membrane</strong> against the fouling provoked by soluble <strong>and</strong> colloidalbiopolymers.5.6. ReferencesArruda Fatibello, S.H.S., Henriques Vieira, A.A., Fatibello-Filho, O. 2004. A rapidspectrophotometric method for the determination of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) infreshwater. Talanta 62, 81–85APHA-AWWA-WPCF. 1998. St<strong>and</strong>ard Methods for the Examination of Water <strong>and</strong> Wastewater, 20 thed., American Public Health Association, Washington, USA.Berubé, P.R., Hall, E.R., Sutton, P.M. 2006. Parameters Governing Permeate Flux in an AnaerobicMembrane Bioreactor Treating Low-Strength Municipal Wastewaters: A Literature Review.Water Environmental Research 78, 887-897.BREF 2006, Integrated pollution prevention <strong>and</strong> control, reference document on best availabletechniques in the food, drink <strong>and</strong> milk industries.Buntner, D., Sánchez, A., Garrido, J.M. 2011. Three stages MBR (methanogenic, aerobic biofilm<strong>and</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> filtration) for the treatment of low-strength wastewaters. Water Science <strong>and</strong>Technology 64(2), 397-402.Chong, S., Sen, T.K., Kayaalp, A., Ang, H.M. 2012. The performance enhancements of upflow<strong>anaerobic</strong> sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for domestic sludge treatment – A State-of-the-artreview. Water Research 46, 3434-3470.de la Torre, T., Lesjean, B., Drews, A., Kraume, M. 2008. Monitoring of transparent exopolymerparticles (TEP) in a <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor (MBR) <strong>and</strong> correlation <strong>with</strong> other fouling indicators.Water Science <strong>and</strong> Technology 58(10), 1903-1910.Drews, A. 2010. Membrane fouling in <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors—Characterisation, contradictions,cause <strong>and</strong> cures. Journal of Membrane Science 363, 1–28Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., Smith, F. 1956. Colorimetric method fordetermination of sugars <strong>and</strong> related substances. Analytical chemistry 28, 350-356.He, S.-B., Wang, B.-Z., Wang, L., Jiang, Y.-F., Zhang, L.-Q. 2003. A novel approach to treatcombined domestic wastewater <strong>and</strong> excess sludge in MBR. Journal of Environmental Science15(5), 674–679.145
Chapter 5Ho, J., Sung, S. 2010. Methanogenic activities in <strong>anaerobic</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors (AnMBR)treating synthetic municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology 101(7), 2191-2196.Jeison, D., van Lier, J.B. 2006. Cake layer formation in <strong>anaerobic</strong> <strong>submerged</strong> <strong>membrane</strong>bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science 284, 227–236.Judd, S.J. 2002. Submerged <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors: flat plate or hollow fibre? Filtration <strong>and</strong>Separation 39(5), 30-31.Judd, S.J. 2011. The MBR Book: Principles <strong>and</strong> Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water<strong>and</strong> Wastewater Treatment, 2 nd Ed, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford.Kushwaha, J.P., Srivastava, V.C., Mall, I.D. 2011. An overview of various technologies for thetreatment of dairy wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Food Science <strong>and</strong> Nutrition 51, 442-452.Le-Clech, P., Jefferson, B., Chang, I.S., Judd, S.J. 2003. Critical flux determination by the flux-stepmethod in a <strong>submerged</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor, Journal of Membrane Science 227, 81-93.Le-Clech, P., Chen V., Fane, T.A.G. 2006. Fouling in <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors used in wastewatertreatment. Journal of Membrane Science 284, 17-53.Lew, B., Tarreb, S., Beliavski, M., Dosoretzb, C., Green, M. 2009. Anaerobic <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor(AnMBR) for domestic wastewater treatment. Desalination 243, 251–257.Liu, Q., Wang, X.C., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Du, Y. 2010. Performance of a hybrid <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactorin municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination 258, 143-147.Lowry, O.H., Rosenbrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., R<strong>and</strong>all, R.J. 1951. Protein measurements <strong>with</strong> the folinphenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 193(1), 265- 275.Passow, U. 2002. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments. Progress inoceanography 55, 287-333.Robles, A., Ruano, M.V., Ribes, J., Ferrer, J. 2013. Factors that affect the permeability of comercialhollow-fibre <strong>membrane</strong>s in a <strong>submerged</strong> <strong>anaerobic</strong> MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system. WaterResearch 47, 1277-1288.Rosenberger, S., Evenblij, H., te Poele, S., Wintgens, T., Laabs, C. 2005. The importance of liquidphase analyses to underst<strong>and</strong> fouling in <strong>membrane</strong> assisted activated sludge processes -sixcase studies of different European research groups. Journal of Membrane Science 263, 113–126.Rosenberger, S., Laabs, C., Lesjean, B., Gnirss, R., Amy, G., Jekel, M., Schrotter, J.-C. 2006.Impact of colloidal <strong>and</strong> soluble organic material on <strong>membrane</strong> performance in <strong>membrane</strong>bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Research 40, 710–720.Sherr, E.B. 1988. Direct use of high molecular weight polysaccharides by heterotrophic flagellates.Nature 335, 348-351.Spagni, A., Casu, S., Crispino, N.A., Farina, R., Mattioli. D. 2010. Filterability in a <strong>submerged</strong><strong>anaerobic</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor. Desalination 250, 787-792.Sun, F.-Y., Wang, X.-M., Li, X.-Y. 2008. Visualisation <strong>and</strong> characterisation of biopolymer clusters ina <strong>submerged</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 325, 691–697.146
- Page 3:
UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTE
- Page 6 and 7:
padres Macario y Marisa, les agrade
- Page 8 and 9:
2.1.2. Nitrogen compounds 662.1.2.1
- Page 10:
Chapter 4: Combining UASB and MBR f
- Page 14 and 15:
Objetivos y resumenEsta tesis se en
- Page 16 and 17:
Objetivos y resumenpermeabilidad de
- Page 18 and 19:
Objetivos y resumenuno de los pará
- Page 20 and 21:
Objetivos y resumenel sistema propu
- Page 22:
Objetivos y resumenconcentraciones
- Page 25 and 26:
Obxectivos e resumoauga tratada. O
- Page 27 and 28:
Obxectivos e resumoNo Capítulo 3,
- Page 29 and 30:
Obxectivos e resumog·L -1 , valore
- Page 31 and 32:
Obxectivos e resumoparámetros clav
- Page 34 and 35:
Objectives and summaryThis thesis i
- Page 36 and 37:
Objectives and summaryOn the basis
- Page 38 and 39:
Objectives and summaryfrom the MBR
- Page 40 and 41:
Objectives and summaryconsidering t
- Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 1IntroductionSummaryIn this
- Page 44 and 45:
IntroductionThe combination of memb
- Page 46 and 47:
IntroductionThe membranes should ha
- Page 48 and 49:
Introductionof water. Energy saving
- Page 50 and 51:
number of plants (cum. values)Intro
- Page 52 and 53:
IntroductionSubmerged MBR system in
- Page 54 and 55:
Introductionchanges of the foulant
- Page 56 and 57:
Introductionof 2% NaOH and 0.5% cit
- Page 58 and 59:
IntroductionFigure 1.8. Posible rel
- Page 60 and 61:
IntroductionSide-stream MBRs involv
- Page 62 and 63:
Introductionutilizes the advantages
- Page 64 and 65:
Introductionmeans of settlers, of s
- Page 66 and 67:
IntroductionUASB, achieving total n
- Page 68 and 69:
IntroductionEvenblij, H., van der G
- Page 70 and 71:
IntroductionMtinch, E.V., Ban, K.,
- Page 72:
IntroductionYang, S., Yang, F., Fu,
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 22.1. Liquid phaseIn this s
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 2where:M fas: molarity of F
- Page 79 and 80:
Acetic Acid (mg·L -1 )Chapter 2VFA
- Page 81 and 82:
N-NO 2-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 22.1.2.2.
- Page 83 and 84:
N-NO 3-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 2interfer
- Page 85 and 86:
P-PO 43-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 2Interfe
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 2alkalinity (IA), which is
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 22.2.3. Sludge volumetric i
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 2eq. 2.10eq. 2.11eq. 2.12Th
- Page 93 and 94:
Carbohydrate (mg·L -1 )Chapter 2In
- Page 95 and 96:
TEP (mgXG·L -1 )Chapter 22.4.4.4.
- Page 97 and 98:
Chapter 2Ripley, L.E., Boyle, W.C.,
- Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 33.1. IntroductionIn recent
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 3same in both modules; tap
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 3phases were varied (table
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 3to time was higher than 10
- Page 107 and 108: COD removal (%)Chapter 3120100Perio
- Page 109 and 110: DTN and N-NH 4+ (mg·L-1 )DTN and N
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3operated with high MLTSS c
- Page 113 and 114: TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa
- Page 115 and 116: SMP carbohydrates (mg·L -1 )Chapte
- Page 117 and 118: Volume (%)Chapter 3Therefore, the c
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 3identical to that of the c
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 3Massé, A. Spérandio, M.,
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 44.1. IntroductionThe appli
- Page 125 and 126: Chapter 4support were added in this
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 4This cleaning was performe
- Page 129 and 130: COD (mg·L -1 )COD removal (%)OLR (
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 4the recirculation ratio be
- Page 133 and 134: (mg·L -1 )Chapter 4and ammonium) n
- Page 135 and 136: Chapter 4recirculation from the MBR
- Page 137 and 138: Chapter 4days 57 (period I) and 316
- Page 139 and 140: Chapter 4excellent COD removal perf
- Page 141 and 142: Chapter 4Rosenberger, S., Evenblij,
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 55.1. IntroductionAnaerobic
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 55.3. Material and methods5
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 5represented an increment o
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 5operating with similar mem
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 5behaviour might be related
- Page 153 and 154: Fouling Rate (Pa·min -1 )Fouling R
- Page 155 and 156: Concentration (mg·L -1 )DOC (mg·L
- Page 157: Chapter 5in table 5.3 showed that h
- Page 162 and 163: Chapter 6Denitrification with disso
- Page 164 and 165: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 166 and 167: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 168 and 169: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 170 and 171: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 172 and 173: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 174 and 175: (mg·L -1 )Denitrification with dis
- Page 176 and 177: DTN effluent (mg·L -1 )CH 4 desorb
- Page 178 and 179: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 180 and 181: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 182 and 183: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 184 and 185: Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 186 and 187: Chapter 7Membrane fouling in an AnM
- Page 188 and 189: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 190 and 191: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 192 and 193: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 194 and 195: OLR and ORR(kgCOD ·m -3·d -1 )pHO
- Page 196 and 197: TEP removed (mg·L -1 )OA removed (
- Page 198 and 199: R col (m -1 )SRF (m·kg -1 )Membran
- Page 200 and 201: BPC, cBPC and TEP concentration(mg
- Page 202 and 203: Cake and Colloidal Resistance (m -1
- Page 204 and 205: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 206 and 207: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 208:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 211 and 212:
Conclusionessentido, el uso de una
- Page 213 and 214:
Conclusionesensuciamiento de la mem
- Page 215 and 216:
Conclusiónspresenza de soporte de
- Page 217 and 218:
Conclusións6. Aplicabilidade e per
- Page 219 and 220:
ConclusionsMoreover, biomass concen
- Page 221 and 222:
Conclusionstechnology and interesti
- Page 223 and 224:
List of symbolsHFHRTHyVABHollow Fib
- Page 225 and 226:
List of symbolsFR/J Normalized Foul
- Page 227 and 228:
List of publicationsBrand, C., Sán
- Page 229:
List of publicationsConference on E