IntroductionUASB, achieving total nitrogen removal percentages up to 60% <strong>and</strong> removing up to 95% ofdissolved methane.In this sense, it is important to underline that the presence of dissolved methane,especially at low temperature, represents an important environmental problem in terms ofgreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of wastewaters treated using methanogenic bioreactors.For low strength wastewaters, dissolved methane might account up to 50% of theproduced methane. The dissolved methane is easily desorbed from the effluents,especially if these are either released in the environment or post-treated using aerobicbioreactors.All the examples mentioned before demonstrate that integration of <strong>anaerobic</strong>processes (in particular methanogenesis) <strong>with</strong> simultaneous nitrification <strong>and</strong> denitrificationis possible. Moreover, application of MBR, a very low COD concentration <strong>and</strong> the level ofnutrients in the effluent (e.g. in the case of water reuse in agriculture, nitrogen eliminationcould be not necessary) allows obtaining a high quality, re-usable effluent, which mightconduce to significant water savings.On the other h<strong>and</strong>, biogas rich <strong>with</strong> methane can be produced, depending on thewastewater treated. Relatively high <strong>membrane</strong> fluxes could be obtained, being higher thanthose applied in the case of AnMBR, <strong>and</strong> similar to aerobic MBRs.1.7. ReferencesAkram, A., Stuckey, D.C. 2008. Flux <strong>and</strong> performance improvement in a <strong>submerged</strong> <strong>anaerobic</strong><strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). ProcessBiochemistry 43, 93-102.An, Y., Yang, F., Chua, H. C., Wong, F. S., Wu, B. 2008. The integration of methanogenesis <strong>with</strong>shortcut nitrification <strong>and</strong> denitrification in a combined UASB <strong>with</strong> MBR. BioresourceTechnology 99, 3714–3720.An, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Yang, D., Zhou, Q. 2009. Characterization of <strong>membrane</strong> foulants in an<strong>anaerobic</strong> non-woven fabric <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment,Chemical Engineering Journal 155, 709–715.Artiga, P., Oyanedel, V., Garrido, J.M., Méndez, R. 2005. An innovative biofilm-suspended biomasshybrid <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor for wastewater treatment, Desalination 179, 171-179.AWWA-Lyonaisse des eaux. 1998. Tratamiento del agua por procesos de membrana. Ed. McGraw-Hill, Madrid, Spain.Barker DJ, Stuckey DC. 1999. A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewatertreatment systems. Water Research 33, 3063–82.53
Chapter 1Brepols, C. 2011. Operating large scale <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment,1 st ed., IWA publishing, London.Buntner, D., Sánchez, A., Garrido, J.M. 2011. Three stages MBR (methanogenic, aerobic biofilm<strong>and</strong> <strong>membrane</strong> filtration) for the treatment of low-strength wastewaters. Water Science <strong>and</strong>Technology 64(2), 397-402.Burbano, A. A.,. Adham, S. S., Pearce, W.R. 2007. The state of full-scale RO/NF desalination –Results from a worldwide survey. Journal AWWA 99(4), 116-127.Cho, B.D., Fane, A.G. 2002. Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical flux operation of a<strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 209, 391–403.Chang, I.-S., Lee, C.-H. 1998. Membrane filtration characteristics in <strong>membrane</strong>-coupled activatedsludge system -- the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on <strong>membrane</strong> fouling.Desalination 120, 221-233.Chang, I.-S., Le Clech, P., Jefferson, B., Judd, S. 2002 Membrane fouling in <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactorsfor wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering 128, 1018–1029.Christensson, M., Wel<strong>and</strong>er, T. 2004. Treatment of municipal wastewater in a hybrid process usinga new suspended carrier <strong>with</strong> large surface area. Water Science <strong>and</strong> Technology, 49(11-12),207–214.Citulsky, J.A., Farahbakhsh, K., Kent, F.C. 2009. Effect of total suspended solids loading on shorttermfouling in the treatment of secondary effluent by an immersed ultrafiltration pilot system.Water Environmental Research 81(12), 2427-2436.Côté, P., Siverns, S., Monti, S. 2005. Comparison of Membrane-based Solutions for WaterReclamation <strong>and</strong> Desalination. Desalination 182, 51–257.de la Torre, T., Lesjean, B., Drews, A., Kraume, M. 2008. Monitoring of transparent exopolymerparticles (TEP) in a <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactor (MBR) <strong>and</strong> correlation <strong>with</strong> other fouling indicators.Water Science <strong>and</strong> Technology 58(10), 1903-1910.Drews, A., Vocks, M., Iversen, V., Lesjean, B. Kraume, M. 2005. Influence of unsteady <strong>membrane</strong>bioreactor operation on eps formation <strong>and</strong> filtration resistance, Proceedings of InternationalCongress on Membranes <strong>and</strong> Membrane Processes (ICOM), Seoul, Korea.Drews, A. 2010. Membrane fouling in <strong>membrane</strong> bioreactors—Characterisation, contradictions,cause <strong>and</strong> cures. Journal of Membrane Science 363, 1–28.Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method fordetermination of sugars <strong>and</strong> related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28, 350–356.European Patent 148427 B1. Hybrid Biological Membrane Reactor for the Treatment of Urban <strong>and</strong>Industrial Waste Water. Inventors: Oyanedel V., Garrido J.M., Méndez R.. Propietor: Universityof Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Priority 1 February 2002.Evans, B., Laughton, P. (1994) Emerging trends in electrical usage at Canadian (Ontario) municipalwastewater treatment facilities <strong>and</strong> strategies for improving energy efficiency. Water Science<strong>and</strong> Technology 30(4), 17-23.54
- Page 3:
UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTE
- Page 6 and 7:
padres Macario y Marisa, les agrade
- Page 8 and 9:
2.1.2. Nitrogen compounds 662.1.2.1
- Page 10:
Chapter 4: Combining UASB and MBR f
- Page 14 and 15:
Objetivos y resumenEsta tesis se en
- Page 16 and 17: Objetivos y resumenpermeabilidad de
- Page 18 and 19: Objetivos y resumenuno de los pará
- Page 20 and 21: Objetivos y resumenel sistema propu
- Page 22: Objetivos y resumenconcentraciones
- Page 25 and 26: Obxectivos e resumoauga tratada. O
- Page 27 and 28: Obxectivos e resumoNo Capítulo 3,
- Page 29 and 30: Obxectivos e resumog·L -1 , valore
- Page 31 and 32: Obxectivos e resumoparámetros clav
- Page 34 and 35: Objectives and summaryThis thesis i
- Page 36 and 37: Objectives and summaryOn the basis
- Page 38 and 39: Objectives and summaryfrom the MBR
- Page 40 and 41: Objectives and summaryconsidering t
- Page 42 and 43: Chapter 1IntroductionSummaryIn this
- Page 44 and 45: IntroductionThe combination of memb
- Page 46 and 47: IntroductionThe membranes should ha
- Page 48 and 49: Introductionof water. Energy saving
- Page 50 and 51: number of plants (cum. values)Intro
- Page 52 and 53: IntroductionSubmerged MBR system in
- Page 54 and 55: Introductionchanges of the foulant
- Page 56 and 57: Introductionof 2% NaOH and 0.5% cit
- Page 58 and 59: IntroductionFigure 1.8. Posible rel
- Page 60 and 61: IntroductionSide-stream MBRs involv
- Page 62 and 63: Introductionutilizes the advantages
- Page 64 and 65: Introductionmeans of settlers, of s
- Page 68 and 69: IntroductionEvenblij, H., van der G
- Page 70 and 71: IntroductionMtinch, E.V., Ban, K.,
- Page 72: IntroductionYang, S., Yang, F., Fu,
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 22.1. Liquid phaseIn this s
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 2where:M fas: molarity of F
- Page 79 and 80: Acetic Acid (mg·L -1 )Chapter 2VFA
- Page 81 and 82: N-NO 2-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 22.1.2.2.
- Page 83 and 84: N-NO 3-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 2interfer
- Page 85 and 86: P-PO 43-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 2Interfe
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 2alkalinity (IA), which is
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 22.2.3. Sludge volumetric i
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 2eq. 2.10eq. 2.11eq. 2.12Th
- Page 93 and 94: Carbohydrate (mg·L -1 )Chapter 2In
- Page 95 and 96: TEP (mgXG·L -1 )Chapter 22.4.4.4.
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 2Ripley, L.E., Boyle, W.C.,
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 33.1. IntroductionIn recent
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 3same in both modules; tap
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 3phases were varied (table
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 3to time was higher than 10
- Page 107 and 108: COD removal (%)Chapter 3120100Perio
- Page 109 and 110: DTN and N-NH 4+ (mg·L-1 )DTN and N
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3operated with high MLTSS c
- Page 113 and 114: TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa
- Page 115 and 116: SMP carbohydrates (mg·L -1 )Chapte
- Page 117 and 118:
Volume (%)Chapter 3Therefore, the c
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 3identical to that of the c
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 3Massé, A. Spérandio, M.,
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 44.1. IntroductionThe appli
- Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 4support were added in this
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 4This cleaning was performe
- Page 129 and 130:
COD (mg·L -1 )COD removal (%)OLR (
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 4the recirculation ratio be
- Page 133 and 134:
(mg·L -1 )Chapter 4and ammonium) n
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 4recirculation from the MBR
- Page 137 and 138:
Chapter 4days 57 (period I) and 316
- Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 4excellent COD removal perf
- Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 4Rosenberger, S., Evenblij,
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 55.1. IntroductionAnaerobic
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 55.3. Material and methods5
- Page 147 and 148:
Chapter 5represented an increment o
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 5operating with similar mem
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 5behaviour might be related
- Page 153 and 154:
Fouling Rate (Pa·min -1 )Fouling R
- Page 155 and 156:
Concentration (mg·L -1 )DOC (mg·L
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 5in table 5.3 showed that h
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 5Ho, J., Sung, S. 2010. Met
- Page 162 and 163:
Chapter 6Denitrification with disso
- Page 164 and 165:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 166 and 167:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 168 and 169:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 170 and 171:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 172 and 173:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 174 and 175:
(mg·L -1 )Denitrification with dis
- Page 176 and 177:
DTN effluent (mg·L -1 )CH 4 desorb
- Page 178 and 179:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 180 and 181:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 182 and 183:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 184 and 185:
Denitrification with dissolved meth
- Page 186 and 187:
Chapter 7Membrane fouling in an AnM
- Page 188 and 189:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 190 and 191:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 192 and 193:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 194 and 195:
OLR and ORR(kgCOD ·m -3·d -1 )pHO
- Page 196 and 197:
TEP removed (mg·L -1 )OA removed (
- Page 198 and 199:
R col (m -1 )SRF (m·kg -1 )Membran
- Page 200 and 201:
BPC, cBPC and TEP concentration(mg
- Page 202 and 203:
Cake and Colloidal Resistance (m -1
- Page 204 and 205:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 206 and 207:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 208:
Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
- Page 211 and 212:
Conclusionessentido, el uso de una
- Page 213 and 214:
Conclusionesensuciamiento de la mem
- Page 215 and 216:
Conclusiónspresenza de soporte de
- Page 217 and 218:
Conclusións6. Aplicabilidade e per
- Page 219 and 220:
ConclusionsMoreover, biomass concen
- Page 221 and 222:
Conclusionstechnology and interesti
- Page 223 and 224:
List of symbolsHFHRTHyVABHollow Fib
- Page 225 and 226:
List of symbolsFR/J Normalized Foul
- Page 227 and 228:
List of publicationsBrand, C., Sán
- Page 229:
List of publicationsConference on E