Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treating industrial wastewater at high total solids concentrationsJeison, D., van Lier, J.B. 2006. Cake layer formation in anaerobic submerged membranebioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science 284, 227-236.Kanai, M., Ferre, V., Wakahara, S., Yamamoto, T., Moro, M. 2010. A novel combination of methanefermentation and MBR - Kubota submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor process.Desalination 250, 964-967.Kang, I.J., Yoon, S.H., Lee, C.H. 2002. Comparison of the filtration characteristics of organic andinorganic membranes in a membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor. Water Research 36,1803-1813.Kataoka, N., Tokiwa, Y., Tanaka, Y., Fujiki, K., Taroda, H., Takeda, K. 1992. Examination ofBacterial Characteristics of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors in Three Pilot-Scale Plants forTreating Low-Strength Wastewater by Application of the Colony-Forming-Curve Analysis.Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 2751.Kitamura, Y., Maekawa, T., Tagawa, A., Hayashi, H., Farrell-Poe, K. L. 1996. Treatment of StrongOrganic, Nitrogenous Wastewater by an Anaerobic Contact Process IncorporatingUltrafiltration. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 12, 709.Kroeker, E. J., Schulte, D. D., Sparling, A. B., Lapp, H. M. 1979. Anaerobic treatment processstability. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 51, 718-727.Le-Clech, P., Jefferson, B., Chang, I.S., Judd, S.J. 2003. Critical flux determination by the flux-stepmethod in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 227, 81-93.Li, Y.-Z., He, Y.-L., Liu, Y.-H., Yang, S.-C., Zhang, G.-J. 2005. Comparison of the filtrationcharacteristics between biological powdered activated carbon sludge and activated sludge insubmerged membrane bioreactors. Desalination 174, 305–314.Li, X., Wang, X. 2006. Modelling of membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor.Journal of Membrane Science 278, 151-161.Lin, H.J., Xie, K., Mahendran, B., Bagley, D.M., Leung, K.T., Liss, S.N., Liao, B.Q. 2009. Sludgeproperties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membranebioreactors (AnMBRs). Water Research 43, 3827-3837.Lubbecke, A., Vogelpohl, A., Dewjanin, W. 1995. Wastewater treatment in a biological highperformancesystem with high biomass concentration. Water Research 29, 793.Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York,2003.Ng, C.A., Sun, D., Fane, A.G. 2008. Operation of membrane bioreactor with powdered activatedcarbon addition. Separation Science and Technology 41, 1447–1466.Park, H., Choo, K., Lee, C. 1999. Flux enhancement with powdered activated carbon addition in themembrane anaerobic bioreactor. Separation Science and Technology 34(14), 2781-2792.Passow, U. 2002. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments. Progress inoceanography 55, 287-333.Robles, A., Ruano, M.V., Ribes, J., Ferrer, J. 2013. Factors that affect the permeability of comercialhollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system. WaterResearch 47, 1277-1288.193
Chapter 7Rosenberger, S., Krüger, U., Witzig, R., Manz, W., Szewzyk, U., Kraume, M. 2002. Performance ofa bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water.Water Research 36, 413–420.Rosenberger, S., Laabs, C., Lesjean, B., Gnirss, R., Amy, G., Jekel, M., Schrotter, J.-C. 2006.Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membranebioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Research 40, 710– 720.Saddoud, A., Ellouze, M., Dhouib, A., Sayadi, S. 2007. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatmentof domestic wastewater in Tunisia. Desalination 207, 205–215.Sánchez, A., Buntner, D., Garrido, J.M. 2013. Impact of methanogenic pre-treatment on theperformance of an aerobic MBR system. Water Research 47, 1229-1236.Skouteris, G., Hermosilla, D., López, P., Negro, C., Blanco, A. 2012. Anaerobic membranebioreactors for wastewater treatment: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal 198–199(0),138–148.Sørensen, B.L., Sørensen, P.B. 1997. Structure compression in cake filtration. Journal ofEnvironmental Engineering 123, 345-353.Spagni, A., Casu, S., Crispino, N.A., Farina, R., Mattioli., D. 2010. Filterability in a submergedanaerobic membrane bioreactor. Desalination 250, 787-792.Sridang, P.C., Pottier, A., Wisniewski, C., Grasmick, A. 2008. Performance and microbial surveyingin submerged membrane bioreactor for seafood processing wastewater treatment. Journal ofMembrane Science 317, 43–49.Stuckey, D.C., Hu, A. 2003. The submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR): anintensification of anaerobic wastewater treatment. Presented at the International WaterAssociation Leading Edge Conference on Drinking Water and Wastewater TreatmentTechnologies, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.Sun, F.-Y., Wang, X.-M., Li, X.-Y. 2008. Visualisation and characterisation of biopolymer clusters ina submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 325, 691–697.Trzcinski, A.P., Stuckey, D.C. 2009. Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solidwaste in a two-stage membrane process. Water Science and Technology 60(8), 1965-1978.van der Marel, P., Zwijnenburg, A., Kemperman, A., Wessling, M., Temmink, H., van der Meer, W.2009. An improved flux-step method to determine the critical flux and the critical flux forirreversibility in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 332, 24-29.Van Zyl, P. J., Wentzel, M. C., Ekama ,G. A., Riedel, K. J. 2008. Design and start-up of a high rateanaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of a low pH, high strength,dissolved organicwaste water. Water Science and Technology 57(2), 291-296.Wang, X.M., Li, X.Y., Huang, X. 2007. Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor(SMBR): characterisation of the sludge cake and its high filtration resistance. Separation andPurification Technology 52, 439-445.Wang, X.-M., Li, X.-Y. 2008. Accumulation of biopolymer clusters in a submerged membranebioreactor and its effect on membrane fouling. Water Research 42, 855-862.194
Page 3:
UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTE
Page 6 and 7:
padres Macario y Marisa, les agrade
Page 8 and 9:
2.1.2. Nitrogen compounds 662.1.2.1
Page 10:
Chapter 4: Combining UASB and MBR f
Page 14 and 15:
Objetivos y resumenEsta tesis se en
Page 16 and 17:
Objetivos y resumenpermeabilidad de
Page 18 and 19:
Objetivos y resumenuno de los pará
Page 20 and 21:
Objetivos y resumenel sistema propu
Page 22:
Objetivos y resumenconcentraciones
Page 25 and 26:
Obxectivos e resumoauga tratada. O
Page 27 and 28:
Obxectivos e resumoNo Capítulo 3,
Page 29 and 30:
Obxectivos e resumog·L -1 , valore
Page 31 and 32:
Obxectivos e resumoparámetros clav
Page 34 and 35:
Objectives and summaryThis thesis i
Page 36 and 37:
Objectives and summaryOn the basis
Page 38 and 39:
Objectives and summaryfrom the MBR
Page 40 and 41:
Objectives and summaryconsidering t
Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 1IntroductionSummaryIn this
Page 44 and 45:
IntroductionThe combination of memb
Page 46 and 47:
IntroductionThe membranes should ha
Page 48 and 49:
Introductionof water. Energy saving
Page 50 and 51:
number of plants (cum. values)Intro
Page 52 and 53:
IntroductionSubmerged MBR system in
Page 54 and 55:
Introductionchanges of the foulant
Page 56 and 57:
Introductionof 2% NaOH and 0.5% cit
Page 58 and 59:
IntroductionFigure 1.8. Posible rel
Page 60 and 61:
IntroductionSide-stream MBRs involv
Page 62 and 63:
Introductionutilizes the advantages
Page 64 and 65:
Introductionmeans of settlers, of s
Page 66 and 67:
IntroductionUASB, achieving total n
Page 68 and 69:
IntroductionEvenblij, H., van der G
Page 70 and 71:
IntroductionMtinch, E.V., Ban, K.,
Page 72:
IntroductionYang, S., Yang, F., Fu,
Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 22.1. Liquid phaseIn this s
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 2where:M fas: molarity of F
Page 79 and 80:
Acetic Acid (mg·L -1 )Chapter 2VFA
Page 81 and 82:
N-NO 2-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 22.1.2.2.
Page 83 and 84:
N-NO 3-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 2interfer
Page 85 and 86:
P-PO 43-(mg·L -1 )Chapter 2Interfe
Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 2alkalinity (IA), which is
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 22.2.3. Sludge volumetric i
Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 2eq. 2.10eq. 2.11eq. 2.12Th
Page 93 and 94:
Carbohydrate (mg·L -1 )Chapter 2In
Page 95 and 96:
TEP (mgXG·L -1 )Chapter 22.4.4.4.
Page 97 and 98:
Chapter 2Ripley, L.E., Boyle, W.C.,
Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 33.1. IntroductionIn recent
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 3same in both modules; tap
Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 3phases were varied (table
Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 3to time was higher than 10
Page 107 and 108:
COD removal (%)Chapter 3120100Perio
Page 109 and 110:
DTN and N-NH 4+ (mg·L-1 )DTN and N
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 3operated with high MLTSS c
Page 113 and 114:
TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa)TMP (kPa
Page 115 and 116:
SMP carbohydrates (mg·L -1 )Chapte
Page 117 and 118:
Volume (%)Chapter 3Therefore, the c
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 3identical to that of the c
Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 3Massé, A. Spérandio, M.,
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 44.1. IntroductionThe appli
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 4support were added in this
Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 4This cleaning was performe
Page 129 and 130:
COD (mg·L -1 )COD removal (%)OLR (
Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 4the recirculation ratio be
Page 133 and 134:
(mg·L -1 )Chapter 4and ammonium) n
Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 4recirculation from the MBR
Page 137 and 138:
Chapter 4days 57 (period I) and 316
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 4excellent COD removal perf
Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 4Rosenberger, S., Evenblij,
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 55.1. IntroductionAnaerobic
Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 55.3. Material and methods5
Page 147 and 148:
Chapter 5represented an increment o
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 5operating with similar mem
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 5behaviour might be related
Page 153 and 154:
Fouling Rate (Pa·min -1 )Fouling R
Page 155 and 156: Concentration (mg·L -1 )DOC (mg·L
Page 157 and 158: Chapter 5in table 5.3 showed that h
Page 159 and 160: Chapter 5Ho, J., Sung, S. 2010. Met
Page 162 and 163: Chapter 6Denitrification with disso
Page 164 and 165: Denitrification with dissolved meth
Page 174 and 175: (mg·L -1 )Denitrification with dis
Page 176 and 177: DTN effluent (mg·L -1 )CH 4 desorb
Page 186 and 187: Chapter 7Membrane fouling in an AnM
Page 188 and 189: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
Page 194 and 195: OLR and ORR(kgCOD ·m -3·d -1 )pHO
Page 196 and 197: TEP removed (mg·L -1 )OA removed (
Page 198 and 199: R col (m -1 )SRF (m·kg -1 )Membran
Page 200 and 201: BPC, cBPC and TEP concentration(mg
Page 202 and 203: Cake and Colloidal Resistance (m -1
Page 208: Membrane fouling in an AnMBR treati
Page 211 and 212: Conclusionessentido, el uso de una
Page 213 and 214: Conclusionesensuciamiento de la mem
Page 215 and 216: Conclusiónspresenza de soporte de
Page 217 and 218: Conclusións6. Aplicabilidade e per
Page 219 and 220: ConclusionsMoreover, biomass concen
Page 221 and 222: Conclusionstechnology and interesti
Page 223 and 224: List of symbolsHFHRTHyVABHollow Fib
Page 225 and 226: List of symbolsFR/J Normalized Foul
Page 227 and 228: List of publicationsBrand, C., Sán
Page 229: List of publicationsConference on E
show all

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?