13.07.2015 Views

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introductionof 2% NaOH <strong>and</strong> 0.5% citric acid. This kind of cleaning is normally carried out every 1-2months. Maintenance chemical cleaning. Maintenance cleaning is conducted in situ <strong>and</strong> isused to maintain <strong>membrane</strong> permeability <strong>and</strong> helps reduce the frequency of intensivecleaning. Maintenance cleaning is normally carried out moderate reagent concentrations of200-500 mg·L -1 NaOCl <strong>and</strong> a frequency of 1-2 weeks or days for MBRs or TMFapplications, respectively. Alternatively, a low concentration of chemical cleaning agentcan be added to the backwash water to produce a “chemically enhanced backwashing”(CEB) on a daily basis. In the case of TMF applications, CEB is commonly used <strong>with</strong> afrequency of 1-2 hours <strong>and</strong> moderate reagent concentrations of 20-200 mg·L -1 NaOCl(Zheng et al., 2011).Apart from the measures of physical or chemical cleaning, a second strategy can beapplied to limit the consequences of <strong>membrane</strong> fouling, which is to reduce its causes. Thisstrategy is based on modifying the physical <strong>and</strong> chemical nature of the <strong>membrane</strong>, thecomposition of the wastewater <strong>and</strong> the characteristics of mixed liquorThe characteristics of the mixed liquor are the factor on which a major research efforthas been made regarding <strong>membrane</strong> fouling.Membrane fouling in MBRs has been largely attributed to extracellular polymericsubstances (EPS) (Chang <strong>and</strong> Lee, 1998; Cho <strong>and</strong> Fane, 2002; Nagaoka et al., 1996;Nagaoka et al., 1998; Rosenberger <strong>and</strong> Kraume, 2002) <strong>and</strong> soluble microbial products(SMP) (Chang et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2005; Evenblij <strong>and</strong> van der Graaf, 2004; Ji <strong>and</strong> Zhou,2006) althought SMP have been reported to have a greater impact on <strong>membrane</strong> foulingas will be mentioned later.EPS consist of insoluble materials (sheaths, capsular polymers, condensed gel,loosely bound polymers <strong>and</strong> attached organic material) secreted by the cell, shed from thecell surface or generated by cell lysis (Jang et al., 2005). On the other h<strong>and</strong> SMP aredefined as the pool of organic compounds that are released into solution from substratemetabolism (usually <strong>with</strong> biomass growth) <strong>and</strong> biomass decay (Barker <strong>and</strong> Stuckey, 1999).The EPS or SMP are constituted by proteins, polysaccharides, nucleic acids, lipids, <strong>and</strong>humic acids.A number of different studies have indicated a direct relationship between thecarbohydrate level in SMP fraction <strong>and</strong> MBR <strong>membrane</strong> fouling (Lesjean et al., 2005; Le-Clech et al., 2005; Rosenberger et al., 2005). The hydrophilic nature of carbohydrate mayexplain the apparently higher fouling propensity of this fraction over that of proteins, given43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!