13.07.2015 Views

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

Combining submerged membrane technology with anaerobic and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6where subindex i correspond to each component (nitrogen anions, oxygen <strong>and</strong>methane) of the mass balance, Q IN,i is the input flow [L·d -1 ], C 0i is the input concentration[mg·L -1 ], Q OUT, is the output flow from the first (anoxic) chamber [L·d -1 ], C i is the outputconcentration [mg·L -1 ], V is the volume of the first (anoxic) chamber [L], r i is the volumetricreaction rate [mg·L -1·d -1 ], C i*is the concentration of either methane or oxygen in equilibrium<strong>with</strong> air [mg·L -1 ] <strong>and</strong> k La i is the mass transfer coefficient for either methane or oxygen. Thelast term of equation 6 was not taken into account for nitrogen ions mass balance.Operational data was grouped depending on the recirculation ratio. Average valuesof dissolved methane concentration (input <strong>and</strong> output), dissolved oxygen concentration(input <strong>and</strong> output) <strong>and</strong> nitrogen anions concentration (input <strong>and</strong> output) were calculatedfrom experimental data for each one of the recirculation scenarios. Dissolved methaneinput was due to the UASB effluent whereas nitrogen anions <strong>and</strong> dissolved oxygenentered the first chamber through the recirculation from the aerobic <strong>membrane</strong> filtrationchamber. Desorbed methane from the first chamber <strong>and</strong> oxygen input due to oxygentransferred from the surface air to this chamber were calculated according to section 2.4.6.4. Results <strong>and</strong> discussion6.4.1. General resultsThe system was operated at ambient temperature, <strong>and</strong> wastewater temperatureschanged <strong>with</strong> seasons (21.5 – 19.0 °C). Despite operating in psychrophilic conditionsvolatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration in the UASB effluent was below minimum detectionlimit of the method used (20 mg·L -1 ) during the six experimental periods. Biogas productionin the UASB reactor was detected during the six experimental periods, <strong>with</strong> an averageproduction rate of 50.9±10.8 L·d -1 , depending on OLR applied. Biogas production yieldwas around 0.15 m³ methane·kgCOD eliminated-1. Methane reached more than 70% of the biogascomposition during the whole operation. Methane in the biogas correspondedapproximately to the 75% of the total methane produced. Therefore, up to 25 % of themethane produced in the <strong>anaerobic</strong> reactor would be dissolved in the effluent, whichconfirmed the values reported by previous studies (Noyola et al., 2006; Souza et al. 2011).The system treated an average of 280 L·d -1 of wastewater <strong>with</strong> a total CODconcentration in the feeding varying between 800 <strong>and</strong> 1300 mg·L -1 . The concentration oftotal COD in the permeate of the MBR was normally lower than 20 mg·L -1 . Therefore CODremovals achieved in the system were above 97.5%. The average organic loading rate(OLR) applied to the UASB reactor was between 1.7 <strong>and</strong> 2.8 kgCOD·m -3·d -1 . With respect158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!