Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Key efficiency<br />
indicators<br />
Average cost<br />
per day per<br />
maritime<br />
infrastructure<br />
asset managed.<br />
Key efficiency<br />
indicators<br />
Average survey<br />
cost per<br />
commercial<br />
vessel.<br />
Key efficiency<br />
indicators<br />
Average cost<br />
per private<br />
recreational<br />
vessel<br />
registration.<br />
2007-08<br />
actual<br />
2008-09<br />
actual<br />
2009-10<br />
actual<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
target<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
actual<br />
$61.17 $63.34 $69.61 $63.07 $58.28<br />
2007-08<br />
actual<br />
2008-09<br />
actual<br />
2009-10<br />
actual<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
target<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
actual<br />
$2,124 $2,749 $2,662 $3,210 $2,429<br />
2007-08<br />
actual<br />
2008-09<br />
actual<br />
2009-10<br />
actual<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
target<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
actual<br />
$59.99 $79.83 $93.87 $104.01 $113.26<br />
Reasons for significant<br />
variance<br />
The 2009-10 actual<br />
included costs associated<br />
with the functional transfer<br />
<strong>of</strong> coastal infrastructure<br />
from DPI to the DoT.<br />
Reasons for significant<br />
variance<br />
The variation between the<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11 budget target and<br />
the <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual was<br />
due to lower staffing costs<br />
attributable to a lower<br />
than expected number<br />
<strong>of</strong> surveyed vessels and<br />
improved data collection<br />
for regional services and<br />
corporate overhead costs<br />
resulting in a more accurate<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> costs.<br />
Reasons for significant<br />
variance<br />
New costing models<br />
developed for the DoT have<br />
more accurately identified<br />
Marine Safety’s costs<br />
across the regions that align<br />
directly to this service. This<br />
along with an unanticipated<br />
drop in the estimated<br />
number <strong>of</strong> recreational boat<br />
registrations combined to<br />
increase the actual cost per<br />
vessel.<br />
Key efficiency<br />
indicators<br />
Cost to maintain<br />
marine pollution<br />
response<br />
preparedness<br />
per registered<br />
vessel.<br />
Key efficiency<br />
indicators<br />
Average cost<br />
per household<br />
contacted<br />
under the<br />
‘TravelSmart’<br />
scheme.<br />
2007-08<br />
actual<br />
2008-09<br />
actual<br />
2009-10<br />
actual<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
target<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
actual<br />
$48.01 $35.40 $34.96 $29.08 $24.48<br />
2007-08<br />
actual<br />
2008-09<br />
actual<br />
2009-10<br />
actual<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
target<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
actual<br />
$105.98 $219.47 $204.21 $335.51 $182.42<br />
Reasons for significant<br />
variance<br />
The <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual is<br />
lower than both the<br />
2009-10 actual and the<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11 budget due to<br />
the original estimate<br />
including additional costs<br />
<strong>of</strong> $250,000 for oil spill<br />
mapping, which did not<br />
eventuate.<br />
Reasons for significant<br />
variance<br />
The method to calculate the<br />
KPI has been changed to<br />
include only the nett cost<br />
to the State Government,<br />
excluding grants received<br />
during <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />
The <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual is below<br />
the <strong>2010</strong>-11 budget target<br />
because the grant was<br />
secured after the KPI target<br />
was established and the<br />
program scale was doubled<br />
(from 5,000 to 10,000<br />
households) at no extra<br />
cost. The cost effectiveness<br />
improved as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
grant income.<br />
101