05.12.2012 Views

Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011

Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011

Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36. Explanatory Statement (continued)<br />

(ii) Significant variations between actuals for <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong> – Total appropriation to<br />

deliver services (continued)<br />

(c) Service expenditure<br />

80<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system planning and regulation<br />

The variation is primarily due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

133 138 118 802 14 336<br />

• Esperance Lead and Nickel Clean up. 12 646<br />

• Enhanced Central Area Transit service. 3 763<br />

• Increase in Grain Freight Transitional<br />

Assistance Program (compared to 2009-10).<br />

1 243<br />

• Implementation <strong>of</strong> Milligan Street Taxi Rank<br />

Security Initiatives.<br />

1 109<br />

These increases are mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Reduction in cost associated with the<br />

Regional Airport Development Scheme<br />

(compared to 2009-10) mainly due to deferral<br />

<strong>of</strong> cost to <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />

following the transfer <strong>of</strong> function to<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />

Motor vehicle registration and driver<br />

licensing services<br />

The variation is primarily due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Increase in the Country Age Fuel Card<br />

Subsidy administered on behalf <strong>of</strong> Royalties<br />

for Regions.<br />

This increase is mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />

following the transfer <strong>of</strong> function to the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />

(3 299)<br />

(1 133)<br />

151 063 144 552 6 511<br />

9 480<br />

(3 639)<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

The variation is mainly due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

10 621 6 793 3 828<br />

• Cost associated with the transfer <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

function from Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority to<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> it together with<br />

increased level <strong>of</strong> activity.<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> planning<br />

The variation is primarily due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

13 316 10 026 3 290<br />

• Increased planning activity associated with<br />

regional and metropolitan freight and people<br />

movement planning and the public transport<br />

plan.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!