Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36. Explanatory Statement (continued)<br />
(ii) Significant variations between actuals for <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong> – Total appropriation to<br />
deliver services (continued)<br />
(c) Service expenditure<br />
80<br />
<strong>2011</strong><br />
Actual<br />
$ 000<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Actual<br />
$ 000<br />
Variance<br />
$ 000<br />
<strong>Transport</strong> system planning and regulation<br />
The variation is primarily due to additional<br />
expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />
133 138 118 802 14 336<br />
• Esperance Lead and Nickel Clean up. 12 646<br />
• Enhanced Central Area Transit service. 3 763<br />
• Increase in Grain Freight Transitional<br />
Assistance Program (compared to 2009-10).<br />
1 243<br />
• Implementation <strong>of</strong> Milligan Street Taxi Rank<br />
Security Initiatives.<br />
1 109<br />
These increases are mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />
• Reduction in cost associated with the<br />
Regional Airport Development Scheme<br />
(compared to 2009-10) mainly due to deferral<br />
<strong>of</strong> cost to <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />
• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />
following the transfer <strong>of</strong> function to<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />
Motor vehicle registration and driver<br />
licensing services<br />
The variation is primarily due to additional<br />
expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />
• Increase in the Country Age Fuel Card<br />
Subsidy administered on behalf <strong>of</strong> Royalties<br />
for Regions.<br />
This increase is mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />
• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />
following the transfer <strong>of</strong> function to the<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />
(3 299)<br />
(1 133)<br />
151 063 144 552 6 511<br />
9 480<br />
(3 639)<br />
<strong>2011</strong><br />
Actual<br />
$ 000<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
Actual<br />
$ 000<br />
Variance<br />
$ 000<br />
Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />
The variation is mainly due to additional<br />
expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />
10 621 6 793 3 828<br />
• Cost associated with the transfer <strong>of</strong> policy<br />
function from Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority to<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> it together with<br />
increased level <strong>of</strong> activity.<br />
Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> planning<br />
The variation is primarily due to additional<br />
expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />
13 316 10 026 3 290<br />
• Increased planning activity associated with<br />
regional and metropolitan freight and people<br />
movement planning and the public transport<br />
plan.