Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Financial targets:<br />
Actuals compared to budget targets<br />
The following table provides a comparison <strong>of</strong> the financial targets and outcomes<br />
against criteria included in the Resource Agreement between the Chief Executive<br />
Officer, the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> and the Treasurer.<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
Target<br />
$’000<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />
Actual<br />
$’000<br />
Variation<br />
$’000<br />
Total costs <strong>of</strong> services 312,981 308,138 4,843 Note 1<br />
Net cost <strong>of</strong> services 126,294 125,094 1,200 Note 2<br />
Total equity 498,414 503,696 5,282 Note 3<br />
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held 10,818 20,887 10,069 Note 4<br />
Approved full time equivalent 1,306 1,304 2<br />
Notes<br />
These notes should be read in conjunction with the Explanatory Statement to the<br />
Financial Statements.<br />
Note 1: Total cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />
The variation is primarily due to: $Million<br />
North West Shipping Subsidy (5.4)<br />
Recreational Boat Facilities (3.3)<br />
Regional Airport Development Scheme (3.1)<br />
Grain Freight Subsidy (2.2)<br />
Taxi User Subsidy Scheme 2.2<br />
Operational costs 7.1<br />
Note 2: Net cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />
The variation is primarily due to a $4.8 million decrease in expenses partly <strong>of</strong>fset by<br />
a $3.6 million decrease in revenue.<br />
Note 3: Total equity<br />
The variation is primarily due to an increase in the asset revaluation reserve.<br />
Note 4: Net increase in cash held<br />
The variation is primarily due to the deferral <strong>of</strong> expenditure on capital projects in<br />
<strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />
31