06.12.2012 Views

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

temperature than are the biophysically controlled<br />

light-harvesting reactions. Carbon<br />

fixation reactions therefore tend to limit photosynthesis<br />

at low temperature. Plants adapted<br />

to cold climates compensate for this by producing<br />

leaves with high concentrations <strong>of</strong> leaf<br />

nitrogen and photosynthetic enzymes, which<br />

enable carboxylation to keep pace with the<br />

energy supply from the light-harvesting reactions<br />

(Berry and Björkman 1980). This explains<br />

why arctic and alpine plants typically have<br />

high leaf nitrogen concentrations despite low<br />

soil nitrogen availability (Körner and Larcher<br />

1988). Plants in cold environments also have<br />

hairs and other morphological traits that<br />

raise leaf temperature above air temperature<br />

(Körner 1999). In hot environments with an<br />

adequate water supply, plants produce leaves<br />

with high photosynthetic rates. The associated<br />

high transpiration rate can cool the leaf, so leaf<br />

temperatures are much lower than air temperatures.<br />

In hot, dry environments, plants close<br />

stomata to conserve water, and the cooling<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> transpiration is reduced. Plants in<br />

these environments <strong>of</strong>ten produce small leaves<br />

that shed heat effectively and maintain temperatures<br />

close to air temperature (see Chapter<br />

4). In summary, despite the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis<br />

to short-term variation in temperature,<br />

leaf properties minimize the differences in<br />

leaf temperature among <strong>ecosystem</strong>s, and plants<br />

acclimate and adapt so there is no clear relationship<br />

between temperature and average<br />

photosynthetic rate in the field, when <strong>ecosystem</strong>s<br />

are compared.<br />

Pollutants<br />

Pollutants reduce carbon gain primarily by<br />

reducing leaf area or photosynthetic capacity.<br />

Many pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2)<br />

and ozone, reduce photosynthesis through their<br />

effects on growth and the production <strong>of</strong> leaf<br />

area. Pollutants also directly reduce photosynthesis<br />

by entering the stomata and damaging<br />

the photosynthetic machinery, thereby reducing<br />

photosynthetic capacity (Winner et al.<br />

1985). Plants then reduce stomatal conductance<br />

to balance CO2 uptake with the reduced capacity<br />

for carbon fixation.This reduces the entry <strong>of</strong><br />

Gross Primary Production 115<br />

pollutants into the leaf, reducing the vulnerability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the leaf to further injury. Plants<br />

growing in low-fertility or dry conditions are<br />

preadapted to pollutant stress because their<br />

low stomatal conductance minimizes the quantity<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollutants entering leaves. These plants<br />

are therefore less affected by pollutants than<br />

are rapidly growing crops and other plants with<br />

high stomatal conductance.<br />

Gross Primary Production<br />

Gross primary production is the sum <strong>of</strong> the<br />

photosynthesis by all leaves measured at the<br />

<strong>ecosystem</strong> scale. It is typically integrated over<br />

time periods <strong>of</strong> days to a year (gCm -2 <strong>of</strong><br />

ground yr -1 ) and is the process by which carbon<br />

and energy enter <strong>ecosystem</strong>s. GPP is generally<br />

estimated from simulation models rather than<br />

measured directly, because it is impossible to<br />

measure the net carbon exchange <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

leaves in the canopy in isolation from other<br />

<strong>ecosystem</strong> components (e.g., respiration by<br />

stems and soil) and without modifying the vertical<br />

gradient in environment. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

these modeling studies suggest that most conclusions<br />

derived from leaf-level measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> net photosynthesis can be extended to the<br />

<strong>ecosystem</strong> scale, when the vertical pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong><br />

photosynthetic capacity and environment are<br />

considered. Measurement <strong>of</strong> whole-<strong>ecosystem</strong><br />

carbon exchange provides another way to estimate<br />

GPP (see Chapter 6).<br />

Canopy Processes<br />

The vertical pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> leaf photosynthetic<br />

properties in a canopy maximizes GPP. In most<br />

closed-canopy <strong>ecosystem</strong>s, photosynthetic<br />

capacity decreases exponentially through the<br />

canopy in parallel with the exponential decline<br />

in irradiance (Eq. 5.1) (Hirose and Werger<br />

1987).This matching <strong>of</strong> photosynthetic capacity<br />

to light availability is the response we would<br />

expect from individual leaves within the<br />

canopy, because it maintains the co-limitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> photosynthesis by diffusion and biochemical<br />

processes in each leaf. It also serves to maximize<br />

GPP in closed-canopy <strong>ecosystem</strong>s. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!