Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf
Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf
Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
180 8. Terrestrial Plant Nutrient Use<br />
tically through the soil by saturated flow whenever<br />
the water content exceeds the soil’s waterholding<br />
capacity. Because nutrient availability<br />
and mineralization rates are generally highest<br />
in the uppermost soils, this vertical flow <strong>of</strong><br />
water redistributes nutrients and replenishes<br />
diffusion shells surrounding roots. Both root<br />
growth and vertical soil water movement occur<br />
preferentially in soil cracks, quickly eliminating<br />
diffusion shells around these roots. Saturated<br />
flow is also important in <strong>ecosystem</strong>s where<br />
there is regular horizontal flow <strong>of</strong> ground water<br />
across an impermeable soil layer. Deep-rooted<br />
species in tundra underlain by permafrost, for<br />
example, have 10-fold greater nutrient uptake<br />
and productivity in areas <strong>of</strong> rapid subsurface<br />
flow than in areas without lateral groundwater<br />
flow (Chapin et al. 1988). The high productivity<br />
<strong>of</strong> trees and shrubs in riparian <strong>ecosystem</strong>s<br />
results in part because their roots <strong>of</strong>ten extend<br />
to the water table and to groundwater beneath<br />
the stream (the hyporrheic zone), where roots<br />
tap the saturated flow <strong>of</strong> nutrients through the<br />
rooting zone.<br />
Root Interception<br />
Root interception is not an important mechanism<br />
for directly supplying nutrients to roots.<br />
As roots elongate into new soil, they intercept<br />
available nutrients in this unoccupied soil.<br />
The quantity <strong>of</strong> available nitrogen, phosphorus,<br />
and potassium per unit soil volume is, however,<br />
always less than the quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients<br />
required to construct the root, so root interception<br />
can never be an important mechanism<br />
<strong>of</strong> nutrient supply to the shoot. Root growth is<br />
critical, not because it intercepts nutrients, but<br />
because it explores new soil volume and creates<br />
new root surface to which nutrients can move<br />
by diffusion and mass flow.<br />
Nutrient Uptake<br />
Nutrient uptake. Who is in charge? Three<br />
factors govern nutrient uptake by vegetation:<br />
nutrient supply rate from the soil, root length,<br />
and root activity. Just as with photosynthesis,<br />
several factors influence nutrient uptake at<br />
the <strong>ecosystem</strong> scale. Our main conclusions in<br />
this section are as follows: (1) Nutrient supply<br />
rate is the major factor accounting for differences<br />
among <strong>ecosystem</strong>s in nutrient uptake<br />
at steady state. In other words, nutrient supply<br />
by the soil rather than plant traits determines<br />
biome differences in nutrient uptake by<br />
vegetation. (2) Plant traits such as root length<br />
and root activity strongly influence total nutrient<br />
uptake by vegetation in <strong>ecosystem</strong>s in<br />
which biomass is increasing rapidly after disturbance.<br />
(3) Root length is the major factor<br />
governing which plants in an <strong>ecosystem</strong> are<br />
most successful in competing for a limited<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />
Nutrient Supply<br />
Nutrient uptake by vegetation at steady state is<br />
driven primarily by nutrient supply. There are<br />
unresolved debates about the relative importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil and plant characteristics in determining<br />
stand-level rates <strong>of</strong> nutrient absorption.<br />
There are several lines <strong>of</strong> evidence, however,<br />
suggesting that nutrient supply exerts primary<br />
control over nutrient uptake by vegetation at<br />
steady state. The most direct evidence for the<br />
controlling role <strong>of</strong> nutrient supply in driving<br />
uptake by vegetation is that most <strong>ecosystem</strong>s<br />
respond to nutrient addition with increased<br />
uptake and net primary production (NPP) (Fig.<br />
8.1). This differs strikingly from the controls<br />
over photosynthesis, where <strong>ecosystem</strong> differences<br />
in carbon uptake are determined<br />
primarily by capacity <strong>of</strong> vegetation to acquire<br />
carbon (leaf area and photosynthetic capacity),<br />
rather than by the supplies <strong>of</strong> CO2 or light<br />
(see Chapter 5).<br />
Simulation models support the conclusion<br />
that plant uptake is more sensitive to nutrient<br />
supply and to the volume <strong>of</strong> soil exploited by<br />
roots than to the kinetics <strong>of</strong> nutrient uptake,<br />
particularly for immobile ions like phosphate.<br />
At low nutrient supply rates, for example,<br />
variation in factors affecting diffusion (diffusion<br />
coefficient and buffering capacity) and<br />
root length (elongation rate) have a much<br />
greater effect on nutrient uptake than do<br />
kinetics (maximum and minimum capacity for