06.12.2012 Views

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

specialization might increase the efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

resource use by the community if some species<br />

use resources that would otherwise not be<br />

tapped by other species.<br />

In experimental grassland communities, for<br />

example, plots that were planted with a larger<br />

number <strong>of</strong> species had greater plant cover and<br />

lower concentrations <strong>of</strong> inorganic soil nitrogen<br />

than did low-diversity plots (Fig. 12.8) (Tilman<br />

et al. 1996). The more diverse plots might use<br />

more resources because species have complementary<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> resource use; in other<br />

words, species might differ in the types <strong>of</strong><br />

resources, the location <strong>of</strong> their roots, or their<br />

timing <strong>of</strong> uptake. Alternatively, diverse plots<br />

might use resources more effectively because<br />

they are more likely to have a species that is<br />

highly effective in capturing resources<br />

(sampling effect) or are more likely to include<br />

species with complementary patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

resource use (Hooper et al., in press). In other<br />

cases, low-diversity <strong>ecosystem</strong>s are quite efficient<br />

in using soil resources. Crop or forest<br />

monocultures, for example, are <strong>of</strong>ten just as<br />

productive as mixed cropping systems<br />

(Vandermeer 1995) and mixed-species forest<br />

stands (Rodin and Bazilevich 1967). Although<br />

there are many examples <strong>of</strong> a positive relationship<br />

between species number and productivity<br />

or efficiency <strong>of</strong> resource use, this does not<br />

always occur. The effect <strong>of</strong> species richness<br />

Nitrate in rooting zone (mg kg -1 )<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

5 10 15 20 25<br />

Species richness treatment<br />

Figure 12.8. Effect <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />

sown on a plot on the nitrate concentration in the<br />

rooting zone. Measurements were made 3 years after<br />

the plots were sown. Data are means ± SE. (Redrawn<br />

with permission from Nature; Tilman et al. 1996.)<br />

Diversity Effects on Ecosystem Processes 275<br />

frequently saturates at a much lower number <strong>of</strong><br />

species (5 to 10) than characterize most natural<br />

communities. Determining the circumstances<br />

and mechanisms in which species number influences<br />

<strong>ecosystem</strong> processes is an active area <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>ecosystem</strong> research (Hooper et al., in press).<br />

Diversity <strong>of</strong> functionally similar species<br />

stabilizes <strong>ecosystem</strong> processes in the face <strong>of</strong><br />

temporal variation in environment. In <strong>ecosystem</strong>s<br />

in which functionally similar species<br />

differ in environmental response, this can<br />

buffer <strong>ecosystem</strong> processes from environmental<br />

fluctuations (McNaughton 1977, Chapin and<br />

Shaver 1985).Tropical tree species, for example,<br />

differ subtly in their growth response to nutrients<br />

(Fig. 12.9). Conditions that favor some<br />

species will likely reduce the competitive<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> other functionally similar species,<br />

thus stabilizing the total biomass or activity by<br />

the entire community. In other words, in compensation<br />

for the reduced growth by some<br />

species, other species grow more. For example,<br />

in one study, annual variation in weather caused<br />

at least a tw<strong>of</strong>old variation production by each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the major vascular plant species in arctic<br />

tussock tundra. Years that were favorable for<br />

some species, however, reduced the productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> others, so there was no significant difference<br />

in productivity at the <strong>ecosystem</strong> scale<br />

among the 5 years examined (Chapin and Shaver<br />

1985). Directional changes in environment can<br />

also cause less change in total biomass than in<br />

the biomass <strong>of</strong> individual species for similar<br />

reasons; some species respond positively to the<br />

change in environment, whereas other species<br />

respond negatively. This stabilization <strong>of</strong> biomass<br />

and production by diversity has been observed<br />

in many (but not all) studies (Cottingham et al.<br />

2001), including grasslands, in response to the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> water and nutrients (Lauenroth<br />

et al. 1978) and to grazing (McNaughton 1977);<br />

in tundra, in response to changes in temperature,<br />

light, and nutrients (Chapin and Shaver<br />

1985); and in lakes, in response to acidification<br />

(Frost et al. 1995). This stability <strong>of</strong> processes<br />

provided by diversity has societal relevance.<br />

Many traditional farmers plant diverse crops,<br />

not to maximize productivity in a given year but<br />

to decrease the chances <strong>of</strong> crop failure in a bad<br />

year (Altieri 1990). Even the loss <strong>of</strong> rare species

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!