Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf
Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf
Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116 5. Carbon Input to Terrestrial Ecosystems<br />
matching <strong>of</strong> photosynthetic capacity to light<br />
availability occurs through the preferential<br />
transfer <strong>of</strong> nitrogen to leaves at the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canopy. At least three processes cause this to<br />
happen. (1) Sun leaves at the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy<br />
develop more cell layers than shade leaves and<br />
therefore contain more nitrogen per unit leaf<br />
area. (2) New leaves are produced primarily at<br />
the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy, causing nitrogen to be<br />
transported to the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy (Field<br />
1983, Hirose and Werger 1987). (3) Leaves at<br />
the bottom <strong>of</strong> the canopy senesce when they<br />
become shaded below their light compensation<br />
point. Much <strong>of</strong> the nitrogen resorbed from<br />
these senescing leaves (see Chapter 8) is transported<br />
to the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy to support the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> young leaves with high photosynthetic<br />
capacity. The accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />
nitrogen at the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy is most pronounced<br />
in dense canopies, which develop<br />
under circumstances <strong>of</strong> high water and nitrogen<br />
availability (Field 1991). In environments in<br />
which leaf area is limited by water, nitrogen, or<br />
time since disturbance, there is less advantage<br />
to concentrating nitrogen at the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canopy, because light is abundant throughout<br />
the canopy. In these canopies, light availability,<br />
nitrogen concentrations, and photosynthetic<br />
rates are more uniformly distributed through<br />
the canopy.<br />
Canopy-scale relationships between light<br />
and nitrogen appear to occur even in multispecies<br />
communities. In a single individual,<br />
there is an obvious selective advantage to optimizing<br />
nitrogen distribution within the canopy<br />
because this provides the greatest carbon<br />
return per unit <strong>of</strong> nitrogen invested in leaves.<br />
We know less about the factors governing<br />
carbon gain in multispecies stands. In such<br />
stands, the individuals at the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy<br />
account for most <strong>of</strong> the photosynthesis and may<br />
be able to support greater root biomass to<br />
acquire more nitrogen, compared to smaller<br />
subcanopy or understory individuals (Hikosaka<br />
and Hirose 2001). This specialization among<br />
individuals probably contributes to the vertical<br />
scaling <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and photosynthesis that is<br />
observed in multispecies stands.<br />
Vertical gradients in other environmental<br />
variables <strong>of</strong>ten reinforce the maximization <strong>of</strong><br />
carbon gain near the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy. The<br />
canopy modifies not only light availability<br />
but also other variables that influence photosynthetic<br />
rate, including wind speed, temperature,<br />
relative humidity, and CO2 concentration<br />
(Fig. 5.16). The most important <strong>of</strong> these effects<br />
is the decrease in wind speed from the<br />
free atmosphere to the ground surface. The<br />
friction <strong>of</strong> air moving across Earth’s surface<br />
causes wind speed to decrease exponentially<br />
from the free atmosphere to the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canopy. In other words, Earth’s surface creates<br />
a boundary layer similar to that which develops<br />
around individual leaves (Fig. 5.4). Wind speed<br />
continues to decrease from the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
canopy to the ground surface in ways that<br />
depend on canopy structure. Smooth canopies,<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> crops or grasslands, show a<br />
gradual decrease in wind speed from the top <strong>of</strong><br />
the canopy to the ground surface, whereas<br />
rough canopies, characteristic <strong>of</strong> many forests,<br />
create more friction and turbulence, which<br />
increase the vertical mixing <strong>of</strong> air within the<br />
canopy (see Chapter 4) (McNaughton and<br />
Jarvis 1991). For this reason, gas exchange in<br />
rough canopies is more tightly coupled to conditions<br />
in the free atmosphere than in smooth<br />
canopies.<br />
Tree height<br />
Leaf area<br />
Temperature<br />
1 o C 0.1 kPa 1 m s -1<br />
Vapor pressure<br />
Figure 5.16. Typical vertical gradients in temperature,<br />
vapor pressure, and wind speed in a forest.<br />
Temperature is highest in the midcanopy where<br />
most energy is absorbed. The increase in wind speed<br />
at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the canopy occurs in open forests,<br />
where there is little understory. (Redrawn with<br />
permission from Academic Press; Landsberg and<br />
Gower 1997.)<br />
Wind speed