06.12.2012 Views

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 5. Carbon Input to Terrestrial Ecosystems<br />

matching <strong>of</strong> photosynthetic capacity to light<br />

availability occurs through the preferential<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> nitrogen to leaves at the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

canopy. At least three processes cause this to<br />

happen. (1) Sun leaves at the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy<br />

develop more cell layers than shade leaves and<br />

therefore contain more nitrogen per unit leaf<br />

area. (2) New leaves are produced primarily at<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy, causing nitrogen to be<br />

transported to the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy (Field<br />

1983, Hirose and Werger 1987). (3) Leaves at<br />

the bottom <strong>of</strong> the canopy senesce when they<br />

become shaded below their light compensation<br />

point. Much <strong>of</strong> the nitrogen resorbed from<br />

these senescing leaves (see Chapter 8) is transported<br />

to the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy to support the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> young leaves with high photosynthetic<br />

capacity. The accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

nitrogen at the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy is most pronounced<br />

in dense canopies, which develop<br />

under circumstances <strong>of</strong> high water and nitrogen<br />

availability (Field 1991). In environments in<br />

which leaf area is limited by water, nitrogen, or<br />

time since disturbance, there is less advantage<br />

to concentrating nitrogen at the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

canopy, because light is abundant throughout<br />

the canopy. In these canopies, light availability,<br />

nitrogen concentrations, and photosynthetic<br />

rates are more uniformly distributed through<br />

the canopy.<br />

Canopy-scale relationships between light<br />

and nitrogen appear to occur even in multispecies<br />

communities. In a single individual,<br />

there is an obvious selective advantage to optimizing<br />

nitrogen distribution within the canopy<br />

because this provides the greatest carbon<br />

return per unit <strong>of</strong> nitrogen invested in leaves.<br />

We know less about the factors governing<br />

carbon gain in multispecies stands. In such<br />

stands, the individuals at the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy<br />

account for most <strong>of</strong> the photosynthesis and may<br />

be able to support greater root biomass to<br />

acquire more nitrogen, compared to smaller<br />

subcanopy or understory individuals (Hikosaka<br />

and Hirose 2001). This specialization among<br />

individuals probably contributes to the vertical<br />

scaling <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and photosynthesis that is<br />

observed in multispecies stands.<br />

Vertical gradients in other environmental<br />

variables <strong>of</strong>ten reinforce the maximization <strong>of</strong><br />

carbon gain near the top <strong>of</strong> the canopy. The<br />

canopy modifies not only light availability<br />

but also other variables that influence photosynthetic<br />

rate, including wind speed, temperature,<br />

relative humidity, and CO2 concentration<br />

(Fig. 5.16). The most important <strong>of</strong> these effects<br />

is the decrease in wind speed from the<br />

free atmosphere to the ground surface. The<br />

friction <strong>of</strong> air moving across Earth’s surface<br />

causes wind speed to decrease exponentially<br />

from the free atmosphere to the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

canopy. In other words, Earth’s surface creates<br />

a boundary layer similar to that which develops<br />

around individual leaves (Fig. 5.4). Wind speed<br />

continues to decrease from the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

canopy to the ground surface in ways that<br />

depend on canopy structure. Smooth canopies,<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> crops or grasslands, show a<br />

gradual decrease in wind speed from the top <strong>of</strong><br />

the canopy to the ground surface, whereas<br />

rough canopies, characteristic <strong>of</strong> many forests,<br />

create more friction and turbulence, which<br />

increase the vertical mixing <strong>of</strong> air within the<br />

canopy (see Chapter 4) (McNaughton and<br />

Jarvis 1991). For this reason, gas exchange in<br />

rough canopies is more tightly coupled to conditions<br />

in the free atmosphere than in smooth<br />

canopies.<br />

Tree height<br />

Leaf area<br />

Temperature<br />

1 o C 0.1 kPa 1 m s -1<br />

Vapor pressure<br />

Figure 5.16. Typical vertical gradients in temperature,<br />

vapor pressure, and wind speed in a forest.<br />

Temperature is highest in the midcanopy where<br />

most energy is absorbed. The increase in wind speed<br />

at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the canopy occurs in open forests,<br />

where there is little understory. (Redrawn with<br />

permission from Academic Press; Landsberg and<br />

Gower 1997.)<br />

Wind speed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!