10.09.2015 Views

ARTIFICIAL HELLS

1EOfZcf

1EOfZcf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

former west<br />

In tracing the re- emergence of a social turn in Europe, 1993 is a key<br />

transitional year. Until that point, artist collectives had been a predominantly<br />

North American phenomenon, and activist in orientation, as a<br />

result of the AIDS crisis and ensuing ‘culture wars’ over NEA funding. In<br />

1993 we begin to see the formation of Northern European collectives such<br />

as Superflex (1993), N55 (1994) and Park Fiction (1994). It is telling that<br />

this collectively driven work derives from site- specific practice rather than<br />

from theatre and performance, as has tended to be the case in previous<br />

chapters. This year, 1993, also marks the consolidation of a new type of<br />

site- specific exhibition that would become an important reference point<br />

for the emerging globalised contemporary art biennial: exhibitions that<br />

directly addressed site as a socially constituted phenomenon, rather than as<br />

a formal or phenomenological entity. This is in contrast to previous types<br />

of site- specific curating, such as ‘Sculpture Projects Münster’ (1987) and<br />

‘Places with a Past: New Site- Specific Art at Charleston’s Spoleto Festival’<br />

(1991), both of which used site as an evocative formal backdrop for<br />

work imbued with historical resonance. To examine this shift I will look<br />

at three exhibitions that mark a transition from site- specificity as a matter<br />

of tailored formal arrangement to the project of embedding the artist in<br />

the social field. 6<br />

I. ‘Project Unité’, ‘Sonsbeek 93’ and ‘Culture in Action’<br />

In Europe, two exhibitions paved the way for the shift described above:<br />

Kasper König’s outdoor sculpture show ‘Sculpture Projects Münster’<br />

(1987), and Jan Hoet’s ‘Chambres d’Amis’ (1986), an experimental exhibition<br />

in which (mainly male and European) artists were invited to create<br />

installations in over fifty private homes in Ghent. Although viewing the<br />

works in ‘Chambres d’Amis’ inevitably involved liaising with the owners<br />

of each residence, this was not understood to be the exhibition’s primary<br />

goal. 7 Any social benefits were collateral rather than intentional: ‘Chambres<br />

d’Amis’ was, Hoet notes, an opportunity ‘for a fertile aesthetic dialogue<br />

between different cultures’, and led to ‘warm and cordial contacts, not only<br />

between artists and hosts, but also between occupiers and visitors’. 8 Most of<br />

the works comprised formal and atmospheric reconfigurations of domestic<br />

space, rather than dealing with class or identity; the one exception to this<br />

was the Belgian artist Jef Geys, who placed French revolutionary slogans<br />

on the doors of six lower- income households. 9<br />

The artist Christian Philipp Müller saw ‘Chambres d’Amis’ while working<br />

with König on the 1987 edition of Münster. Three years later, Müller<br />

was invited by the French curator Yves Aupetitallot to have a solo exhibition<br />

in Saint Etienne, and while preparing the show decided to visit a<br />

housing estate by Le Corbusier in the nearby town of Firminy. Modelled<br />

on the Unité d’Habitation in Marseille, the estate in Firminy was in a<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!