10.09.2015 Views

ARTIFICIAL HELLS

1EOfZcf

1EOfZcf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

notes to pages 146– 7<br />

suspect of having any value’ (my translation). Mlynárčik had used this<br />

technique in Edgar Degas’ Memorial, asking Restany to secure works of<br />

art from Nouveaux Réalistes as donations to the festival, which were then<br />

auctioned off to provide cash prizes for the horse- racing competition.<br />

50 Mlynárčik, cited in Restany, Ailleurs, p. 123.<br />

51 As reported by Restany, ‘De Varsovie, Žilina, Prague, avec Amour’, p. 56.<br />

52 With the advent of communism, ‘individual property rights were decimated.<br />

Still, when compared to the situation in the mid- 1940s, in some<br />

ways the economic situation for ordinary persons improved. The rural<br />

regions of Slovakia, in particular, benefited. In order to supplement their<br />

incomes, farmers, who lost their lands to collectivisation and were forced<br />

to work in industry, actually experienced a rise in income. In other ways<br />

the standard of living in rural areas went up. Government- subsidised<br />

modernisation programmes brought electricity to villages and the<br />

number of schools also increased. Health facilities grew, and medical care<br />

became more readily available.’ (June Granatir Alexander, ‘Slovakia’, in<br />

Richard C. Frucht, Eastern Europe: An Introduction to the People, Lands<br />

and Culture, Santa Barbara: ABC- Clio, 2005, p. 300.)<br />

53 This is in contrast to, for example, Yugoslav students during this period<br />

who were arguing for a better and more just type of communism. The<br />

Slovak critic Tomáš Štraus notes that the only excursion Mlynárčik<br />

makes into the realm of politics was during May ’68 in Paris, when he<br />

wrote the Manifesto Ferme pour cause d’inutilité: 18 Mai 1968 – Paris,<br />

Musée National d’Art Moderne. (Štraus, ‘Three Model Situations of<br />

Contemporary Art Actions’, p. 72.)<br />

54 Alex Mlynárčik interviewed by Ján Budaj, in Budaj’s samizdat publication<br />

3SD, 1981, n.p.; 2nd edition 1988; reprinted in Umenie Akce/ Action<br />

Art 1965– 1989, Bratislava: National Gallery, 2001, pp. 276– 7, translation<br />

by Mira Keratova. The full interview is translated in Bishop and<br />

Dziewańska (eds.), 1968– 1989: Political Upheaval and Artistic Change, pp.<br />

221– 32.<br />

55 Tatiana Ivanova, cited by Alex and Elena Mlynárčik, ‘Memorandum’<br />

(1971), in Restany, Ailleurs, p. 256.<br />

56 The participants in Żelibská’s Betrothal of Spring (1970), held in the Small<br />

Carpathians, were decorated in ribbons (similar to those worn by guests<br />

at wedding celebrations) while musicians performed spring- themed<br />

music under the trees. A plane passed overhead and dropped more<br />

white ribbons, which were bound around the trees by participants –<br />

effectively unifying the guests and nature in one coherently embellished<br />

environment. The aim of the festival was to pay homage to the transition<br />

from Spring to Summer, viewed as analogous to the moment when<br />

a girl becomes a woman, designed to generate intense emotive experiences.<br />

Much of Żelibská’s work concerns questions of gender and<br />

eroticism.<br />

327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!