10.09.2015 Views

ARTIFICIAL HELLS

1EOfZcf

1EOfZcf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

artificial hells<br />

Kerzhentsev advocated the end of bourgeois repertoires and even bourgeois<br />

actors, and instead promoted drama that took as its subject matter the crises<br />

of class struggle (strikes, upheavals, insurrections, revolts) and which was<br />

performed by the proletariat as part of ‘a permanent workshop . . . where<br />

stars and extras are unknown’. 44 Some Proletkult theatre groups therefore<br />

took the form of a collective institution in which every member of the theatre,<br />

from the stage- hand to the actor, participated in all aspects of the<br />

production – from the sewing of costumes, to the making of props, to the<br />

directing of scenes, to the choice of plays. This was perceived as a way to<br />

express collective consciousness; as such, the Proletkult’s aims were both<br />

social and technical: ‘On the one hand, to establish a centre of collective selfexpression<br />

for the workers; on the other, to break down specialisation in the<br />

theatre.’ 45 For Kerzhentsev, it was important that this new theatre follow the<br />

‘principle of amateurism’, in which actors avoided professionalisation in<br />

order to keep their proximity to the masses; he hoped that audiences of the<br />

future would not say ‘I am going to see something’ but ‘I am going to participate<br />

in something.’ 46 Unlike the sets of Mayakovsky and Meyerhold, those<br />

of Proletkult theatre are never photographed as environments in their own<br />

right and are strikingly meagre – planks, ladders, simple risers and painted<br />

back- cloths, as in the numerous examples reproduced in Huntly Carter’s<br />

The New Theatre and Cinema of Soviet Russia (1924).<br />

Despite economic hardships, amateur theatre proliferated across the<br />

country after 1917; the formalist critic Viktor Shklovsky noted that ‘Drama<br />

circles were multiplying more rapidly than protozoa. Not the lack of fuel,<br />

nor the lack of food, nor the Entente – no, nothing can stop their growth.’ 47<br />

Carter reported that ‘In Kostroma alone there are 600 village dramatic<br />

circles. In the Nishni- Novgorod district there are about 900.’ 48 Workers<br />

Proletkult theatre: Eisenstein’s production of Aleksandr Ostrovsky’s Enough Stupidity in Every<br />

Wise Man, 1923. The sign reads ‘Religion is the opiate of the people’.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!