06.12.2012 Views

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

START<br />

Test Mix<br />

Components<br />

Accept<br />

Mat’ls<br />

YES<br />

Prepare<br />

Trial Mix<br />

Test Mix<br />

Accept<br />

Mix<br />

YES<br />

END<br />

NO<br />

NO<br />

8<br />

Change<br />

Materials<br />

Revise<br />

Mix Design<br />

Figure 3.1: Schematic of Typical Mix Design Process<br />

3.3 DESIRABLE FEATURES FOR A NEW MIX DESIGN METHOD<br />

The current ISSA and ASTM procedures for the design of slurry seal and micro surfacing have<br />

their origins in the 1980's, before the wide-spread use of micro-surfacing and the use of polymer<br />

modified emulsions in slurry seals. As mentioned in the Phase I Report, the current<br />

recommended laboratory test methods have, in general, poor repeatability, limited ability to<br />

relate to field performance and do not characterize the material over the range of temperature<br />

and humidity conditions that may occur in the field. It is well known that humidity and<br />

temperature may dramatically influence the short term and long term performance of slurry seal<br />

or microsurfacing. Therefore, an effort was made by the research team to improve the current<br />

test methods or propose new test methods to address these issues. Ideally, the proposed test<br />

methods should be:<br />

• Repeatable<br />

• Relate to field performance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!