06.12.2012 Views

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4.25: Comparison of Losses as Determined by Wet and Dry Loss Methods<br />

Aggregate and Emulsion Effects<br />

The Aluminum base support was used and the tests repeated with two mixes, Mix M2a and Mix<br />

M2b. These mixes were cured at 77°F (25°C) and 70% humidity. The mix proportions were as<br />

follows:<br />

Mix M2a<br />

Mix M2b<br />

Loss (g)<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

• 100 grams of aggregate<br />

• 1 gram of cement<br />

• 9 grams of water (Based on the weight of dry aggregate)<br />

• 0.5 gram of additive<br />

• 15 grams of emulsion<br />

• 100 grams of aggregate<br />

• 0.5 gram of cement<br />

• 10 grams of water (Based on the weight of dry aggregate)<br />

• 0.5 gram of additive<br />

• 15 grams of emulsion<br />

Wet Loss Vs. Dry Loss method<br />

30 60 180<br />

Time of Cure (Min) 77°F (25°C ) 70% humidity.<br />

63<br />

Wet loss Felt<br />

Wet loss Steel<br />

Wet loss Al<br />

Dry loss Felt<br />

Dry Loss Steel<br />

Dry loss Al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!