PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX D RESULTS OF CAT RUGGEDNESS TESTING CAT: Cohesion Abrasion Test (French WTAT): short term Parameter Values Test No. High (H) Low (L) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Cure Time (60min) 5 -5 H L L H L H H L min 55/65 2. Cure Temp. 77°F (25°C) 2 -2 H H L L H L H L C 23/27 3. Humidity (50%) 10 -10 H H H L L H L L % 40/60 4. Test Time (1min) 5 -5 L H H H L L H L s 55/65 5. Test Temp. 77°F (25°C) 5 -5 H L H H H L L L C 20/30 6. Test Duration (1min) 5 -5 L H L H H H L L s 55/65 125
CEL#: 10-17749 LAB #: Date Tested: Apr-07 M4: Ruggedness Evaluation # 1 CAT: COHESION ABRASION TEST (FRENCH WTAT): SHORT TERM MIX 4 Project Name: Slurry/Micro Mix Design Tested By: LH 1)apply tack coat to disc and break emulsion Aggregate: Type 3 Emulsion: MSE LMCQS-1h 2)record weight of specimen after cure, before soaking Source: LOPKE Source: VSS Emultech 3)cover test specimen with water Emulsion mid-range target: 11.0 4)abrade for time below Pre-wet water mid-range target: 16.0 5)rinse debris with 1000ml of water Additive mid-range target: 1.0 Additive: cement type 2 6)carefully pat dry with towel Additive mid-range target: 0.00 Additive: Aluminum sulfate 7)record weight after test Additive mid-range target: Additive: Additive mid-range target: Additive: Curing Conditions: Cohes.Abrasion w/wheels Control Eval#1 % material weights,g Temperature,°C 25 27 °C -- aggregate 1350.0 agg Temperature,°F 77 80.6 °F 1.0 cement / lime 13.5 cement 126 Other: ___________ Humidity, % 50 60 NONE 16.0 water 216.0 water 0.0 Aluminum sulfate 0.0 Aluminum sulfate Soaking period before testing see below 11.0 emulsion (target) 148.5 emulsion Other: ___________ Compaction w/ roller immediately before testing A Cure Cure Cure Test time Test Test B C=A-B Original Time Temp Humidity in pan bfore Temp Duraction Final Loss Wt, g minutes °F °C abras, sec sec Wt, g Wt, g 1864.2 65 80.6 27.0 60 55 30 55 1533.3 330.9 1875.7 65 81 27.2 60 55 30 55 1617.1 258.6 1866.6 65 80.2 26.8 60 55 31 55 1563.8 302.8
Page 1 and 2:
PHASE II REPORT Slurry Seal / Micro
Page 3 and 4:
CALTRANS Fugro Consultants, Inc. Co
Page 5 and 6:
CALTRANS Fugro Consultants, Inc. Co
Page 7 and 8:
For the Phase II work, the research
Page 9 and 10:
2.0 CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 BACK
Page 11 and 12:
3.0 Findings from the ruggedness te
Page 13 and 14:
START Test Mix Components Accept Ma
Page 15 and 16:
For all the above considerations, t
Page 17 and 18:
Type II and III microsurfacings are
Page 19 and 20:
“M” Refers to an ASSHTO Standar
Page 21 and 22:
Viscosity: A property of the mix th
Page 23 and 24:
3.6.2 The European Mixing Test Base
Page 25 and 26:
Mix Torque kg-cm 70 60 50 40 30 20
Page 27 and 28:
Clamping Pressure 200Kpa Interface
Page 29 and 30:
Samples Holes 0.8 inches (~0.20 mm
Page 31 and 32:
• Abrasion: CAT. This test may be
Page 33 and 34:
3.7.1 Step 1: Materials Selection T
Page 35 and 36:
3.7.6 Step 6: Evaluate the Long Ter
Page 37 and 38:
4.2 LABORATORY TEST METHODS DEVELOP
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4.2.2: TB-113 Results for Mix
Page 41 and 42:
In addition to the “base mixture
Page 43 and 44:
The resulting mix had the following
Page 45 and 46:
Features: Produces a tangential flo
Page 47 and 48:
Mixing Containers type and size: a.
Page 49 and 50:
• 50 rpm mixing speed This config
Page 51 and 52:
The shape of the traces for differe
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 4.10: Mix M4 Trace with Stan
Page 55 and 56:
The recommended mixing procedure fo
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 4.14: AMT Trace for Mix M1,
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 4.16: Automated Cohesion Tes
Page 61 and 62:
As illustrated in Figures 4.17 and
Page 63 and 64:
Note that the ratio of the two aver
Page 65 and 66:
• Dry Loss Method - Two identical
Page 67 and 68:
Loss (%) 35 30 20 15 10 5 0 Effect
Page 69 and 70:
The differences in the samples were
Page 71 and 72:
Both systems were correctly defined
Page 73 and 74:
Time (Min) Wet Loss M1 (g) Table 4.
Page 75 and 76:
observation. For long term abrasion
Page 77 and 78:
4.3.2 Evaluation of Cohesion-Abrasi
Page 79 and 80: 4.4 REVISED MIX DESIGN METHOD (VERS
Page 81 and 82: Step 5: Evaluate the Cohesion Prope
Page 83 and 84: 5.0 CHAPTER 5 RUGGEDNESS TESTING 5.
Page 85 and 86: These levels will be far enough apa
Page 87 and 88: 5.3.3 ACT Test For this test, the c
Page 89 and 90: 6.1.2 AGGREGATE Mineral aggregate s
Page 91 and 92: shall perform the mix design. The p
Page 93 and 94: 6.5.2 TEST STRIP. With the coordina
Page 95 and 96: 6.6.5 MACHINE CALIBRATION. Each uni
Page 97 and 98: 6.7 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT 6.7.1 ARE
Page 99 and 100: Delays in the progress of the resea
Page 101 and 102: 2.4 IDA Werke EUROSTAR Power contro
Page 103 and 104: 4.3 If the mix does not break, the
Page 105 and 106: 8.0 PROCEDURE 8.1 Maintain the aggr
Page 107 and 108: 11.2.1.1 BT: brown color transfer t
Page 109 and 110: Note: Closing all other programs ru
Page 111 and 112: − Eurostar mixer - the parameter
Page 113 and 114: Figure A.5: Display of Functional U
Page 115 and 116: To stop the test, select the drop d
Page 117 and 118: 2.3 ISSA TB-100, Test Method for We
Page 119 and 120: 5.4 Suitable specimen casting mold
Page 121 and 122: 8.2 The amounts of material compone
Page 123 and 124: 9.2 Completely cover the specimen w
Page 125 and 126: APPENDIX C RESULTS OF RUGGEDNESS AM
Page 127 and 128: Figure C.2: Ruggedness Trials Trial
Page 129: Figure C.4: Ruggedness Trials Trial
Page 133 and 134: CEL#: 10-17749 LAB #: Date Tested:
Page 139 and 140: CAT: COHESION ABRASION TEST (FRENCH
Page 149 and 150: 2.CAT-Cohesion Abrasion Test: Frenc
Page 151 and 152: GRADATION ANALYSIS FOR AGGREGATE A1
Page 161 and 162: Source: Lopke (A2) Aggregate: ISSA
Page 171 and 172: GRADATION ANALYSES FOR AGGREGATE A3
Page 181 and 182:
SODIUM SULFATE SOUNDNESS FOR AGGREG
Page 183 and 184:
SODIUM SULFATE SOUNDNESS FOR AGGREG
Page 185 and 186:
ABRASION LOSS BY AASHTO T-96 FOR AG
Page 187 and 188:
SAND EQUIVALENT FOR AGGREGATES A1,
Page 189 and 190:
ABRASION LOSS BY ASTM D6928 FOR AGG
Page 191 and 192:
CEL# 10-17749 Source: Sem Materials
Page 193 and 194:
CEL# 10-17749 Source: VSS Emultech
Page 195 and 196:
CEL# 10-17749 Source: Ergon Materia
Page 197 and 198:
Automated Mixing Test Mix: M3 Agg:
Page 199 and 200:
CEL#: 10-17749 1)apply tack coat to
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Aggregates: Emulsions: Mixes: CAT R
Page 231 and 232:
ACT RESULTS FOR ALL MIXES TEST RESU
Page 233 and 234:
ACT RESULTS FOR ALL MIXES 228
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
not effective if placed on pavement
Page 249 and 250:
Table F.1: Draft Outline for Refere
Page 251 and 252:
David Peshkin will take the lead in
Page 253 and 254:
Ride quality has been shown to impa
Page 255 and 256:
agency will be held prior to constr
Page 257 and 258:
An agency that desires to participa
show all

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?