06.12.2012 Views

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

prohibitive. This would also burden the participating State Departments of Transportation with<br />

additional responsibilities. Therefore, this sort of sampling and testing will not be undertaken.<br />

The primary focus of this study will be on the constructability of the recommended mix-designs<br />

and their performance compared to existing mix design procedures or various maintenance<br />

treatments. It is not recommended that subgrade soil and base types be included in the site<br />

selection. These treatments will be placed within the same site location and the structure<br />

should be approximately the same. If changes in pavement type or structural design are<br />

identified, the site should be adjusted to eliminate the presence of multiple pavement structures.<br />

The structural capacity of the pavement is important in determining the life span of the<br />

pavement. It is recommended that only those sites with sufficient remaining life (five years) be<br />

used for this study. This should prevent the need for maintenance and rehabilitation activities<br />

prior to completing the study.<br />

5.4.2 Test Section Layout<br />

The section layout will depend on the number of test sections desired for the study. As a<br />

minimum, the sections should include a control section without treatment and a slurry seal or<br />

micro-surfacing test section. This will provide validation of the constructability of the<br />

recommended mix design as well as the effect of the treatment on extending the existing<br />

pavement’s life. However, this type of experiment does not allow a comparison of the<br />

improvement of the recommended mix design to existing mix designs or other treatments.<br />

Multiple treatment sections (e.g., slurry seal and micro-surfacing systems with different binders)<br />

along with the control are recommended to obtain the amount of information necessary for a<br />

complete evaluation and validation.<br />

Multiple test sections using micro-surfacing may be placed using different types of polymers<br />

(e.g., natural rubber, synthetic rubber latex [SBR], or various combinations). It is recommended<br />

that a section using the ISSA design procedure be placed along with one of the recommended<br />

design procedures to determine the long-term performance of each type of mix design. The<br />

number of treated sections will depend on the results of the Phase <strong>II</strong> study and the desire of<br />

States to include supplemental sections to evaluate additional materials/treatments. Each<br />

treatment will be placed according to the construction guidelines described in this work plan.<br />

The recommended length of the test sections will be determined by the project team with<br />

approval from the panel and will be a minimum of 500 feet (152 m) and a maximum of 1000 feet<br />

(305 m). The length of each test section will remain constant for each site in this study.<br />

5.4.3 Construction Guidelines<br />

The construction guidelines to be developed are intended to insure proper placement of the<br />

material. Direct discussions between the teams, the contractor, and the participating State<br />

249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!