06.12.2012 Views

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Loss (%)<br />

35<br />

30<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Effect of Support Dry Method<br />

30 60 180<br />

Time of Cure (Min) 77°F (25°C) 70% Humidity.<br />

Figure 4.24: Effect of Support Base Type on Dry Loss Method, Mix M2<br />

It was concluded that metal (Steel or Aluminum) support bases are easier to handle and create<br />

less aggregate loss. The use of a metal support base is therefore recommended. The<br />

Aluminum base is preferred because it is lighter and more resistant to corrosion.<br />

The recommended assessment method is the Wet Loss Method. Even though both, the Wet<br />

Loss Method and the Dry Loss Method had reproducible results, the Wet Loss Method was<br />

preferred since immediate results can be obtained. A comparison of the loss measured with the<br />

two methods shown in Figure 4.25.<br />

62<br />

Loss % of dry Felt<br />

Loss % of dry Steel<br />

Loss % of dry Aluminum

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!