06.12.2012 Views

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

PHASE II REPORT - Caltrans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Both systems were correctly defined by this test as quick set; the aggregate effect was clearly<br />

distinguished. Compaction did consolidate the surface to some extent but an analysis of the<br />

data indicates that there is no significant difference between the compacted and non-compacted<br />

specimens and as a result compaction is not recommended. This is illustrated in Figure 4.29.<br />

wet Loss g<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Figure 4.29: Effect of Compaction on M2 Mixes (Wet Loss Method)<br />

4.2.4 Effect of Tack Coat<br />

Effect of Compaction Wet Loss at 1 Hour Cure<br />

M2a Mix M2b<br />

(60 Min Cure at 70°F (25°C) 70% Humidity)<br />

Tack coat was applied on the metal base using a brush. The base plate was covered with a<br />

thin, even coat of emulsion. The tack coat was allowed to dry to the touch. As illustrated in<br />

Figure 4.30, the tack seemed to reduce losses perhaps by holding the sample firmly and<br />

preventing shear at the base.<br />

66<br />

Not compacted<br />

Compacted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!