- Page 1 and 2:
Inter‐Agency Real Time Evaluation
- Page 3 and 4:
Annex 4.1 Group meetings with the a
- Page 5 and 6:
Conclusions and recommendations bas
- Page 7 and 8:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
- Page 9 and 10:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
- Page 11 and 12:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
- Page 13 and 14:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
- Page 15:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
- Page 18 and 19:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 20 and 21:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 22 and 23:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 24 and 25:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 26 and 27:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 28 and 29:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 30 and 31:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 32 and 33:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 34 and 35:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 36 and 37:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 38 and 39:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 40 and 41:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 42 and 43:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 44 and 45:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 46 and 47:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 48 and 49:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 50 and 51:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 52 and 53:
7.2 Monitoring IA RTE of the humani
- Page 54 and 55:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 56 and 57:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 58 and 59:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 60 and 61:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
- Page 62 and 63:
9 ‐ Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Ref
- Page 64 and 65:
4. METHODOLOGY IA RTE of the humani
- Page 66 and 67:
The ‘IA RTE Framework’ as Diagr
- Page 68 and 69: Needs IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK D
- Page 70 and 71: Access, Principles, Advocacy IA RTE
- Page 72 and 73: M&E IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dim
- Page 74 and 75: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
- Page 76 and 77: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
- Page 78 and 79: � Have relevant, prioritized, inc
- Page 80 and 81: Action, HAP 2007 Standard in Humani
- Page 82 and 83: � Approves the final IA RTE repor
- Page 84 and 85: (details see row below) � Sindh:
- Page 86 and 87: words and a main text of no more th
- Page 88 and 89: UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
- Page 90 and 91: Baltistan and Pakistan‐Administer
- Page 92 and 93: continues to impede returns. The ND
- Page 94 and 95: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 96 and 97: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 98 and 99: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 100 and 101: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 102 and 103: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 104 and 105: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 106 and 107: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 108 and 109: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
- Page 110 and 111: Summary of interviews by category o
- Page 112 and 113: 21. Ashfar Ahmad Save the Children
- Page 114 and 115: 19. Farrusch Mirza UNICEF 20. Hamad
- Page 116 and 117: 13 . Dube Alfred WHO 14 . Masooma H
- Page 120 and 121: Annex 4.3: Field Work Itenerary Dat
- Page 122 and 123: Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
- Page 124 and 125: Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
- Page 126 and 127: Annex 5 Interview Guide IA‐RTE In
- Page 128 and 129: . With whom (military, government,
- Page 130 and 131: 6‐ Did the needs assessments take
- Page 132 and 133: Millions 900,0 800,0 700,0 600,0 50
- Page 134 and 135: Annex 7: Cluster Output Review Tabl
- Page 136 and 137: Source: Logistics Cluster, Feb 2011
- Page 138 and 139: Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency R
- Page 140: Ms. Aatika Nagrah, a development pr