Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IA RTE of the humanitarian response to Pakistan’s 2010 Floods crisis g) NDMA, with OCHA, should ensure the roll‐out of the newly developed Single Reporting Format in the current and future disasters. h) NDMA, with EAD and IASC representatives, define integrated results based monitoring framework for future emergencies (aligned with single reporting format) which includes: � measurable progress indicators � outcome indicators � level of expenditures � 4 W’s (who, what, where and when) III) The Special Envoy and HC/RC with OCHA should promote humanitarian diplomacy to guarantee needs based and principled approaches during humanitarian responses and all Humanitarian actors need to commit to it. To do so: i) The HC and HCT must be in a position to prioritize and lead the humanitarian response above individual agencies interests. j) HC/RC, with OCHA, will ensure HCT alignment on guidelines for use of military assets in future emergencies (only as providers of last resort). IV) Overall funding for the current disaster has been insufficient particularly for recovery assistance and many local organisations have had difficulties in assessing funds. Therefore; in future crisis: k) HCT, in consultation with GoP and donors, should define ways to ensure that funding for existing emergency appeals is not undermined by any new emergency appeal. l) OCHA with Clusters need to build the capacity of implementing partners to ensure they can effectively access funding, especially ERF. VI) At global level, cluster approached need to be adapted to host countries’ capacities and structures as well as to the specific scale of disaster m) IASC Working Group must ensure that guidelines on roll‐out of clusters are adapted to contextual realities (i.e. size of disaster, strength of national capacities, cross cutting issues and civil‐ and military response mechanisms and funding) and flexible to be aligned with host governments’ priorities and existing institutions. VII) There is a need to strengthen leadership of clusters. Cluster lead agencies should appoint skilled, experienced, independent/dedicated full‐time cluster leads. To mobilise qualified human resources: Riccardo Polastro, Aatika Nagrah, Nicolai Steen and Farwa Zafar 60
IA RTE of the humanitarian response to Pakistan’s 2010 Floods crisis n) GoP develop a national surge capacity registry (including provincial and district levels) o) OCHA with UN agencies ensure that cluster‐leads are trained (in compulsory web‐based training before deployment) p) UN agencies, with stand‐by partners, ensure that lengths of contracts of surge deployments are commensurate to scale and duration of emergencies. VIII) To improve effectiveness of current and future responses, NDMA, with representatives from HCT and PHF and national NGO counterpart forums must form a Working Group to: q) Track and follow‐up on the application of recommendations from recent evaluations and the extent to which they have been implemented and r) Draw management a response plan on recommendations from the Floods 2010 IA‐RTE. The RTE team should do follow‐up visit to check implementation process Riccardo Polastro, Aatika Nagrah, Nicolai Steen and Farwa Zafar 61
Page 1 and 2:
Inter‐Agency Real Time Evaluation
Page 3 and 4:
Annex 4.1 Group meetings with the a
Page 5 and 6:
Conclusions and recommendations bas
Page 7 and 8:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 9 and 10: Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 15: Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 18 and 19: IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 52 and 53: 7.2 Monitoring IA RTE of the humani
Page 62 and 63: 9 ‐ Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Ref
Page 64 and 65: 4. METHODOLOGY IA RTE of the humani
Page 66 and 67: The ‘IA RTE Framework’ as Diagr
Page 68 and 69: Needs IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK D
Page 70 and 71: Access, Principles, Advocacy IA RTE
Page 72 and 73: M&E IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dim
Page 74 and 75: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 76 and 77: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 78 and 79: � Have relevant, prioritized, inc
Page 80 and 81: Action, HAP 2007 Standard in Humani
Page 82 and 83: � Approves the final IA RTE repor
Page 84 and 85: (details see row below) � Sindh:
Page 86 and 87: words and a main text of no more th
Page 88 and 89: UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
Page 90 and 91: Baltistan and Pakistan‐Administer
Page 92 and 93: continues to impede returns. The ND
Page 94 and 95: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
Page 110 and 111:
Summary of interviews by category o
Page 112 and 113:
21. Ashfar Ahmad Save the Children
Page 114 and 115:
19. Farrusch Mirza UNICEF 20. Hamad
Page 116 and 117:
13 . Dube Alfred WHO 14 . Masooma H
Page 118 and 119:
14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Fareeha Ummar O
Page 120 and 121:
Annex 4.3: Field Work Itenerary Dat
Page 122 and 123:
Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 124 and 125:
Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 126 and 127:
Annex 5 Interview Guide IA‐RTE In
Page 128 and 129:
. With whom (military, government,
Page 130 and 131:
6‐ Did the needs assessments take
Page 132 and 133:
Millions 900,0 800,0 700,0 600,0 50
Page 134 and 135:
Annex 7: Cluster Output Review Tabl
Page 136 and 137:
Source: Logistics Cluster, Feb 2011
Page 138 and 139:
Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency R
Page 140:
Ms. Aatika Nagrah, a development pr
show all

Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?