Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

Action, HAP 2007 Standard in Humanitarian Accountability and Quality Management, Code
of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in
Disaster Relief, guidance on civil‐military relations and protected humanitarian space and on
gender equality?
Additional Questions and Issues raised during the Evaluation Management Preparatory
Mission
Further to the pre questions above, the evaluation team should consider the following
questions. These questions have been raised during the evaluation manager’s preparatory
mission to Pakistan:
1. How adequate was OCHA’s leadership role, particularly in Needs Assessment (including
context analysis of local capacities and existing data) and Information Management.
2. How appropriate, coherent and connected was the wider cluster architecture in
Pakistan (at federal provincial and district level)? In how far and for what reasons did /
or didn’t the cluster approach plug in to existing national coordination structures?
3. How appropriate and coherent were oversight and monitoring capacities of all actors
including implementing partners and how were they linked to strategic and operational
decision‐making?
4. Have appropriate and timely ICMMs been established in order to agree on inter‐cluster
response strategies including priorities of the response?
5. How to increase and improve capacities of cluster coordination at all levels?
6. How appropriate and timely have early recovery issues been included into life saving
cluster strategies?
6. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
80 | P age