Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Area Finding Conclusion Recommendation Priority Level By whom By when The UN is not always Effectiveness, efficiency HCT members will ensure High National HCT Ongoing and perceived by all as and accountability of that response is continuous accountable for how some UN agencies & monitored and results resources were spent. INGOs have been shared. Some UN agencies did not questioned by donors, manage to spend the GoP and implementing The UN must reduce High Global/ UN Agencies/ Ongoing large amounts of funding partners. transaction costs. National INGOs received. Some donors question the UN value for Broadly there is UN agencies and IPs High National UN agencies Ongoing money having high insufficient commitment produce results transaction costs, where to the aid effectiveness commensurate to the funding go through agenda. level of funding received multiple IPs for (i.e. through unit cost implementation (multiple layers). Ref paragraph 28 analysis). Funding 2 6 | P age
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendation Priority Level By whom By when There is a clear need to While few sectors have NDMA/PND/Line Medium National/ NDMA (clusters March 15 focus on getting updated clarity of early recovery Departments, with Provincial/ and PND) data on recovery. scope and needs, today, clusters, roll out a joint Districts there is no recovery needs comprehensive assessment assessment of outstanding recovery In future disasters NDMA Medium National/ GoP needs. defines who coordinates Provincial/ needs assessments Districts th June 30 th Assessments 3 The current response plans are based on individual agency and sectoral early recovery needs assessments. Even if some were conducted in September a comprehensive assessment is still missing. Most organizations are preparing new assessments but few of these are coordinated Ref. paragraphs 42 and 51 Residual relief needs have partially been identified in priority districts. 7 | P age
Page 1 and 2: Inter‐Agency Real Time Evaluation
Page 3 and 4: Annex 4.1 Group meetings with the a
Page 5: Conclusions and recommendations bas
Page 9 and 10: Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 15: Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 18 and 19: IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 52 and 53: 7.2 Monitoring IA RTE of the humani
Page 56 and 57:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
9 ‐ Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Ref
Page 64 and 65:
4. METHODOLOGY IA RTE of the humani
Page 66 and 67:
The ‘IA RTE Framework’ as Diagr
Page 68 and 69:
Needs IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK D
Page 70 and 71:
Access, Principles, Advocacy IA RTE
Page 72 and 73:
M&E IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dim
Page 74 and 75:
IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 76 and 77:
IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 78 and 79:
� Have relevant, prioritized, inc
Page 80 and 81:
Action, HAP 2007 Standard in Humani
Page 82 and 83:
� Approves the final IA RTE repor
Page 84 and 85:
(details see row below) � Sindh:
Page 86 and 87:
words and a main text of no more th
Page 88 and 89:
UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
Page 90 and 91:
Baltistan and Pakistan‐Administer
Page 92 and 93:
continues to impede returns. The ND
Page 94 and 95:
Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Summary of interviews by category o
Page 112 and 113:
21. Ashfar Ahmad Save the Children
Page 114 and 115:
19. Farrusch Mirza UNICEF 20. Hamad
Page 116 and 117:
13 . Dube Alfred WHO 14 . Masooma H
Page 118 and 119:
14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Fareeha Ummar O
Page 120 and 121:
Annex 4.3: Field Work Itenerary Dat
Page 122 and 123:
Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 124 and 125:
Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 126 and 127:
Annex 5 Interview Guide IA‐RTE In
Page 128 and 129:
. With whom (military, government,
Page 130 and 131:
6‐ Did the needs assessments take
Page 132 and 133:
Millions 900,0 800,0 700,0 600,0 50
Page 134 and 135:
Annex 7: Cluster Output Review Tabl
Page 136 and 137:
Source: Logistics Cluster, Feb 2011
Page 138 and 139:
Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency R
Page 140:
Ms. Aatika Nagrah, a development pr
show all

Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?