Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensions Characteristics of an Ideal Operation Ownership and Connectedness carried out in close collaboration with preexisting response structures (such as the Government / military and civil protection). � A common strategy by all involved stakeholders has been developed to guarantee security and access. 74 Key Questions (apply generally and also to each Cluster) Indicators & Data Sources (Timelines daily during the first 2-3 weeks, then weekly and later monthly tbd) Daily Situation Reports
IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensions Characteristics of an Ideal Operation Common Strategy for Security & Access IV. RESPONSE (and preparedness) Quality and Timeliness of Response � All parts of the affected population could be assisted in a timely, adequate and effective manner – based on their needs. 75 Key Questions (apply generally and also to each Cluster) � How adequate was the response as a whole, and what operational results as well as positive and negative outcomes for the affected population did it produce? � Have critical gaps and issues been identified and addressed in a timely way system-wide and by each Cluster? Indicators & Data Sources (Timelines daily during the first 2-3 weeks, then weekly and later monthly tbd) � Coverage of beneficiary needs � Mapping and analysis of operational bottlenecks � Tracing of main features of operational response (who did deliver what, where and when?) Field visits to affected areas
Page 1 and 2:
Inter‐Agency Real Time Evaluation
Page 3 and 4:
Annex 4.1 Group meetings with the a
Page 5 and 6:
Conclusions and recommendations bas
Page 7 and 8:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15:
Page 18 and 19:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25: IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 52 and 53: 7.2 Monitoring IA RTE of the humani
Page 62 and 63: 9 ‐ Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Ref
Page 64 and 65: 4. METHODOLOGY IA RTE of the humani
Page 66 and 67: The ‘IA RTE Framework’ as Diagr
Page 68 and 69: Needs IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK D
Page 70 and 71: Access, Principles, Advocacy IA RTE
Page 72 and 73: M&E IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dim
Page 76 and 77: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 78 and 79: � Have relevant, prioritized, inc
Page 80 and 81: Action, HAP 2007 Standard in Humani
Page 82 and 83: � Approves the final IA RTE repor
Page 84 and 85: (details see row below) � Sindh:
Page 86 and 87: words and a main text of no more th
Page 88 and 89: UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
Page 90 and 91: Baltistan and Pakistan‐Administer
Page 92 and 93: continues to impede returns. The ND
Page 94 and 95: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
Page 110 and 111: Summary of interviews by category o
Page 112 and 113: 21. Ashfar Ahmad Save the Children
Page 114 and 115: 19. Farrusch Mirza UNICEF 20. Hamad
Page 116 and 117: 13 . Dube Alfred WHO 14 . Masooma H
Page 118 and 119: 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Fareeha Ummar O
Page 120 and 121: Annex 4.3: Field Work Itenerary Dat
Page 122 and 123: Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 124 and 125:
Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 126 and 127:
Annex 5 Interview Guide IA‐RTE In
Page 128 and 129:
. With whom (military, government,
Page 130 and 131:
6‐ Did the needs assessments take
Page 132 and 133:
Millions 900,0 800,0 700,0 600,0 50
Page 134 and 135:
Annex 7: Cluster Output Review Tabl
Page 136 and 137:
Source: Logistics Cluster, Feb 2011
Page 138 and 139:
Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency R
Page 140:
Ms. Aatika Nagrah, a development pr
show all

Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?