Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

More documents

Recommendations

Info

words and a main text of no more than 10,000 words, both inclusive of clear and concise recommendations. The outcome summary of proceedings shall become an integral part of the final RTE report. Annexes should include a list of all individuals interviewed, a bibliography, a description of method(s) employed, a summary of survey results (if applicable), and any other relevant materials. The report will be submitted two weeks after the completion of the mission. To be completed two weeks after the workshops have taken place. Draft reports will be submitted to the HCT and IA RTE Management Group, who will be afforded 7 days to comment. The document will subsequently be disseminated to a wider audience for comment. The evaluation team is solely responsible for the final products. While maintaining independence, the team will adhere to professional standards and language, particularly that which may relate to the protection of staff and operations. Direct consultations with affected populations will be a formal requirement of the evaluation unless security conditions are overriding. Additionally, agencies at the country level and the IA RTE Support Group will be consulted prior to the dissemination of any products emanating from the evaluation. All analytical results and products arising from this evaluation will be owned by the IASC RTE Support Group. The team leader and/or members will not be allowed without prior authorization in writing to present any of the analytical results as his or her own work or to make use of the evaluation results for private publication purposes. Compliance ALNAP quality pro forma is expected and the evaluation report will be judged in this regard. All external evaluation reports will also be submitted to ALNAP for inclusion in the regular meta‐evaluation process that rates the quality of evaluation reports. The key to success of the workshops and the pre‐requisite for the above mentioned deliverables is availability and commitment by the respective HCT (including ICMM, UN, INGOs, local NGO’s, NDMA/ PDMA, DCO) at federal and provincial level for a one‐ day workshop in each of the four provinces and Islamabad. 86 | P age
Annex 2: List of Accronyms ADB Asian Development Bank AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome CERF Central Emergency Response Fund CRS Catholic Relief Services DAC Development Assistance Committee DCO District Coordinating Officer DEWS Disease Early Warning Systems DFID Department for International Development DG ECHO Directorate General of the European Commission for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection DNA Damage Needs Assessment DRM Disaster Risk Management DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EAD Economic Affairs Division EC European Commission ERC Emergency Response Coordinator ERNA Early Recovery Needs Assessment FATA Federally Administered Tribal Areas GoP Government of Pakistan HCT Humanitarian Country Team HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus IA‐RTE Inter Agency‐Real Time Evaluation IASC Inter Agency Standing Committee ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IDP Internally Displaced Person INGO International Non‐Governmental Organization IOM International Organization for Migration KPK Kyber Pakhtunkhwa MCRAM Multi‐Cluster Rapid Assessment Mechanism MSF Médecins Sans Frontières NADRA National Database & Registration Authority NDMA National Disaster Management Authority NFRI Non Food Relief Items NGO Non‐Governmental Organization OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs OECD Organisation for Economic Development OFDA Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance PDMA Provincial Disaster Management Authority PFERP Pakistan Floods Emergency Response Plan PFRERRP Pakistan Flood Relief and Early Recovery Response Plan PHRP Pakistan Humanitarian Response Plan PIFERP Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency Response Plan RC Resident Coordinator SG Secretary General SMART Specific, Measurable, Accountable, Reasonable and Time bound Strategic Planning UNIT SPU UK United Kingdom UN United Nations UNDAC United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 87 | P age
Page 1 and 2:
Inter‐Agency Real Time Evaluation
Page 3 and 4:
Annex 4.1 Group meetings with the a
Page 5 and 6:
Conclusions and recommendations bas
Page 7 and 8:
Area Finding Conclusion Recommendat
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15:
Page 18 and 19:
IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37: IA RTE of the humanitarian response
Page 52 and 53: 7.2 Monitoring IA RTE of the humani
Page 62 and 63: 9 ‐ Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Ref
Page 64 and 65: 4. METHODOLOGY IA RTE of the humani
Page 66 and 67: The ‘IA RTE Framework’ as Diagr
Page 68 and 69: Needs IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK D
Page 70 and 71: Access, Principles, Advocacy IA RTE
Page 72 and 73: M&E IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dim
Page 74 and 75: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 76 and 77: IA RTE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK Dimensi
Page 78 and 79: � Have relevant, prioritized, inc
Page 80 and 81: Action, HAP 2007 Standard in Humani
Page 82 and 83: � Approves the final IA RTE repor
Page 84 and 85: (details see row below) � Sindh:
Page 88 and 89: UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
Page 90 and 91: Baltistan and Pakistan‐Administer
Page 92 and 93: continues to impede returns. The ND
Page 94 and 95: Surname, Forenames Org. ♂♀ Meth
Page 110 and 111: Summary of interviews by category o
Page 112 and 113: 21. Ashfar Ahmad Save the Children
Page 114 and 115: 19. Farrusch Mirza UNICEF 20. Hamad
Page 116 and 117: 13 . Dube Alfred WHO 14 . Masooma H
Page 118 and 119: 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Fareeha Ummar O
Page 120 and 121: Annex 4.3: Field Work Itenerary Dat
Page 122 and 123: Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 124 and 125: Date Riccardo Polastro Nicolai Stee
Page 126 and 127: Annex 5 Interview Guide IA‐RTE In
Page 128 and 129: . With whom (military, government,
Page 130 and 131: 6‐ Did the needs assessments take
Page 132 and 133: Millions 900,0 800,0 700,0 600,0 50
Page 134 and 135: Annex 7: Cluster Output Review Tabl
Page 136 and 137:
Source: Logistics Cluster, Feb 2011
Page 138 and 139:
Pakistan Initial Floods Emergency R
Page 140:
Ms. Aatika Nagrah, a development pr
show all

Inter-Agency Real Time Evaluation of the Humanitarian ... - alnap

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?